The author records various identities, as an example: If an integer , then
Also, he points out a correction in the formula
in which the constant 144 should be 216. The formula (2) was obtained by the reviewer in [Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 18, 794-800 (1987; Zbl 0625.10031)]. This correction is trivial and it can be seen easily from the equation (3.1.6) of the above paper.
In the following paper [Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 18, 891-895 (1987; Zbl 0635.10036)] much more has been proved by the reviewer jointly with K. Ramachandra. The method of the paper under review is not very different from the above mentioned paper.