zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Models for integrated pest control and their biological implications. (English) Zbl 1156.92046

Summary: Successful integrated pest management (IPM) control programmes depend on many factors which include host-parasitoid ratios, starting densities, timings of parasitoid releases, dosages and timings of insecticide applications and levels of host-feeding and parasitism. Mathematical models can help us to clarify and predict the effects of such factors on the stability of host-parasitoid systems, which we illustrate here by extending the classical continuous and discrete host-parasitoid models to include an IPM control programme. The results indicate that one of three control methods can maintain the host level below the economic threshold (ET) in relation to different ET levels, initial densities of host and parasitoid populations and host-parasitoid ratios.

The effects of host intrinsic growth rates and parasitoid searching efficiency on the host mean outbreak period can be calculated numerically from the models presented. The instantaneous pest killing rate of an insecticide application is also estimated from the models. The results imply that the modelling methods described can help in the design of appropriate control strategies and assist management decision-making. The results also indicate that a high initial density of parasitoids (such as in inundative releases) and high parasitoid inter-generational survival rates will lead to more frequent host outbreaks and, therefore, greater economic damage. The biological implications of this counter intuitive result are discussed.

90C59Approximation methods and heuristics
[1]Barclay, H. J.: Models for pest control using predator release, habitat management and pesticide release in combination, J. appl. Ecol. 19, 337 (1982)
[2]Barclay, H. J.: Models for pest control: complementary effects of periodic releases of sterile pests and parasitoids, Theor. popul. Biol. 32, 76 (1987)
[3]Beddington, J. R.; Free, C. A.; Lawton, J. H.: Dynamic complexity in predator – prey models framed in difference equations, Nature 255, 58 (1975)
[4]Beddington, J. R.; Free, C. A.; Lawton, J. H.: Characteristics of successful natural enemies in models of biological control of insect pests, Nature 273, 513 (1978)
[5]Burnett, T.: Effect of host distribution on the reproduction of encarsia formosa gahan (Hymenoptera: chalcidoidea), Can. entomol. 90, 179 (1958)
[6]Burnett, T.: Effects of initial densities and periods of infestation on the growth forms of a host and parasite population, Can. J. Zool. 38, 1063 (1960)
[7]Burnett, T.: Aspects of the interaction between a chalcid parasite and its aleurodid host, Can. J. Zool. 45, 539 (1967)
[8]Mansveld, M. H. Eggenkamp-Rotteveel; Van Lenteren, J. C.; Ellenbroek, J. M.; Woets, J.: The parasite – host relationship between encarsia formosa(Hym·,aphelinidae) and trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hom., aleyrodidae). XII. population dynamics of parasite and host in a large, commercial glasshouse and test of the parasite-introduction method used in The Netherlands, Z. ang. Entomol. 93, 113 (1982)
[9]Mansveld, M. H. Eggenkamp-Rotteveel; Van Lenteren, J. C.; Ellenbroek, J. M.; Woets, J.: The parasite – host relationship between encarsia formosa (Hym., aphelinidae) and trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hom., aleyrodidae). XII. population dynamics of the parasite and host in a large, commercial glasshouse and test of the parasite-introduction method used in The Netherlands (second part), Z. ang. Entomol. 93, 258 (1983)
[10]M.L. Flint, Integrated Pest Management for Walnuts, University of California Statewide Integrated Pest Management Project, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, second ed., University of California, Oakland, CA, Publication 3270, 1987.
[11]Foster, G. N.; Kelly, A.: Initial density of glasshouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), hemiptera) in relation to the success of suppression by encarsia formosa gahan (Hymenoptera) on glasshouse tomatoes, Hortic. res. 18, 55 (1978)
[12]Grasman, J.; Van Herwaarden, O. A.; Hemerik, L.; Van Lenteren, J. C.: A two-component model of host – parasitoid interactions: determination of the size of inundative releases of parasitoids in biological pest control, Math. biosci. 169, 207 (2001) · Zbl 0966.92026 · doi:10.1016/S0025-5564(00)00051-1
[13]Greathead, D. J.: Natural enemies of tropical locusts and grasshoppers: their impact and potential as biological control agents, Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers (1992)
[14]Hassell, M. P.: The dynamics of arthopod predator – prey systems, (1978)
[15]Hassell, M. P.: Insecticides in host – parasitoid interactions, Theor. popul. Biol. 26, 378 (1984) · Zbl 0549.92015 · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(84)90041-8
[16]Hassell, M. P.: Host – parasitoid population dynamics, J. anim. Ecol. 69, 543 (2000)
[17]Hassell, M. P.: The spatial and temporal dynamics of host – parasitoid interactions, (2000)
[18]Hassell, M. P.; May, R. M.: Stability in insect host-parasite models, J. anim. Ecol. 42, 693 (1973)
[19]Hoddle, M. S.; Van Driesche, R. G.; Sanderson, J. P.: Biological control of bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: aleyrodidae) on poinsettia with inundative releases of encarsia formosa ’beltsville strain’ (Hymenoptera: aphelinidae): can parasitoid reproduction augment inundative releases?, J. econ. Entomol. 90, 910 (1997)
