×

The adaptive value of tandem communication in ants: insights from an agent-based model. (English) Zbl 1467.92247

Summary: Social animals often share information about the location of resources, such as a food source or a new nest-site. One well-studied communication strategy in ants is tandem running, whereby a leader guides a recruit to a resource. Tandem running is considered an example of animal teaching because a leader adjusts her behaviour and invests time to help another ant to learn the location of a resource more efficiently. Tandem running also has costs, such as waiting inside the nest for a leader and a reduced walking speed. Whether and when these costs outweigh the benefits of tandem running is not well understood. We developed an agent-based simulation model to investigate the conditions that favour communication by tandem running during foraging. We predicted that the spatio-temporal distribution of food sources, colony size and the ratio of scouts and recruits affect colony foraging success. Our results suggest that tandem running is favoured when food sources are hard to find, differ in energetic value and are long lasting. These results mirror the findings of simulations of honeybee communication. Scouts locate food sources faster than tandem followers in some environments, suggesting that tandem running may fulfil the criteria of teaching only in some situations. Furthermore, tandem running was only beneficial above a critical colony size threshold. Taken together, our model suggests that there is a considerable parameter range that favours colonies that do not use communication by tandem running, which could explain why many ants with small colony sizes forage solitarily.

MSC:

92D50 Animal behavior

Software:

NetLogo
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI DOI

References:

