×

Effectiveness analysis of deriving priority vectors from reciprocal pairwise comparison matrices. (English) Zbl 1163.90535

Summary: Pairwise comparison is commonly used to estimate the priority values of finite alternatives with respect to a given criterion. We evaluate seven specially selected direct methods of estimating priority vectors from reciprocal pairwise comparison matrices under four effectiveness measures. A simulation experiment is designed starting with true priority vectors that represent difficult cases of “no obvious best alternative” and “two equal best alternatives”. The simulation results suggest that the geometric mean method is in general the best method with the normalized column mean method as a close second best.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600474 · Zbl 0895.90004 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600474
[2] DOI: 10.1007/s00186-006-0077-1 · Zbl 1132.90007 · doi:10.1007/s00186-006-0077-1
[3] Basat I., Journal of Mathematical Psychology 35 pp 80–
[4] DOI: 10.1007/BF00940197 · Zbl 0597.90049 · doi:10.1007/BF00940197
[5] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1995.88 · Zbl 0830.90001 · doi:10.1057/jors.1995.88
[6] DOI: 10.1177/014662168601000106 · doi:10.1177/014662168601000106
[7] DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199612)5:4<312::AID-MCDA130>3.0.CO;2-L · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199612)5:4<312::AID-MCDA130>3.0.CO;2-L
[8] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00250-0 · Zbl 0955.90042 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00250-0
[9] DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(92)90031-2 · Zbl 0763.62041 · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(92)90031-2
[10] DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2004.02.010 · Zbl 1116.90363 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.02.010
[11] DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00042-X · Zbl 1043.62063 · doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00042-X
[12] DOI: 10.1007/BF00933438 · Zbl 0377.94002 · doi:10.1007/BF00933438
[13] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(88)90198-1 · Zbl 0652.90002 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(88)90198-1
[14] DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90045-5 · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(86)90045-5
[15] DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1994.1034 · Zbl 0816.90008 · doi:10.1006/jmps.1994.1034
[16] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90165-J · Zbl 0800.90007 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90165-J
[17] DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3 · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3
[18] DOI: 10.1016/0020-0190(95)00185-9 · Zbl 1004.68550 · doi:10.1016/0020-0190(95)00185-9
[19] DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(84)90003-8 · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(84)90003-8
[20] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601745 · Zbl 1060.90069 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601745
[21] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(87)90273-6 · Zbl 0632.90034 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(87)90273-6
[22] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602129 · Zbl 1123.90045 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602129
[23] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.022 · Zbl 1110.90052 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.022
[24] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00129-8 · Zbl 0947.90598 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00129-8
[25] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899 · Zbl 1055.90560 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899
[26] DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01623.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01623.x
[27] DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 · Zbl 0372.62084 · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
[28] Saaty T. L., The analytic hierarchy process (1980) · Zbl 0587.90002
[29] DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(84)90008-3 · Zbl 0584.62102 · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(84)90008-3
[30] Williams C., Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29 pp 387–
[31] DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90046-7 · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(86)90046-7
[32] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1 · Zbl 0943.90054 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.