×

Peridynamics boundary condition treatments via the pseudo-layer enrichment method and variable horizon approach. (English) Zbl 07357420

Summary: Peridynamics is a nonlocal theory that applies an integral term to represent the material response. Without a spatial differential term involved, peridynamics possesses certain advantages for solving discontinuity-involved problems. However, due to the reduction of stiffness, the deformation near the boundary region by peridynamics has a low accuracy compared to the local elastic deformation. Previous peridynamics boundary condition treatment enriches the stiffness on the boundary region by adding an artificial layer outside the domain boundary. However, this requires the deformation of the pseudo-layer to be pre-determined. In addition, the accuracy of the response on the physical domain depends largely on the accuracy of the pre-determined deformation on the pseudo-layer. Considering the fact that peridynamics reduces to local elasticity as the horizon size goes to zero, and previous researches indicate the potential advantage of boundary enrichment via the horizon varying approach, in this paper, peridynamics with a variable horizon is utilized as an efficient way to reduce the boundary-induced inaccuracy. Firstly, the pseudo-layer boundary condition treatments are discussed by using the symmetrical enrichment function and other extrapolation functions. Then, the variable horizon boundary condition treatment is introduced and a robust improvement of deformation accuracy on the boundary region is observed compared to other boundary condition treatments for both one- and two-dimensional examples. The variable horizon approach requires no additional pseudo-layer and the boundary conditions are applied directly on the physical boundary. Thus, the variable horizon approach is easy to implement and its computational cost is reduced.

MSC:

