zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
On using random walks to solve the space-fractional advection-dispersion equations. (English) Zbl 1092.82038

The solution of space-fractional advection-dispersion equations (fADE) by random walks depends on the analogy between the fADE and the forward equation for the associated Markov process. The forward equation, which provides a Lagrangian description of particles moving under specific Markov processes, is derived here by the adjoint method. The fADE, however, provides an Eulerian description of solute fluxes. There are two forms of the fADE, based on fractional-flux (FF-ADE) and fractional divergence (FD-ADE). The FF-ADE is derived by taking the integer-order mass conservation of non-local diffusive flux into account, while the FD-ADE is derived by considering the fractional-order mass conservation of local diffusive flux. The analogy between the fADE and the forward equation depends on which form of the fADE is used and on the spatial variability of the dispersion coefficient D in the fADE. If D does not vary in space, then the fADEs can be solved by tracking particles following a Markov process with a simple drift and an α-stable Lévy noise with index α that corresponds to the fractional order of the fADE. If D varies smoothly in space and the solute concentration at the upstream boundary remains zero, the FD-ADE can be solved by simulating a Markov process with a simple drift, an α-stable Lévy noise and an additional term with the dispersion gradient and an additional Lévy noise of order α-1. However, a non-Markov process might be needed to solve the FF-ADE with a space-dependent D, except for specific D such as a linear function of space.

In the present article, the authors concentrate on the solution of fADEs with space-dependent velocity and dispersion coefficients since they are more realistic and there are no analytical solutions. Numerical examples are also presented as demonstrations.

MSC:
82C70Transport processes (time-dependent statistical mechanics)
References:
[1]B. Baeumer and M. M. Meerschaert, Frac. Calc. Appl. Anal 4:481 (2001).
[2]D. A. Benson, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nevada at Reno, 1998 (unpublished).
[3]D. A. Benson, R. Schumer, M. M. Meerschaert, and S. W. Wheatcraft, Transp. Por. Media 42:211 (2001). · doi:10.1023/A:1006733002131
[4]D. A. Benson, S. W. Wheatcraft, and M. M. Meerschaert, Water Resour. Res. 36(6):1403 (2000). · doi:10.1029/2000WR900031
[5]A. V. Chechkin, R. Gorenflo and I. M. Sokolov, J. Phys. A 38:L679 (2005). · Zbl 1082.76097 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/42/L03
[6]A. V. Chechkin, V. Y. Gonchar, J. Klafter, R. Metzler, and L. V. Tanatarov, J. Sta. Phys. 115:1505 (2004). · Zbl 1157.82305 · doi:10.1023/B:JOSS.0000028067.63365.04
[7]S. N. Ethier and T. G. Kurtz, Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence, p. 380, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986.
[8]W. Feller, An introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971.
[9]R. Gorenflo and F. Mainardi, J. Anal. Appl. 18(2):231 (1999).
[10]R. Gorenflo, A. Vivoli, and F. Mainardi, Nonlinear Dynamics 38:101 (2004). · Zbl 1125.76067 · doi:10.1007/s11071-004-3749-5
[11]R. Gorenflo, F. Mainardi, D. Moretti, and P. Paradisi, Nonlinear Dynamics 29:129 (2002). · Zbl 1009.82016 · doi:10.1023/A:1016547232119
[12]R. Gorenflo, G. D. Fabritiis, and F. Mainardi, Phys. A 269:79 (2004).
[13]A. E. Hassan and M. M. Mohamed, J. Hyd. 275:242 (2002). · doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00046-5
[14]A. Janicki and A. Weron, Simulation and Chaotic Behavior of a-stable Stochastic Processes, p. 355, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1994.
[15]W. Kinzelbach, In: E. Custodio (Ed.), Groundwater Flow and Quality Modeling, pp. 227–245, Reidel Publishing Company, 1988.
[16]K. A. Klise, V. C. Tidwell, S. A. McKenna, and M. D. Chapin, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs 36(5):573 (2004).
[17]E. M. LaBolle, G. E. Fogg, and A. F. B. Tompson, Water Resour. Res. 32:583 (1996). · doi:10.1029/95WR03528
[18]E. M. LaBolle, J. Quastel, G. E. Fogg, and J. Gravner, Water Resour. Res. 36(3):651 (2000). · doi:10.1029/1999WR900224
[19]F. Liu, V. Anh, and I. Turner, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 166:209 (2004). · Zbl 1036.82019 · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2003.09.028
[20]M. M. Meerschaert and C. Tadjeran, Appl. Nume. Math. 56:80 (2006). · Zbl 1086.65087 · doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2005.02.008
[21]M. M. Meerschaert and C. Tadjeran, J. of Comp. and Appl. Math. 172:65 (2004). · Zbl 1126.76346 · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2004.01.033
[22]M. M. Meerschaert and H. P. Scheffler, Frac. Cal. Appl. Analy. 5(1):27 (2002).
[23]M. M. Meerschaert and H. P. Scheffler, Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Vectors: Heavy Tails in Theory and Practice, pp. 45–46, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
[24]M. M. Meerschaert, D. A. Benson, and B. Baeumer, Phys. Rev. E 59(5):5026 (1999). · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.59.5026
[25]M. M. Meerschaert, D. A. Benson, and B. Baeumer, Phys. Rev. E 63(2):12 (2001). · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.021112
[26]M. M. Meerschaert, J. Mortensen, and S. W. Wheatcraft, Phys. A., to appear (2006).
[27]R. Metzler and J. Klafter, J. Phys. A. 161:16 (2004).
[28]R. Metzler, E. Barkai, and J. Klafter, Europhys. Lett. 46(4):431 (1999). · doi:10.1209/epl/i1999-00279-7
[29]K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Wiley, New York, 1993.
[30]T. J. Osler, The Americ. Math. Mon. 78(6):645 (1971). · Zbl 0216.09303 · doi:10.2307/2316573
[31]H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation, p. 454, Springer & Verlag, New York, 1984.
[32]J. P. Roop, Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, 2004 (unpublished).
[33]G. Samorodnitsky and M. Taqqu, Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1994.
[34]H. Scher and M. Lax, Phys. Rev. B 7(10):4491 (1973). · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.7.4491
[35]R. Schumer, D. A. Benson, M. M. Meerschaert, and S. W. Wheatcraft, J. Contam. Hyd. 48:69 (2001). · doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00170-4
[36]I. M. Sokolov and R. Metzler, J. Phys. A 37: L609 (2004). · Zbl 1071.60033 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/46/L02
[37]D. Stroock, Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete 32:209 (1975). · Zbl 0292.60122 · doi:10.1007/BF00532614
[38]G. J. M. Uffink, In: H. E. Kobus and W. Kinzelbach (Eds.), Contaminant Transport in Groundwater, p. 283, Brookfield: A.A. Balkema, Vt., 1989.
[39]G. S. Weissmann, Y. Zhang, E. M. LaBolle, and G. E. Fogg, Water Resour. Res. 38(10), doi: 10.1029/2001WR000907.
[40]V. V. Yanovsky, A. V. Chechkin, D. Schertzer, and A. V. Tur, Phys. A 282:13 (2000). · doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00565-8