zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Competitive strategies and market segmentation for suppliers with substitutable products. (English) Zbl 1210.91054
Summary: This research studies the competition between two coexisting suppliers in a two-echelon supply chain. The suppliers have different inventory cost structures (holding cost and setup cost). Each supplier offers one type of the two substitutable products to multiple buyers. Buyers’ preferences between the substitutable products differ. Each buyer has a particular order profile (order frequency and quantity). A buyer chooses between the suppliers based on the prices offered by both suppliers and his/her own preference. A Hotelling-type model is used to describe buyers’ preferences for the products. We are able to describe the conditions for buyers to switch between the suppliers, and therefore spot the buyer groups that may or may not switch when the suppliers compete. Pricing strategies for different buyer groups are suggested to the competitive suppliers accordingly. Furthermore, equilibrium prices, market segments, and overall profits for the suppliers are revealed based on Game Theory. An algorithm is also proposed to forecast buyers’ reactions to suppliers’ pricing strategies given the buyers’ order profiles and preferences between the substitutable products.
MSC:
91B26Market models (auctions, bargaining, bidding, selling, etc.)
90B05Inventory, storage, reservoirs
91A80Applications of game theory
References:
[1]Berger, P. D.; Gerstenfeld, A.; Zeng, A. Z.: How many suppliers are best? a decision-analysis approach, Omega: an international journal of management science, No. 32, 9-15 (2004)
[2]Berger, P. D.; Zeng, A. Z.: Single versus multiple sourcing in the presence of risks, Journal of the operational research society 57, No. 3, 250-261 (2006) · Zbl 1089.90031 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601982
[3]Bloch, F.; Manceau, D.: Persuasive advertising in hotelling’s model of product differentiation, International journal of industrial organization 17, No. 4, 557-574 (1999)
[4]Chen, J.; Yao, D. D.; Zheng, S.: Optimal replenishment and rework with multiple unreliable supply sources, Operations research 49, No. 3, 430-443 (2001) · Zbl 1163.90454 · doi:10.1287/opre.49.3.430.11214
[5]Chen, Y. X.; Joshi, Y. V.; Raju, J. S.; Zhang, Z. J.: A theory of combative advertising, Marketing science 28, No. 1, 1-19 (2009)
[6]Chiang, W. Y. K.; Monahan, G. E.: Managing inventories in a two-echelon dual-channel supply chain, European journal of operational research 162, No. 2, 325-341 (2002) · Zbl 1071.90503 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.062
[7]Chioveanu, I.: Advertising, brand loyalty and pricing, Games and economic behavior 64, No. 1, 68-80 (2008) · Zbl 1152.91441 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2007.12.004
[8]Choi, S. C.: Price competition in a channel structure with common retailer, Marketing science 10, No. 4, 271-296 (1991)
[9]Choi, S. C.: Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel, Journal of retailing 72, No. 2, 117-134 (1996)
[10]D’aspremont, C.; Gabszewicz, J. J.; Thisse, J. F.: On hotelling’s ”stability in competition”, Econometrica 47, No. 5, 1145-1151 (1979)
[11]Gallay, O.; Hongler, M. O.: Market sharing dynamics between two service providers, European journal of operational research 190, No. 1, 241-254 (2008) · Zbl 1146.91019 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.018
[12]Granot, D.; Granot, F.; Raviv, T.: On competitive sequential location in a network with a decreasing demand intensity, European journal of operational research 205, No. 2, 301-312 (2010) · Zbl 1188.90048 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.021
[13]Hoyt, D., Lucent Technologies: Global supply chain management. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA 2001, Case number: GS-01.
[14]Matsubayashi, N.; Yamada, Y.: A note on price and quality competition between asymmetric firms, European journal of operational research 187, No. 2, 571-581 (2008) · Zbl 1149.90052 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.021
[15]Munson, C. L.; Rosenblatt, M. J.: Coordinating a three-level supply chain with quantity discounts, IIE transactions 33, No. 5, 371-384 (2001)
[16]O’brien, D. P.; Shaffer, G.: On the dampening-of-competition effect of exclusive dealing, Journal of industrial economics 41, No. 2, 215-221 (1993)
[17]Ruiz-Torres, A. J.; Mahmoodi, F.: A supplier allocation model considering delivery failure, maintenance and supplier cycle costs, International journal of production economics 103, No. 2, 755-766 (2006)
[18]Ruiz-Torres, A. J.; Mahmoodi, F.: The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures, Omega: an international journal of management science 35, No. 1, 104-115 (2007)
[19]Samuelson, W.; Zeckhauser, R.: Status quo bias in decision making, Journal of risk and uncertainty 1, No. 1, 7-59 (1988)
[20]Shaffer, G.; Zettelmeyer, F.: Advertising in a distribution channel, Marketing science 23, No. 4, 619-628 (2004)
[21]Smith, N. R.; Garza, D.; Hasenbein, J. J.: Effect of delivery timing interaction and disasters on co-supplier evaluation, International journal of production research 44, No. 9, 1845-1862 (2006)
[22]Shy, Oz: A quick-and-easy method for estimating switching costs, International journal of industrial organization 20, No. 1, 71-87 (2002)
[23]Subramaniam, R.; Gal-Or, E.: Quantity discounts in differentiated consumer product markets, Marketing science 28, No. 1, 180-192 (2009)
[24]Wagner, S. M.; Friedl, G.: Supplier switching decisions, European journal of operational research 183, No. 2, 700-717 (2007) · Zbl 1205.90163 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.036
[25]Wagner, S. M.; Bode, C.; Koziol, P.: Supplier default dependencies: empirical evidence from the automotive industry, European journal of operational research 199, No. 1, 150-161 (2009) · Zbl 1176.90326 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.012
[26]Xia, Y.; Chen, B.; Kouvelis, P.: Market-based supply chain coordination by matching suppliers’ cost structure with buyers’ order profile, Management science 54, No. 11, 1861-1875 (2008) · Zbl 1232.91335 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0900
[27]Xiao, T.; Qi, X.: Price competition, cost and demand disruptions and coordination of a supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing retailers, Omega: an international journal of management science 36, No. 5, 741-753 (2008)
[28]Yu, H.; Zeng, A. Z.; Zhao, L.: Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks, Omega: an international journal of management science 37, No. 3, 788-800 (2009)
[29]Yue, J.; Xia, Y.; Tran, T.; Chen, B.: Using frontier portfolios to improve make-to-order operations, Production and operations management 18, No. 2, 226-239 (2009)