zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Comment on “Investment timing under incomplete information”. (English) Zbl 1213.60083
Summary: In a recent contribution to this journal, J.-P. Décamps et al. [Math. Oper. Res. 30, No. 2, 472–500 (2005): erratum ibid. 34, No. 1, 255–256 (2009; Zbl 1082.91048)] analyze the decision of when to invest in a project whose value is perfectly observable but driven by a parameter that is unknown to the decision maker ex ante. Using filtering and martingale techniques, they find that (i) the decision maker always benefits from an uncertain drift relative to an average drift situation, and (ii) drift uncertainty unambiguously delays investment. Using the principle of smooth fit, I derive an analytical solution to the problem and give a numerical example that shows that both claims do not hold true in general. My analysis shows that the impact of drift uncertainty on the value of the option to invest and the optimal timing of investment is governed by two separate effects: the impact of uncertainty per se and the impact of learning. In particular, the results of [loc. cit.] only hold true if the latter outweighs the former.
MSC:
60G40Stopping times; optimal stopping problems; gambling theory
60G35Signal detection and filtering (stochastic processes)