zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Normality criteria for families of meromorphic functions. (English) Zbl 0667.30028

This paper presents the state-of-art technology of using Nevanlinna’s calculus to obtain normal-family criteria. It starts from the beginning, even recalling Nevanlinna’s “fundamental theorems”, but is beautifully developed. The idea is to show that if F is a family of meromorphic functions on a domain G of the plane, and if say z=0 is in G, then

(*)T(r,f)=O(1)forallfFfor0<r<r 0 ,

for some r 0 >0. Such an estimate shows that F is normal for example, near 0. The complication is that the standard calculus yields bounds in which the right side of (*) often involves intricate error terms i.e. terms which involve f and its derivatives at 0 and the problem becomes to control these.

The author’s approach depends on three ingredients. The first is now standard, and involves making infinitesimal changes of the origin to control many of these error terms, assuming always that F is not normal near 0. The second is making full use of the “Lohwater-Piranian-Zalcman principle” that if F is not normal at 0, there exist ρ j 0, z j 0, a sequence f j F, and a nonconstant function g(z); meromorphic in the plane, such that f j (z j +ρ j z)g(z), this makes it possible to control what would otherwise be error terms of hopeless complexity. Finally, there is an interesting use of techniques of G. Frank and G./W. Hennekemper which heretofore have been applied to fixed differential polynomials.

The new criteria include: (1) if nk+4, a0 and f (k) (z)+P(z,f)-af n omits a fixed value b for all (fF), where P is a fixed linear differential polynomial with analytic coefficients involving derivatives of order k-1 in f; (2) if (f n ) (k) 1 in G and either nk+1 with F an analytic family or nk+3 with F meromorphic.

The final two criteria are of a different nature. The families considered now satisfy (1) f (k) (z)0 for all integers k or (2) ff (k) 0 for a fixed k2 (if F is an analytic family) or k3 (meromorphic case). The conclusion now is that the logarithmic derivatives of functions in F form a normal family.

Note: In the statement of Theorem 3.2, “meromorphic” should be replaced by “analytic”.

Reviewer: D.Drasin

MSC:
30D45Bloch functions, normal functions, normal families
References:
[1]L. Ahlfors,Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
[2]H. Behnke and F. Sommer,Theorie der analytischen Funktionen einer komplexen, Veränderlichen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.
[3]J. Clunie,On a result of Hayman, J. London Math. Soc.42 (1967), 389–392. · Zbl 0169.40801 · doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-42.1.389
[4]D. Drasin,Normal families and the Nevanlinna theory, Acta Math.122 (1969), 231–263. · Zbl 0176.02802 · doi:10.1007/BF02392012
[5]G. Frank,Eine Vermutung von Hayman über Nullstellen meromorpher Funktionen, Math. Z.149 (1976), 29–36. · Zbl 0321.30034 · doi:10.1007/BF01301627
[6]G. Frank and W. Hennekemper,Einige Ergebnisse in der Werteverteilung meromorpher funktionen und ihrer Ableitungen, Resultate Math.4 (1981), 29–36.
[7]W. K. Hayman,Picard values of meromorphic functions and their derivatives, Ann. Math. (2)70 (1959), 9–42. · Zbl 0088.28505 · doi:10.2307/1969890
[8]W. K. Hayman,Meromorphic Functions, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964.
[9]G. Hennekemper,Über Fragen der Werteverteilung von Differentialpolynomen meromorpher Funktionen, Dissertation Hagen, 1979.
[10]K. Hiong,Sur les fonctions holomorphes dont les dérivées admettent une valeur exceptionelle, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (3)72 (1955), 165–197.
[11]H. Milloux,Les fonctions meromorphes et leurs derivees, Actual. Sci. Ind. No. 888, Paris (1940).
[12]L. Yang,Normal families and differential polynomials, Scientia Sinica (Series A)26 (1983), 673–686.
[13]L. Zalcman,A heuristic principle in complex function theory, Am. Math. Monthly82 (1975), 813–817. · Zbl 0315.30036 · doi:10.2307/2319796