Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. (English) Zbl 1157.90457

Phillips, Lawrence D.; Bana e Costa, Carlos A.

Ann. Oper. Res. 154, 51-68 (2007).

Summary: Managers in both for-profit and not-for-profit organisations continually face the task of allocating resources by balancing costs, benefits and risks and gaining commitment by a wide constituency of stakeholders to those decisions. This task is complex and difficult because many options are present, benefits and risks are rarely expressed as single objectives, multiple stakeholders with different agendas compete for limited resources, individually optimal resource allocations to organisational units are rarely collectively optimal, and those dissatisfied with the decisions taken may resist implementation. We first explain three current approaches to resource allocation taken from corporate finance, operational research and decision analysis, and we identify a common mistake organisations make in allocating resources. The paper then presents a technical process, multi-criteria portfolio analysis, for balancing the conflicting elements of the problem, and a social process, decision conferencing, which engages all the key players during the modelling process, ensuring their ownership of the model and the subsequent implementation. This socio-technical process improves communication within the organisation, develops shared understanding of the portfolio and generates a sense of common purpose about those projects that will best realise the organisation’s objectives. The paper concludes with lessons we have learned from actual practice.

MSC:

90B50	Management decision making, including multiple objectives
91B32	Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.)

Keywords:

managerial decision making; multi-criteria decision analysis; resource allocation; prioritisation; budgeting; commons dilemma; equity; real-world applications; system design; procurement; capital planning; capital budgeting

References:

[1]	Bana e Costa, C. A. (2001). The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, 111–25 · Zbl 0979.90068
[2]	Bana e Costa, C. A., Costa-Lobo, M. L., Ramos, I. A. J., Vansnick, J.-C. (2002). Multicriteria approach for strategic town planning: the case of Barcelos. In D. Bouyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagreze, P. Perny, R. Slowinsky, D. Vanderpooten, & P. Vincke (Eds.), Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honour of Bernard Roy (pp. 429–456). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. · Zbl 1177.90204
[3]	Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Marcus, A. J. (1995). Fundamentals of corporate finance. New York: McGraw–Hill.
[4]	Brown, G. G., Dell, R. F., & Newman, A. M. (2004). Optimizing military capital planning. Informs, 34(6), 415–425.
[5]	Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions; an introduction to decision analysis. Belmont: Duxbury.
[6]	Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Built to last: successful habits of visionary companies. London: Century Limited.
[7]	Delbecq, A., Van de Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. (1974). Group techniques for program planning. Glenview: Scott Foresman.
[8]	Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
[9]	Keeney, R. L. (1987). An analysis of the portfolio of sites to characterize for selecting a nuclear repository. Risk Analysis, 7(2), 195–218.
[10]	Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[11]	Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley. · Zbl 0488.90001
[12]	Keisler, J. M. (2005). The value of assessing weights in multi-attribute portfolio decision analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, in press.
[13]	MacFarlane, F. (1997). New survey highlights issues in portfolio management. CMR International News, 15, 8–10.
[14]	Phillips, L. D. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56, 29–48.
[15]	Phillips, L. D. (1990). Requisite decision modelling for technological projects. In C. Vlek & G. Cvetkovich (Eds.), Social decision methodology for technological projects (pp. 95–110). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
[16]	Phillips, L. D. (1992). Gaining corporate commitment to change. In C. Holtham (Ed.), Executive information systems and decision support (pp. 79–96). London: Chapman & Hall.
[17]	Quaddus, M. A., Atkinson, D. J., & Levy, M. (1992). An application of decision conferencing to strategic planning for a voluntary organization. Interfaces, 22(6), 61–71.
[18]	Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis. Reading: Addison–Wesley. · Zbl 0181.21802
[19]	Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: building the helping relationship. Reading: Addison–Wesley.
[20]	Sharpe, P., & Keelin, T. (1998). How SmithKline Beecham makes better resource-allocation decisions. Harvard Business Review, 76(2), 45–57.
[21]	Treasury, H. M. (2003). The green book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: The Stationery Office.