×

How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). (English) Zbl 0958.91514

Summary: Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) is one method to support environmental information needs by multi-attribute product evaluations. LCA describes the environmental effects associated with a product, process or activity over its whole life cycle by calculating the material and energy requirements as well as emissions to air, water and soil and by assessing the environmental impacts of those. An LCA study has both objective and subjective steps. So far, LCA has been developed without much consideration of the literature on decision modelling. We want to show that approaches and tools from decision analysis would be beneficial both in planning of an LCA study and in the interpretation and understanding of the results. We describe the LCA methodology and application, and discuss how the integration of decision analysis and LCA could improve LCA as a tool for decision making. We use an LCA study on beverage packaging systems to illustrate the new approach.

MSC:

91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ahbe, S.; Braunschweig, A.; Müller-Wenk, R., Methodik für Ökobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung, (Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 133 (1990), Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft. BUWAL: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft. BUWAL Bern)
[2] BUS, Ökobilanzen von Packstoffen, (Schriftenreihe Umweltschutz Nr. 24 (1984), Bundesamt für Umweltschutz: Bundesamt für Umweltschutz Bern)
[3] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444 (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[4] Consoli, F.; Allen, D.; Boustead, I.; Fava, J.; Franklin, W.; Quay, B.; Parrish, R.; Perriman, R.; Postlewhaite, D.; Seguin, J.; Vigon, B., Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A ‘code of practice’, (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry workshop report. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry workshop report, 31 March-3 April, Sesimbra, Portugal (1993))
[5] Edwards, W., How to use multi-attribute utility measurement for social decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7, 326-340 (1977)
[6] Finnveden, G.; Andersson-Sköld, Y.; Samuelsson, M.-O.; Zetterberg, L.; Lindfors, L-G., Classification (impact analysis) in connection with life cycle assessment — A preliminary study, (Product Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Methodology, Nord 1992:9 (1992)), 172-231, Århus, Denmark
[7] Fischer, G. W., Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multi-attribute value models, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 3, 252-266 (1995)
[8] Guinée, J. B.; Udo de Haes, H. A.; Huppes, G., Quantitative life cycle assessment of products — 1: Goal definition and inventory, Journal of Cleaner Production, 1, 1, 3-13 (1993)
[9] Guinée, J. B.; Heijungs, R.; Udo de Haes, H. A.; Huppes, G., Quantitative life cycle assessment of products — 2: Classification, valuation and improvement analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 1, 2, 81-91 (1993)
[10] Guinée, J. B.; Heijungs, R., A proposal for the classification of toxic substances within the framework of life cycle assessment of products, Chemosphere, 26, 1925-1944 (1995)
[11] Guinée, J. B.; Heijungs, R., A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life cycle assessment, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 14, 6 (1995)
[12] Heijungs, R., Valuation: A societal approach, (Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress. Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress, 11-14 April. Brussels (1994)), 107-113
[13] Huang, J. P.; Poh, K. L.; Ang, B. W., Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling, Energy, 20, 9, 843-855 (1995)
[14] Hämäläinen, R. P., Computer assisted energy policy analysis in the parliament of Finland, Interfaces, 18, 4, 12-23 (1988)
[15] Hämäläinen, R. P., Facts or values — How do parliamentarians and experts see nuclear power?, Energy Policy, 19, 5, 464-472 (1991)
[16] Hämäläinen, R. P., Decision analysis makes its way into environmental policy in Finland, OR/MS Today, 40-43 (1992), June
[17] Hämäläinen, R. P.; Lauri, H., HIPRE 3+ decision support software v. 3.13, (Users guide (1995), Helsinki University of Technology, Systems Analysis Laboratory)
[18] Hämäläinen, R. P.; Leikola, O., Spontaneous decision conferencing with top-level politicians, OR Insight, 9, 1, 24-28 (1996)