[1] Al Toufailia, H.; Grüter, C.; Ratnieks, F. L.W.; Herberstein, M., Persistence to unrewarding feeding locations by honeybee foragers (Apis mellifera): the effects of experience, resource profitability and season, Ethology, 119, 12, 1096-1106 (2013)
[2] Beckers, R.; Goss, S.; Deneubourg, J. L.; Pasteels, J. M., Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy, Psyche, 96, 3-4, 239-256 (1989)
[3] Beekman, M.; Lew, J. B., Foraging in honeybees - when does it pay to dance?, Behav. Ecol., 19, 2, 255-261 (2008)
[4] Caro, T. M.; Hauser, M. D., Is there teaching in nonhuman animals?, Q. Rev. Biol., 67, 2, 151-174 (1992)
[5] Carroll, C. R.; Janzen, D. H., Ecology of foraging by ants, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 1, 231-257 (1973)
[6] Collett, M.; Chittka, L.; Collett, T., Spatial memory in insect navigation, Curr. Biol., 23, 17, R789-R800 (2013)
[7] Czaczkes, T. J.; Czaczkes, B.; Iglhaut, C.; Heinze, J., Composite collective decision-making, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 1809, 20142723 (2015)
[8] Czaczkes, T. J.; Grüter, C.; Ratnieks, F. L.W., Trail pheromones: an integrative view of their role in colony organization, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 60, 581-599 (2015)
[9] Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X.; Dornhaus, A.; Houston, A. I.; McNamara, J. M.; Collins, E. J.; Franks, N. R., The hidden cost of information in collective foraging, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 272, 1573, 1689-1695 (2005)
[10] Donaldson-Matasci, M. C.; Dornhaus, A., How habitat affects the benefits of communication in collectively foraging honey bees, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 66, 4, 583-592 (2012)
[11] Donaldson-Matasci, M. C.; DeGrandi-Hoffman, G.; Dornhaus, A., Bigger is better: honeybee colonies as distributed information-gathering systems, Anim. Behav., 85, 3, 585-592 (2013)
[12] Dornhaus, A.; Chittka, L., Why do honey bees dance?, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 55, 4, 395-401 (2004)
[13] Dornhaus, A.; Klügl, F.; Oechslein, C.; Puppe, F.; Chittka, L., Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model, Behav. Ecol., 17, 3, 336-344 (2006)
[14] Dornhaus, A.; Powell, S.; Bengston, S., Group size and its effects on collective organization, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 57, 1, 123-141 (2012)
[15] Franklin, E. L., The journey of tandem running: the twists, turns and what we have learned, Insectes Soc., 61, 1, 1-8 (2014)
[16] Franks, N. R.; Richardson, T., Teaching in tandem-running ants, Nature, 439, 7073, 153 (2006), 153
[17] Fresneau, D., Individual foraging and path fidelity in a ponerine antFourragement individuel et fidélité à la piste chez une fourmi Ponérine, Insectes Soc., 32, 2, 109-116 (1985)
[18] Glaser, S. M.; Grüter, C., Ants (Temnothorax nylanderi) adjust tandem running when food source distance exposes them to greater risks, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 72, 40 (2018)
[19] Glaser, S. M.; Feitosa, R. M.; Koch, A.; Goß, N.; Nascimento, F. S.; Grüter, C., Tandem communication improves ant foraging success in a highly competitive tropical habitat, Insectes Soc. (2021), in press
[20] Grüter, C.; Czaczkes, T. J., Communication in social insects and how it is shaped by individual experience, Anim. Behav., 151, 207-215 (2019)
[21] Grüter, C.; Ratnieks, F. L.W., Honeybee foragers increase the use of waggle dance information when private information becomes unrewarding, Anim. Behav., 81, 5, 949-954 (2011)
[22] Grüter, C.; Wüst, M.; Cipriano, A. P.; Nascimento, F. S., Tandem recruitment and foraging in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius), Neotrop. Entomol., 47, 6, 742-749 (2018)
[23] Heinze, J.; Foitzik, S.; Hippert, A.; Hölldobler, B., Apparent Dear-enemy Phenomenon and Environment-based Recognition Cues in the Ant Leptothorax nylanderi, Ethology, 102, 3, 510-522 (1996)
[24] Hingston, R. W.G., Instinct and intelligence (1929), Macmillan: Macmillan New York
[25] Hölldobler, B., Communication during foraging and nest-relocation in the African stink ant, Paltothyreus tarsatus Fabr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae), Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 65, 40-52 (1984)
[26] Hölldobler, B.; Wilson, E. O., The Ants (1990), The Belknap Press of Harward University: The Belknap Press of Harward University Cambridge, Massachusetts
[27] Hoppitt, W.; Laland, K. N., Social learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models (2013), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton
[28] I’Anson Price, R.; Dulex, N.; Vial, N.; Vincent, C.; Grüter, C., Honeybees forage more successfully without the “dance language” in challenging environments. Science, Advances, 5, 2, eaat0450 (2019)
[29] I’Anson Price, R.; Grüter, C., Why, when and where did honey bee dance communication evolve?, Front. Ecol. Evol., 3, 1-7 (2015)
[30] Jarau, S.; Hrncir, M., Food Exploitation by Social Insects: Ecological, Behavioral, and Theoretical Approaches (2009), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton, Florida
[31] Kaur, R.; Joseph, J.; Anoop, K.; Sumana, A., Characterization of recruitment through tandem running in an Indian queenless ant Diacamma indicum, R. Soc. Open Sci., 4, 1, 160476 (2017)
[32] Lanan, M., Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Myrmecological News, 20, 53 (2014)
[33] Mailleux, A.-C.; Deneubourg, J.-L.; Detrain, C., Regulation of ants’ foraging to resource productivity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 270, 1524, 1609-1616 (2003)
[34] Maschwitz, U.; Jessen, K.; Knecht, S., Tandem Recruitment and Trail Laying in the Ponerine Ant Diacamma rugosum: Signal Analysis, Ethology, 71, 30-41 (1986)
[35] Moglich, M.; Maschwitz, U.; Holldobler, B., Tandem calling: a new kind of signal in ant communication, Science, 186, 4168, 1046-1047 (1974)
[36] Ogle, D.H., Wheeler, P., Dinno, A. (2020) FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis.
[37] Planqué, R.; van den Berg, J. B.; Franks, N. R.; Adler, F. R., Recruitment strategies and colony size in ants, PLoS ONE, 5, 8, e11664 (2010)
[38] Pratt, S. C., Efficiency and regulation of recruitment during colony emigration by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 62, 8, 1369-1376 (2008)
[39] Quinet, Y.; Pasteels, J. M., Spatial specialization of the foragers and foraging strategy in Lasius fuliginosus (Latreille) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), Insectes Soc., 43, 4, 333-346 (1996)
[40] Reeves, D.D., Moreau, C.S. (2019) The evolution of foraging behavior in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). 14.
[41] Schürch, R.; Grüter, C.; Chaline, N., Dancing bees improve colony foraging success as long-term benefits outweigh short-term costs, PLoS ONE, 9, 8, e104660 (2014)
[42] Seeley, T. D., The wisdom of the hive: The social physiology of honey bee colonies (1995), Harward University Press: Harward University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts
[43] Seeley, T. D., Division of labor between scouts and recruits in honeybee foraging, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 12, 3, 253-259 (1983)
[44] Seeley, T. D.; Visscher, P. K., Assessing the benefits of cooperation in honeybee foraging: search costs, forage quality, and competitive ability, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 22, 4, 229-237 (1988)
[45] Sherman, G.; Visscher, P. K., Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing, Nature, 419, 6910, 920-922 (2002)
[46] Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry, Third edition. W. H. Freeman and company, New York.
[47] Sumpter, D.; Pratt, S., A modelling framework for understanding social insect foraging, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 53, 3, 131-144 (2003)
[48] Sumpter, D. J.T., Collective Animal Behavior (2010), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton · Zbl 1229.92085
[49] Traniello, J. F.A.; Hölldobler, B., Chemical communication during tandem running in Pachycondyla obscuricornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), J. Chem. Ecol., 10, 5, 783-794 (1984)
[50] Völkl, W.; Woodring, J.; Fischer, M.; Lorenz, M. W.; Hoffmann, K. H., Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences, Oecologia, 118, 4, 483-491 (1999)
[51] von Frisch, K., The dance language and orientation of bees (1967), Harvard University Press: Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts
[52] Wagner, T.; Bachenberg, L.; Glaser, S. M.; Oikonomou, A.; Linn, M.; Grüter, C., Large body size variation is associated with low communication success in tandem running ants, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 75, 4 (2021)
[53] Wilensky, U., NetLogo, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling (1999), Northwestern University: Northwestern University Evanston, IL, http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
[54] Wilensky, U.; Rand, W., An introduction to agent-based modeling: modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo (2015), The MIT Press: The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England
[55] Wilson, E. O., Communication by tandem running in the ant genus Cardiocondyla, Psyche, 66, 3, 29-34 (1959)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.