zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Multiple spacecraft rendezvous maneuvers by differential drag and low thrust engines. (English) Zbl 1223.70071
Summary: A novel two-phase hybrid controller is proposed to optimize propellant consumption during multiple spacecraft rendezvous maneuvers in Low Earth Orbit. This controller exploits generated differentials in aerodynamic drag on each involved chaser spacecraft to effect a propellant-free trajectory near to the target spacecraft during the first phase of the maneuver, and then uses a fuel optimal control strategy via continuous low-thrust engines to effect a precision dock during the second phase. In particular, by varying the imparted aerodynamic drag force on each of the chaser spacecraft, relative differential accelerations are generated between each chaser and the target spacecraft along two of the three translational degrees of freedom. In order to generate this required differential, each chaser spacecraft is assumed to include a system of rotating flat panels. Additionally, each chaser spacecraft is assumed to have continuous low-thrust capability along the three translational degrees of freedom and full-axis attitude control. Sample simulations are presented to support the validity and robustness of the proposed hybrid controller to variations in the atmospheric density along with different spacecraft masses and ballistic coefficients. Furthermore, the proposed hybrid controller is validated against a complete nonlinear orbital model to include relative navigation errors typical of carrier-phase differential GPS (CDGPS). Limitations of the proposed controller appear relative to the target spacecraft’s orbit eccentricity and a general characterization of the atmospheric density. Bounds on these variables are included to provide a framework within which the proposed hybrid controller can effect an extremely low propellant rendezvous of multiple chaser spacecraft to a desired target spacecraft.
MSC:
70M20Orbital mechanics (general mechanics)
References:
[1]Bordner R.E., Wiesel W.E.: Trajectory estimation for satellites clusters. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 29(1), 172–178 (2006) · doi:10.2514/1.19693
[2]Bevilacqua R., Romano M.: Optimal guidance of proximity maneuvers for a spacecraft with hybrid on-off continuous and impulsive thrust. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(4), 1175–1178 (2007) · doi:10.2514/1.27716
[3]Bevilacqua R., Romano M.: Rendezvous Maneuvers of multiple spacecraft using differential drag under J2 perturbation. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 31(6), 1595–1607 (2008) · doi:10.2514/1.36362
[4]Bevilacqua, R., Romano, M., Curti, F.: Decoupled-natural-dynamics model for the Relative Motion of two spacecraft without and with J2 perturbation. Accepted for publication, to appear on the Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory (2009)
[5]Campbell M.E.: Planning Algorithm for Multiple Satellite Clusters. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26(5), 770–780 (2003) · doi:10.2514/2.5111
[6]Clohessy W.H., Wiltshire R.S.: Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J. Aerosp. Sci. 27(9), 653–658 (1960) · doi:10.2514/8.8704
[7]De Ruiter, A., Lee, J., Ng, A.: A Fault-tolerant magnetic spin stabilizing controller for the JC2Sat-FF Mission. AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 18–21 August 2008.
[8]Ferguson, P., et al.: Formation flying experiments on the Orion. AIAA Space 2001–conference and exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 28–30 August 2001.
[9]Guelman M., Aleshin M.: Optimal bounded low-thrust rendezvous with fixed terminal-approach direction. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 24(2), 378–385 (2001) · doi:10.2514/2.4722
[10]Humi, M., Carter, T.: Fuel-optimal rendezvous in a central force field with linear drag. Paper AAS 01-236, pp. 1875–1892 (2001)
[11]Kumar, B.S., Ng, A.: A bang-bang control approach to maneuver spacecraft in a formation with differential drag. AIAA Guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 18–21 August 2008.
[12]Kumar K.D., Bang H.C., Tahk M.J.: Satellite formation flying using along-track thrust. Acta Astronaut. 61, 553–564 (2007) · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.069
[13]Leonard, C.L. Formation keeping of spacecraft via differential drag. M.Sc. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1986)
[14]Leonard C.L., Hollister W.M., Bergmann E.V.: Orbital formation keeping with differential drag. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 12(1), 108–113 (1989) · doi:10.2514/3.20374
[15]Palmerini, G.B., Sgubini S., Taini, G.: Spacecraft orbit control using air drag. Paper IAC-05-C1.6.10 (2005)
[16]Pontryagin L.S., Boltjanskiy V.G., Gamkrelidze R.V., Mishenko E.F.: The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, pp. 27–35. Willey-Interscience, New York, NY (1969)
[17]Schweighart S.A., Sedwick R.J.: High-fidelity linearized J 2 model for satellite formation flight. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 25(6), 1073–1080 (2002) · doi:10.2514/2.4986
[18]Starin, R.S., Yedavalli, R.K., Sparks, A.G.: Spacecraft formation flying maneuvers using linear-quadratic regulation with no radial axis input. AIAA Paper 2001-4029, AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Montreal, Canada (2001)
[19]Vallado D.A.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 2nd edn. Microcosm Press, Hawthorne (2004)
[20]Winetraub, Y., Tamir, R.: Using Differential Drag for Management of Nano-Satellite Constellations. http://netquire.com/insa/docs/UsingDifferentialDrag.pdf (2009).