The relationship between breaking the Diffie-Hellman protocol and computing discrete logarithms. (English) Zbl 1053.94014

Summary: Both uniform and nonuniform results concerning the security of the Diffie-Hellman key-exchange protocol are proved. First, it is shown that in a cyclic group \(G\) of order \(| G| =\prod{p_i^{e_i}}\), where all the multiple prime factors of \(| G|\) are polynomial in \(\log| G|\), there exists an algorithm that reduces the computation of discrete logarithms in \(G\) to breaking the Diffie-Hellman protocol in \(G\) and has complexity \(\sqrt{\max\{\nu(p_i)\}}\cdot(\log| G|)^{O(1)}\), where \(\nu(p)\) stands for the minimum of the set of largest prime factors of all the numbers d in the interval \([p-2\sqrt{p}+1,p+2\sqrt{p}+1]\). Under the unproven but plausible assumption that \(\nu(p)\) is polynomial in log p, this reduction implies that the Diffie-Hellman problem and the discrete logarithm problem are polynomial-time equivalent in \(G\). Second, it is proved that the Diffie-Hellman problem and the discrete logarithm problem are equivalent in a uniform sense for groups whose orders belong to certain classes: there exists a polynomial-time reduction algorithm that works for all those groups. Moreover, it is shown that breaking the Diffie-Hellman protocol for a small but nonnegligible fraction of the instances is equally difficult as breaking it for all instances. Finally, efficient constructions of groups are described for which the algorithm reducing the discrete logarithm problem to the Diffie-Hellman problem is efficiently constructible.


94A60 Cryptography
11Y16 Number-theoretic algorithms; complexity
11T71 Algebraic coding theory; cryptography (number-theoretic aspects)
68Q15 Complexity classes (hierarchies, relations among complexity classes, etc.)
Full Text: DOI