[20]Hoddle, M. S.; Van Driesche, R. G.; Sanderson, J. P.: Biology and use of the whitefly parasitoid encarsia formosa, Annu. rev. Entomol. 43, 645 (1997)
[21]Hoffmann, M. P.; Frodsham, A. C.: Natural enemies of vegetable insect pests, (1993)
[22]Holling, C. S.: The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly, Can. entomol. 91, 293 (1959)
[23]Holling, C. S.: Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Can. entomol. 91, 385 (1959)
[24]Jones, W. A.; Greenberg, S. M.; Legaspi, J. R.: The effect of varying bemisia argentifolii and eretmocerus mundus ratios on parasitism, Biocontrol 44, 13 (1999)
[25]Lotka, A. J.: Undamped oscillations derived from the law of mass action, J. am. Chem. soc. 42, 1595 (1920)
[26]May, R. M.; Hassell, M. P.; Anderson, R. M.; Tonkyon, D. W.: Density dependence in host – parasitoid models, J. anim. Ecol. 50, 855 (1981)
[27]Metcalf, R. L.; Luckman, W.: Introduction to insect pest management, (1975)
[28]Mills, N. J.; Getz, W. M.: Modelling the biological control of insect pests: a review of host – parasitoid models, Ecol. model. 92, 121 (1996)
[29]Murdoch, W. W.; Oaten, A.: Predation and population stability, Adv. ecol. Res. 9, 2 (1975)
[30]Murdoch, W. W.; Chesson, J.; Chesson, P. L.: Biological control in theory and practice, Am. nat. 125, 344 (1985)
[31]Murray, J. D.: Mathematical biology I: An introduction, (2002)
[32]Nicholson, A. J.; Bailey, V. A.: The balance of animal populations. Part I, Proc. zool. Soc. lond. 3, 551 (1935)
[33]Parker, F. D.: Management of pest populations by manipulating densities of both host and parasites through periodic releases, Biological control (1971)
[34]Parrella, M. P.; Paine, T. D.; Bethke, J. A.; Hall, J.: Evaluation of encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: aphelinidae) for biological control of sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: aleyrodidae) on poinsettia, Environ. entomol. 20, 713 (1991)
[35]Pedigo, L. P.: Entomology and pest management, (1996)
[36]Pedigo, L. P.; Higley, L. G.: A new perspective of the economic injury level concept and environmental quality, Am. entomol. 38, 12 (1992)
[37]Rumei, X.; Van Lenteren, J. C.; Huisman, P.: Parasitism of whitefly by encarsia formosa at different release ratios, IOBC/WPRS bull. 10, 188 (1987)
[38]Stinner, R. E.: Efficacy of inundative releases, A. res. Ent. 22, 515 (1977)
[39]Summers, T. E.; King, E. G.; Martin, D. F.; Jackson, R. D.: Biological control of diatraea sacchanalis in Florida by periodic releases of lixophaga diatraeae, Entomophaga 4, 359 (1976)
[40]Simmonds, F. J.: The occurrence of superparasitism in nemeritis canescens, Grav. rev. Canad. biol. 2, 15 (1943)
[41]Tang, S. Y.; Chen, L. S.: Modelling and analysis of integrated pest management strategy, Discrete contin. Dyn. syst. B 4, 759 (2004) · Zbl 1114.92074 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.759
[42]Tang, S. Y.; Cheke, R. A.: State-dependent impulsive models of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies and their dynamic consequences, J. math. Biol. 50, 257 (2005) · Zbl 1080.92067 · doi:10.1007/s00285-004-0290-6
[43]Tang, S. Y.; Xiao, Y. N.; Chen, L. S.; Cheke, R. A.: Integrated pest management models and their dynamical behavior, Bull. math. Biol. 67, 115 (2005)
[44]Van Lenteren, J. C.: Integrated pest management in protected crops, Integrated pest management (1995)
[45]Van Lenteren, J. C.: Measures of success in biological control of arthropods by augmentation of natural enemies, Measures of success in biological control (2000)
[46]Van Lenteren, J. C.; Van Roermund, H. J. W.; Sutterlin, S.: Biological control of greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) with the parasitoid encarsia formosa: how does it work?, Biol. control 6, 1 (1996)
[47]Van Lenteren, J. C.; Woets, J.: Biological and integrated control in greenhouses, Annu. rev. Entomol. 33, 239 (1988)
[48]Volterra, V.: Variations and fluctuations of a number of individuals in animal species living together, Animal ecology (1931)
[49]Waage, J. K.; Hassell, M. P.; Godfray, H. C. J.: The dynamics of pest – parasitoid – insecticide interactions, J. appl. Ecol. 22, 825 (1985)
[50]White, K. A. J.; Wilson, K.: Modelling density-dependent resistance in insect – pathogen interactions, Theor. popul. Biol. 56, 163 (1999) · Zbl 0978.92029 · doi:10.1006/tpbi.1999.1425
[51]Wylie, H. G.: Delayed development of microctonus vittatae (Hymenoptera: braconidae) in superparasitized adults of phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: chrysomelidae), Can. entomol. 115, 441 (1983)
[52]Xiao, Y. N.; Den Bosch, F. Van: The dynamics of an eco-epidemic model with biological control, Ecol. model. 168, 203 (2003)
[53]Yano, E.: A simulation study of population interaction between the greenhouse whitefly, trialeurodes vaporariorum westw. (Homoptera: aleyrodidae), and the parasitoid encarsia formosa gahan (Hymenoptera: aphelinidae). I. description of the model, Res. popul. Ecol. 31, 73 (1989)
[54]Yano, E.: A simulation study of population interaction between the greenhouse whitefly trialeurodes vaporariorum westwood (Homoptera: aleyrodidae) and the parasitoids encarsia formosa gahan (Hymenoptera: aphelinidae). II. simulation analysis of population dynamics and strategy of biological control, Res. popul. Ecol. 31, 89 (1989)