[19] Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives — Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976), John Wiley and Sons: John Wiley and Sons New York · Zbl 0488.90001
[20] Keeney, R. L., Structuring objectives for problems of public interest, Operations Research, 36, 3, 396-405 (1988)
[21] Keeney, R. L., Using values in operations research, Operations Research, 42, 5, 793-813 (1994)
[22] Keoleian, G. A.; Koch, J. E.; Menerey, D., Life cycle design framework and demonstration projects, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-95/107 (1995), Cincinnati, Ohio
[23] Lindeijer, E., Draft chapter 7 of WIA report on impact assessment: Valuation in LCA, August 1995 (1995), Internet
[24] Lindfors, L.-G.; Christiansen, K.; Hoffman, L.; Virtanen, Y.; Junttila, V.; Hanssen, O.-J.; Rønning, A.; Ekvall, T.; Finnveden, G., Impact assessment, LCA-Nordic Technical Report 10, Special Reports 1-2. Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord 1995:503 (1995), Copenhagen
[25] Lindfors, L.-G.; Christiansen, K.; Hoffman, L.; Virtanen, Y.; Junttila, V.; Hanssen, O.-J.; Rønning, A.; Ekvall, T.; Finnveden, G., Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment, Nordic Council of Ministers, Nord 1995:20 (1995), Copenhagen
[26] Marttunen, M.; Hämäläinen, R. P., Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment, European Journal of Operational Research, 87, 3, 551-563 (1996) · Zbl 0915.90193
[27] Müller-Wenk, R., The ecoscarcity method as a valuation instrument within the SETAC-framework, (Integrating impact assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress. Integrating impact assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress, 11-14 April, Brussels (1994)), 115-120
[28] Von Nitzsch, R.; Weber, M., The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multi-attribute utility measurements, Management Science, 39, 937-943 (1993) · Zbl 0800.90071
[29] Powell, J. C.; Pidgeon, S., Valuation within LCA: a multicriteria approach, (Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress. Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress, 11-14 April, Brussels (1994)), 149-153
[30] Pöyhönen, M.; Hämäläinen, R. P., Notes on the weighting biases in value trees, (Systems Analysis Laboratory Research Report A63 (1996), Helsinki University of Technology)
[31] Pöyhönen, M.; Hämäläinen, R. P.; Salo, A. A., An experiment on the numerical modeling of verbal ratio statements, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 1-10 (1997) · Zbl 0892.90001
[32] Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill New York · Zbl 1176.90315
[33] Salo, A. A.; Hämäläinen, R. P., Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements, Operations Research, 40, 6, 1053-1061 (1991) · Zbl 0765.90059
[34] Salo, A. A.; Hämäläinen, R. P., Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons, European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 458-475 (1991) · Zbl 0909.90006
[35] Salo, A. A.; Hämäläinen, R. P., On the measurement of preference in the analytic hierarchy process, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (1997), (forthcoming) · Zbl 1078.91525
[36] Seiford, L. M.; Thrall, R. M., Recent developments in DEA, Journal of Econometrics, 46, 7-38 (1990) · Zbl 0716.90015
[37] Steen, B.; Ryding, S.-O., The EPS enviro-accounting method, (IVL Report B1080 (1992), Swedish Environmental Research Institute: Swedish Environmental Research Institute Gothenburg, Sweden)
[38] Stewart, T. J., Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 654-665 (1996) · Zbl 0863.90006
[39] Tukker, A., Review of quantitative valuation methods, (Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress. Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress, 11-14 April, Brussels (1994)), 127-132
[40] Vigon, B. W.; Tolle, D. A.; Cornaby, B. W.; Latham, H. C.; Harrison, C. L.; Boguski, T. L.; Hunt, R. G.; Sellers, J. D., Life-cycle assessment: Inventory guidelines and principles, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-92/245 (1993), Cincinnati, Ohio
[41] Virtanen, Y.; Mälkki, H.; Hakala, S.; Leppänen, A., Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts of Finnish beverage packaging systems, Association of Packaging Technology and Research, Report 43 (1995), Helsinki, Finland
[42] Volkwein, S.; Klöpffer, W., The valuation step within LCA — Part I: General principles, International Journal of LCA, 1, 1, 36-39 (1996)
[43] Weber, M.; Borcherding, K., Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 67, 1-12 (1993)
[44] Von Winterfeldt, D.; Edwards, W., Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.