74-XX Mechanics of deformable solids
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Silling, S. Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solid 2000; 48: 175-209. · Zbl 0970.74030
[2] Silling, S, Epton, M, Weckner, O, et al. Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 2007; 88: 151-184. · Zbl 1120.74003
[3] Kilic, B. Peridynamic theory for progressive failure prediction in homogeneous and heterogeneous materials. PhD Thesis, University of Arizona, 2008.
[4] Silling, S, Askari, E. A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 2005; 83: 1526-1535.
[5] Seleson, P, Littlewood, DJ. Convergence studies in meshfree peridynamic simulations. Comput Math Appl 2016; 71: 2432-2448. · Zbl 1443.65253
[6] Zhou, K, Du, Q. Mathematical and numerical analysis of linear peridynamic models with nonlocal boundary conditions. SIAM J Numer Anal 2010; 48: 1759-1780. · Zbl 1220.82074
[7] Aksoylu, B, Celiker, F. Nonlocal problems with local Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. J Mech Mater Struct 2017; 12: 425-437.
[8] Yaghoobi, A, Chorzepa, MG. Formulation of symmetry boundary modeling in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics and coupling with finite element analysis. Math Mech Solid 2018; 23: 1156-1176. · Zbl 1401.74027
[9] Shojaei, A, Mossaiby, F, Zaccariotto, M, et al. An adaptive multi-grid peridynamic method for dynamic fracture analysis. Int J Mech Sci 2018; 144: 600-617.
[10] Nicely, C, Tang, S, Qian, D. Nonlocal matching boundary conditions for non-ordinary peridynamics with correspondence material model. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2018; 338: 463-490. · Zbl 1440.74033
[11] Wildman, RA, Gazonas, GA. A perfectly matched layer for peridynamics in one dimension. ARL-TR-5626, Army Research Laboratory Technical Report, Adelphi, MD, 2011.
[12] Wildman, RA, Gazonas, GA. A perfectly matched layer for peridynamics in two dimensions. J Mech Mater Struct 2012; 7: 765-781.
[13] Wang, L, Chen, Y, Xu, J, et al. Transmitting boundary conditions for 1D peridynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 2017; 110: 379-400. · Zbl 1375.74010
[14] Wu, CT. Kinematic constraints in the state-based peridynamics with mixed local/nonlocal gradient approximations. Computat Mech 2014; 54: 1255-1267. · Zbl 1311.74019
[15] Wu, CT, Ren, B. Localized particle boundary condition enforcements for the state-based peridynamics. Couple Syst Mech 2015; 4: 1-18.
[16] Chen, J, Tian, Y, Cui, X. Free and force vibration analysis of peridynamics bar with finite boundary conditions. Int J Appl Mech 2018; 10: 1850003.
[17] Madenci, E, Dorduncu, M, Barut, A, et al. Weak form of peridynamics for nonlocal essential and natural boundary conditions. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2018; 337: 598-631. · Zbl 1440.74030
[18] Silling, SA, Littlewood, DJ, Seleson, P. Variable horizon in a peridynamic medium. J Mech Mater Struct 2015; 10: 591-612.
[19] Seleson, P, Beneddine, S, Prudhomme, S. A force-based coupling scheme for peridynamics and classical elasticity. Computat Mater Sci 2013; 66: 34-49.
[20] Seleson, P, Ha, YD, Beneddine, S. Concurrent coupling of bond-based peridynamics and the Navier equation of classical elasticity by blending. Int J Multiscale Computat Eng 2015; 13: 91-113.
[21] Han, F, Lubineau, G. Coupling of nonlocal and local continuum models by the Arlequin approach. Int J Numer Meth Eng 2012; 89: 671-685. · Zbl 1242.74004
[22] Lubineau, G, Azdoud, Y, Han, F, et al. A morphing strategy to couple nonlocal to local continuum mechanics. J Mech Phys Solid 2012; 60: 1088-1102.
[23] Han, F, Lubineau, G, Azdoud, Y, et al. A morphing approach to couple state-based peridynamics with classical continuum mechanics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2016; 301: 336-358. · Zbl 1425.74079
[24] D’Elia, M, Li, X, Seleson, P, et al. A review of Local-to-Nonlocal coupling methods in nonlocal diffusion and nonlocal mechanics. arXiv:1912.06668, 2019.
[25] Seleson, P, Gunzburger, M, Parks, ML. Interface problems in nonlocal diffusion and sharp transitions between local and nonlocal domains. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2013; 266: 185-204. · Zbl 1286.74010
[26] Ren, H, Zhuang, X, Rabczuk, T. Dual horizon peridynamics: a stable solution to varying horizon. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2017; 318: 768-782. · Zbl 1439.74030
[27] Le, QV, Bobaru, F. Surface corrections for peridynamic models in elasticity and fracture. Computat Mech 2018; 61: 499-518. · Zbl 1446.74084
[28] Bobaru, F, Foster, JT, Geubelle, PH, et al. Handbook of peridynamic modeling. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. · Zbl 1351.74001
[29] Madenci, E, Oterkus, E. Peridynamic theory and its applications. Berlin: Springer, 2014. · Zbl 1295.74001
[30] Macek, RW, Silling, SA. Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 2007; 43: 1169-1178.
[31] Mitchell, JA, Silling, SA, Littlewood, DJ. A position-aware linear solid constitutive model for peridynamics. J Mech Mater Struct 2015; 10: 539-557.
[32] Oterkus, S. Peridynamics for the solution of multiphysics problems. PhD Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2015.
[33] Seleson, P, Gunzburger, M. Bridging methods for atomistic-to-continuum coupling and their implementation. Commun Computat Phys 2010; 7: 831-876. · Zbl 1364.74020
[34] Silling, S, Lehoucq, R. Convergence of peridynamic to classical elasticity theory. J Elast 2008; 93: 13-37. · Zbl 1159.74316
[35] Bobaru, F, Ha, YD. Adaptive refinement and multiscale modeling in 2D peridynamics. J Multiscale Computat Eng 2011; 9: 635-659.
[36] Tian, X, Du, Q. Trace theorems for some nonlocal function spaces with heterogeneous localization. SIAM J Math Anal 2017; 49: 1621-1644. · Zbl 1373.46030
[37] Seleson, P, Parks, ML. On the role of the influence function in the peridynamic theory. Int J Multiscale Computat Eng 2011; 9: 689-706.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.