Noncompensatory preferences. (English) Zbl 0357.90004


91B06 Decision theory
Full Text: DOI


[1] Chipman, J. S., 1960, ?The Foundations of Utility?, Econometrica 28, 193-224. · Zbl 0173.48001 · doi:10.2307/1907717
[2] Coombs, C. H., 1964, A Theory of Data, Wiley, New York.
[3] Davidson, D., McKinsey, J. C. C., and Suppes, P., 1955, ?Outline of a Formal Theory of Value?, Philosophy of Science 22, 140-160. · doi:10.1086/287412
[4] Debreu, G., 1960, ?Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory?, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes (eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 16-26.
[5] Fishburn, P. C., 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0213.46202
[6] Fishburn, P. C., 1974, ?Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey?, Management Science 20, 1442-1471. · Zbl 0311.90007 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.20.11.1442
[7] Fishburn, P. C., 1975, ?Axioms for Lexicographic Preferences?, The Review of Economic Studies 42, 415-419. · Zbl 0326.90005 · doi:10.2307/2296854
[8] Green, P. E. and Wind, Y., 1973, Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing, Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois.
[9] Luce, R. D. and Tukey, J. W., 1964, ?Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement?, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 1-27. · Zbl 0166.42201 · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X
[10] MacCrimmon, K. R., 1973, ?An Overview of Multiple Objective Decision Making?, in J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, pp. 18-44.
[11] Schwartz, T., 1972, ?Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum?, Noûs 6, 97-117.
[12] Tversky, A., 1969, ?Intransitivity of Preferences?, Psychological Review 76, 31-48. · doi:10.1037/h0026750
[13] Weinstein, A. A., 1968, ?Individual Preference Intransitivity?, Southern Economic Journal 34, 335-343. · doi:10.2307/1055496
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.