zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
 Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent. Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact. "Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks". au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted. Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff. "Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989. so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14. "Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic. dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles. py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses). la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
 a & b logic and a | b logic or !ab logic not abc* right wildcard "ab c" phrase (ab c) parentheses
Fields
 any anywhere an internal document identifier au author, editor ai internal author identifier ti title la language so source ab review, abstract py publication year rv reviewer cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
On approximations with finite precision in bundle methods for nonsmooth optimization. (English) Zbl 1094.90046
Summary: We consider the proximal form of a bundle algorithm for minimizing a nonsmooth convex function, assuming that the function and subgradient values are evaluated approximately. We show how these approximations should be controlled in order to satisfy the desired optimality tolerance. For example, this is relevant in the context of Lagrangian relaxation, where obtaining exact information about the function and subgradient values involves solving exactly a certain optimization problem, which can be relatively costly (and as we show, in any case unnecessary). We show that approximation with some finite precision is sufficient in this setting and give an explicit characterization of this precision. Alternatively, our result can be viewed as a stability analysis of standard proximal bundle methods, as it answers the following question: for a given approximation error, what kind of approximate solution can be obtained and how does it depend on the magnitude of the perturbation?
MSC:
 90C30 Nonlinear programming 49J52 Nonsmooth analysis (other weak concepts of optimality)