×

Finite strain, finite rotation quadratic tetrahedral element for the combined finite-discrete element method. (English) Zbl 1171.74453

Summary: In the past, the combined finite-discrete element was mostly based on linear tetrahedral finite elements. Locking problems associated with this element can seriously degrade the accuracy of their simulations. In this work an efficient ten-noded quadratic element is developed in a format suitable for the combined finite-discrete element method (FEMDEM). The so-called F-bar approach is used to relax volumetric locking and an explicit finite element analysis is employed. A thorough validation of the numerical method is presented including five static and four dynamic examples with different loading, boundary conditions, and materials. The advantages of the new higher-order tetrahedral element are illustrated when brought together with contact detection and contact interaction capability within a new fully 3D FEMDEM formulation. An application comparing stresses generated within two drop experiments involving different unit specimens called Vcross and VRcross is shown. The Vcross and VRcross units of \(3.5 \times 10^{4}\) kg show very different stress generation implying different survivability upon collision with a deformable floor. The test case shows the FEMDEM method has the capability to tackle the dynamics of complex-shaped geometries and massive multi-body granular systems typical of concrete armour and rock armour layers.

MSC:

74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74S30 Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010)
74B20 Nonlinear elasticity
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Thornton, Applications of DEM to process engineering problems, Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales) 9 (2) pp 289– (1992)
[2] Thornton, 3D DEM Simulations of Gas-Solid Fluidised Beds (2002)
[3] Williams, Linear complexity intersection algorithm for discrete element simulation of arbitrary geometries, Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales) 2 (2) pp 185– (1995)
[4] Williams, A contact algorithm for partitioning N arbitrary sized objects, Engineering Computations 21 (2) pp 235– (2004) · Zbl 1062.74671
[5] Feng, Discrete Element Simulation of the Dynamics of High Energy Planetary Ball Milling Processes (2004)
[6] Cleary, Comparison of DEM and experiment for a scale model SAG mill, International Journal of Mineral Processing 8 (1-4) pp 129– (2003)
[7] Mustoe, Material flow analyses of noncircular-shaped granular media using discrete element methods, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 127 (10) pp 1017– (2001)
[8] Xiang, Numerical simulation of particle motion in dense phase pneumatic conveying, Granular Matter 6 (2-3) pp 167– (2004) · Zbl 1202.74038
[9] Cundall, A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies, Geotechnique 29 (1) pp 47– (1979)
[10] Owen, Discrete/Finite Element Modelling of Industrial Applications with Multi-Fracturing and Particulate Phenomena (2002)
[11] Munjiza, Combined finite-discrete element method in transient dynamics of fracturing solids, Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales) 12 (2) pp 145– (1995) · Zbl 0822.73070
[12] Munjiza, The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method (2004) · Zbl 1194.74452
[13] Williams, Superquadrics and modal dynamics for discrete elements in interactive design, Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales) 9 (2) pp 115– (1992)
[14] Latham, Rock fragmentation by blasting-a literature study of research in the 1980’s and 1990’s, FRAGBLAST-International Journal for Blasting and Fragmentation 3 (3) pp 193– (1999)
[15] Munjiza, NBS contact detection algorithm for bodies of similar size, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 43 (1) pp 131– (1998) · Zbl 0937.74079
[16] Munjiza, Penalty function method for combined finite-discrete element systems comprising large number of separate bodies, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 49 (11) pp 1377– (2000) · Zbl 1010.74067
[17] Zienkiewicz, Patch test for mixed formulations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 23 (10) pp 1873– (1986) · Zbl 0614.65115
[18] Zienkiewicz, The Finite Element Method (2000) · Zbl 0962.76056
[19] Malkus, Mixed finite element methods-reduced and selective integration techniques-a unification of concepts, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 15 pp 63– (1978) · Zbl 0381.73075
[20] Zienkiewicz, Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 3 (2) pp 275– (1971) · Zbl 0253.73048
[21] Hughes TJ, Taylor RL, Sackman JL. Finite Element Formulation and Solution of Contact/Impact Problems in Continuum Mechanics. III, U.S.A., 1975; 57.
[22] Moran, Formulation of implicit finite element methods for multiplicative finite deformation plasticity, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 29 (3) pp 483– (1990) · Zbl 0724.73221
[23] de Souza Neto, Design of simple low order finite elements for large strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids, International Journal of Solids and Structures 33 (20-22) pp 3277– (1996) · Zbl 0929.74102
[24] de Souza Neto, F-bar-based linear triangles and tetrahedra for finite strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids. Part I: formulation and benchmarking, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 62 (3) pp 353– (2005) · Zbl 1179.74159
[25] Bonet, An averaged nodal deformation gradient linear tetrahedral element for large strain explicit dynamic applications, Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 17 (8) pp 551– (2001) · Zbl 1154.74307
[26] Tabiei, A nonlinear higher order shear deformation shell element for dynamic explicit analysis: Part I. Formulation and finite element equations, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 36 (1) pp 17– (2000) · Zbl 1064.74673
[27] Bonet, Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis (1997) · Zbl 0891.73001
[28] Latham, The modelling of particle systems with real shapes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series A (Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences) 362 (1822) pp 1953– (2004)
[29] Muttray, Placement and Structural Strength of Xbloc@ and Other Single Layer Armour Units (2006)
[30] Turk, Dynamic structural response of CORE-LOC®, The REMR Bulletin, US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station 14 (3) pp 1– (1997)
[31] Burcharth, Structural Integrity and Hydraulic Stability of Dolos Armour Layers (1993)
[32] Franco, Concrete strength and durability of prototype tetrapods and dolosse: results of field and laboratory tests, Coastal Engineering 40 (3) pp 207– (2000)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.