×

Ramberg-Osgood material behavior expression and large deflections of Euler beams. (English) Zbl 07357397

Summary: Several assumptions are commonly made throughout the literature with regard to the mechanical expression of material behavior under a Ramberg-Osgood material model; specifically, the negligible effects of nonlinearity on the elastic behavior of the material. These assumptions do not reflect the complicated nonlinearity implied by the Ramberg-Osgood expression, which can lead to significant differences in the member model response from the true material behavior curve. With the proposed approach, new explicit results for Ramberg-Osgood materials are achieved without relying on these assumptions of material and model expression. The only assumptions present within the proposed model are the standard mechanical assumptions of an Euler beam. A general nonlinear moment-curvature relationship for monotone material behaviors is constructed. Large deflections of cantilever Euler beams with rectangular cross-sections under a combined loading are modeled. Numerical validation of this new method against results already given in the literature for the special cases of linear and power-law material behaviors are provided. An analysis is presented for three common material behavior relationships, with a focus on how these relationships are expressed through the deflection of members under the application of force within the model; this analysis clearly demonstrates that the sub-yield nonlinear behavior of the Ramberg-Osgood expression can be significant. The distinctions between material behavior expression demonstrated in this analysis have been long overlooked within the literature. This work addresses a gap between the modeling of Ramberg-Osgood material behaviors and the implementation of that model in mechanics.

MSC:

74-XX Mechanics of deformable solids
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bisshopp, KE, Drucker, DC. Large deflections of cantilever beams. Q Appl Math 1945; 3: 272-275. · Zbl 0063.00418
[2] Lewis, G, Monasa, F. Large deflections of cantilever beams of nonlinear materials. Comput Struct 1981; 14: 357-360.
[3] Lee, K. Large deflections of cantilever beams of non-linear elastic material under a combined loading. Int J Non Linear Mech 2002; 37: 439-443. · Zbl 1346.74105
[4] Borboni, A, De Santis, D. Large deflection of a non-linear, elastic, asymmetric Ludwick cantilever beam subjected to horizontal force, vertical force and bending torque at the free end. Meccanica 2014; 49: 1327-1336. · Zbl 1333.74050
[5] Teng, X, Wierzbicki, T. Folding of a plastic fibre under combined shear and compression. Thin Walled Struct 2004; 42: 803-826.
[6] Lee, JK, Lee, BK. Elastica of non-prismatic and nonlinear elastic cantilever beams under combined loading. Appl Sci 2019; 9: 877-889.
[7] Changizi, MA, Sahin, DE, Stiharu, I. A closed form solution for non-linear deflections of non-straight Ludwick type beams using Lie symmetry groups. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Mechatronics and Cyber-MixMechatronics, 2018.
[8] Ramberg, W, Osgood, WR. Description of stress strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note 902, National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics, 1943.
[9] Aitchison, CS, Miller, JA. Tensile and pack compressive tests of some sheets of aluminum alloy, 1025 carbon steel, and chromium-nickel steel. Technical Note 840, National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics, 1942.
[10] ASM International . Atlas of stress-strain curves. 2nd ed. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2002.
[11] Bildhauer, M, Fuchs, M. Continuity properties of the stress tensor in the 3-dimensional Ramberg/Osgood model. J Appl Anal 2007; 13: 209-233. · Zbl 1134.74008
[12] Ganji, DD, Sadighi, A, Tari, H, et al. Large deflections of a cantilever beam under point load using the homotopy perturbation method. Topol Methods Nonlinear Anal 2008; 31: 271-277. · Zbl 1163.35311
[13] Beik Mohammadlou, H, Ehteraei Toussi, H. Exact stress and deformation analysis in elastoplastic Ramberg-Osgood beam. Aerosp Sci Technol 2016; 58: 618-628.
[14] Kulvait, V. Mathematical analysis and computer simulations of deformation of nonlinear elastic bodies in the small strain range. PhD Thesis, Charles University, Czech Republic, 2017.
[15] Abaqus, Inc. SIMULIA—Abaqus theory guide. Palo Alto, CA: Abaqus, Inc. 2016, chapter 4.3.9.
[16] Szuladzinski, G. Bending of beams with nonlinear material characteristics. J Mech Des 1980; 102: 776-780.
[17] Prathap, G, Varadan, T. The inelastic large deformation of beams. J Appl Mech 1976; 43(4): 689-690.
[18] Papirno, RP. Computer analysis of stress-strain data: Program description and user instructions. Technical Report AMMRC TR 76-12, Defense Technical Information Center, 1976.
[19] Rasmussen, KJR. Full-range stress-strain curves for stainless steel alloys. J Constr Steel Res 2003; 59: 47-61.
[20] US Dept of Defense . Metallic materials and elements for aerospace vehicle structures. Washington, DC: US Dept of Defense, 1998.
[21] ASCE . Specifications for the design of cold-formed stainless steel structural members. Technical Report, ANSI/ASCE, New York, NY, 1991.
[22] Standards Australia . Cold-formed stainless steel structures. Technical Report AS/NZS4673, Standards Australia, Sydney, 2001.
[23] South African Bureau of Standards . Structural use of steel. Part 4: The design of cold-formed stainless steel structural members. Technical Report, South African Bureau of Standards, Praetoria, 1997.
[24] Neville, AM. Properties of concrete. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1987.
[25] Hight, TK, Brandeau, JF. Mathematical modeling of the stress-strain rate of bone using the Ramberg-Osgood equation. J Biomech 1983; 16: 445-450.
[26] Fairker, JE. A study of the strength of short and intermediate wood columns by experimental and analytical methods. US Forest Service Research Note FPL-028, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Products Laboratory Madison, WS, 1964.
[27] Faccioli, E, Esteva, L, Cervantes, R. Probabilistic analysis of nonlinear seismic response of stratified soil deposits. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1973.
[28] Nakai, K, Yokoyama, T. High strain-rate compressive properties and constitutive modeling of selected polymers. J Solid Mech Mater Eng 2012; 6: 713-741.
[29] Kuppusamy, T, Nanda, A, Reddy, JN. Materially nonlinear analysis of laminated composite plates. Compos Struct 1984; 2: 315-328.
[30] van der Laan, DC, McRae, DM, Weiss, JD. Effect of monotonic and cyclic axial tensile stress on the performance of superconducting \(CORC^®\) wires. Supercond Sci Tech 2019; 32: 054004.
[31] Yarger, JL, Cherry, BR, van der Vaart, A. Uncovering the structure-function relationship in spider silk. Nat Rev Mater 2018; 3: 18008.
[32] Gardner, L, Ashraf, M. Structural design for non-linear metallic materials. Eng Struct 2006; 28: 926-934.
[33] Real, E, Arrayago, I, Mirambell, E, et al. Comparative study of analytic expressions for the modelling of stainless steel behaviour. Thin Walled Struct 2014; 83: 2-11.
[34] Hertelé, S, De Waele, W, Denys, R, et al. Full-range stress-strain behaviour of contemporary pipeline steels. Part 1: Model description. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2012; 92: 34-40.
[35] Goodno, BJ, Gere, JM. Mechanics of materials. 9 ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2018, chapter 5.
[36] AK Steel . 304/304L stainless steel. Product Data Bulletin Revision, 25 April 2013.
[37] Beléndez, T, Neipp, C, Beléndez, A. Numerical and experimental analysis of a cantilever beam: A laboratory project to introduce geometric nonlinearity in mechanics of materials. Int J Eng Educ 2003; 19(6): 885-892.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.