zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Modelling and optimization of average travel time for a metro line by simulation and response surface methodology. (English) Zbl 1155.90328
Summary: This research presents a modelling and solution approach based on discrete-event simulation and response surface methodology for dealing with average passenger travel time optimization problem inherent to the metro planning process. The objective is to find the headways optimizing passenger average travel time with a satisfactory rate of carriage fullness. Due to some physical constraints, traffic safety and legal requirements, vehicle speeds cannot be raised any further to decrease travel time. But travel time can be optimized by arranging headways (i.e. the time period between the departure times of two consecutive transportation vehicles) in a timetable. In the presented approach, simulation metamodels that best fit the data collected from the simulated experiments are constructed to describe the relationship between the responses (average travel time and rate of carriage fullness) and input factors (headways). Then, the Derringer-Suich multi-response optimization procedure is used to determine the optimal settings of the input factors that produce the minimum value of the average travel time by providing a proper rate of carriage fullness. This methodology is applied for a real metro line, and good quality solutions are obtained with reduced number of experiments that needed to provide sufficient information for statistically acceptable results.
90B06Transportation, logistics
[1]Assis, W. O.; Milani, B. E. A.: Generation of optimal schedules for metro lines using model predictive control, Automatica 40, 1397-1404 (2004) · Zbl 1076.90522 · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2004.02.021
[2]Box, G. E. P.; Wilson, K. B.: On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, Journal of royal statistical society series B 13, No. 1, 1-38 (1951) · Zbl 0043.34402
[3]Castillo, E. D.; Montgomery, D. C.; Mccarvile, D. R.: Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization, Journal of quality technology 28, 337-345 (1996)
[4]D’angelo, A.; Gastaldi, M.; Levialdi, N.: Performance analysis of a flexible manufacturing system: A statistical approach, International journal of production economics 56 – 57, 47-59 (1998)
[5]Derringer, G. C.; Suich, R.: Simultaneous optimization of several response variables, Journal of quality technology 12, No. 4, 214-219 (1980)
[6]Flamini, M.; Pacciarelli, D.: Real time management of a metro rail terminus, European journal of operational research (2007)
[7]Gentile, G.; Nguyen, S.; Pallottino, S.: Route choice on transit networks with online information at stops, Transportation science 39, 289-297 (2005)
[8]Gharbi, A.; Kenne, J. P.: Production and preventive maintenance rates control for a manufacturing system: an experimental design approach, International journal of production economics 65, 275-287 (2000)
[9]Guan, J. F.; Yang, H.; Wirasinghe, S. C.: Simultaneous optimization of transit line configuration and passenger line assignment, Transportation research part B 40, 885-902 (2006)
[10]Harrington, E. C.: The desirability function, Industrial quality control 21, No. 10, 494-498 (1965)
[11]Hooke, R.; Jeeves, T. A.: ”Direct search” solution of numerical and statistical problems, Journal of the association for computing machinery 8, No. 2, 212-229 (1961) · Zbl 0111.12501 · doi:10.1145/321062.321069
[12]Horng, H. C.; Cochran, J. K.: Project surface regions: A decision support methodology for multitasking workers assignment in JIT systems, Computers and industrial engineering 39, 159-171 (2001)
[13]Hu, J.; Shi, X.; Song, J.; Xu, Y.: Optimal design for urban mass transit network based on evolutionary algorithms, Lecture notes in computer science 3611, 1089-1100 (2005)
[14]Irizarry, M. D. L.A.; Wilson, J. R.; Trevino, J.: A flexible simulation tool for manufacturing-cell design. II: response surface analysis and case study, IIE transactions 33, 837-846 (2001)
[15]Kelton, W. D.; Sadowski, R. P.; Sadowski, D. A.: Simulation with arena, (2002)
[16]Kim, D.; Rhee, S.; Park, H.: Modelling and optimization of a GMA welding process by genetic algorithm and response surface methodology, International journal of production research 40, 1699-1711 (2002)
[17]Kleijnen, J. P. C.; Sargent, R. G.: Theory and methodology – A methodology for Fitting and validating metamodels in simulation, European journal of operational research 120, 14-29 (2000) · Zbl 0985.65007 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00392-0
[18]Li, J.P., 2000. Train station passenger flow study. In: Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1173 – 1176.
[19]Mahadevan, B.; Narendran, T. T.: Buffer levels and choice of material handling device in flexible manufacturing systems, European journal of operational research 69, 166-176 (1993) · Zbl 0800.90510 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90161-F
[20]Montgomery, D. C.: Design and analysis of experiments, (2001)
[21]Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C.: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, (1995)
[22]Pegden, C. D.; Shannon, R. E.; Sadowski, R. P.: Introduction to simulation using SIMAN, (1990)
[23]Sridharan, R.; Babu, A. S.: Multi-level scheduling decisions in a class of FMS using simulation based metamodels, Journal of the operational research society 49, 591-602 (1998) · Zbl 1131.90363
[24]Zhao, F.; Zeng, X.: Optimization of transit network layout and headway with a combined genetic algorithm and simulated annealing method, Engineering optimization 38, No. 6, 701-722 (2006)
[25]Zhao, F.; Zeng, X.: Optimization of transit route network, vehicle headways and timetables for large-scale transit networks, European journal of operational research 186, 841-855 (2008) · Zbl 1138.90350 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.005