Are targets for renewable portfolio standards too low? The impact of market structure on energy policy. (English) Zbl 1346.91185

Summary: In order to limit climate change from greenhouse gas emissions, governments have introduced renewable portfolio standards (RPS) to incentivise renewable energy production. While the response of industry to exogenous RPS targets has been addressed in the literature, setting RPS targets from a policymaker’s perspective has remained an open question. Using a bi-level model, we prove that the optimal RPS target for a perfectly competitive electricity industry is higher than that for a benchmark centrally planned one. Allowing for market power by the non-renewable energy sector within a deregulated industry lowers the RPS target vis-à-vis perfect competition. Moreover, to our surprise, social welfare under perfect competition with RPS is lower than that when the non-renewable energy sector exercises market power. In effect, by subsidising renewable energy and taxing the non-renewable sector, RPS represents an economic distortion that over-compensates damage from emissions. Thus, perfect competition with RPS results in “too much” renewable energy output, whereas the market power of the non-renewable energy sector mitigates this distortion, albeit at the cost of lower consumer surplus and higher emissions. Hence, ignoring the interaction between RPS requirements and the market structure could lead to sub-optimal RPS targets and substantial welfare losses.


91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)
91G10 Portfolio theory
Full Text: DOI Link


[1] Adelaja, S. J.; Hailu, Y. G., Effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards and Other State Policies on Wind Industry Development in the U.S. Mimeo (2008), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
[2] Allaz, B.; Vila, J.-L., Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency, Journal of Economic Theory, 59, 1-16 (1993) · Zbl 0802.90031
[3] Amundsen, E. S.; Bergman, L., Green certificates and market power on the Nordic power market, The Energy Journal, 33, 2, 101-117 (2012)
[4] Amundsen, E. S.; Mortensen, J. B., The Danish green certificate system: some simple analytical results, Energy Economics, 23, 489-509 (2001)
[5] Baringo, L.; Conejo, A. J., Transmission and wind power investment, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27, 2, 885-893 (2013)
[6] Bird, L. A.; Lokey, E., Interaction of compliance and voluntary renewable energy market, Technical Report nrel/tp-670-42096 (2007), National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO
[7] Boomsma, T. K.; Meade, N.; Fleten, S.-E., Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: a real options approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 220, 1, 225-237 (2012) · Zbl 1253.91134
[8] Chen, Y.; Liu, A. L.; Hobbs, B. F., Economic and emissions implications of load-based, source-based, and first-seller emissions trading programs under California AB32, Operations Research, 59, 3, 696-712 (2011) · Zbl 1238.91107
[9] Chen, Y.; Wang, L., Renewable portfolio standards in the presence of green consumers and emissions trading, Networks and Spatial Econ., 13, 149-181 (2013) · Zbl 1332.91084
[11] Energy and Environmental Economics, Investigating a Higher Renewables Portfolio Standard in California (2014), San Francisco, CA
[12] Fischer, C., Renewable portfolio standards: when do they lower energy prices?, The Energy Journal, 31, 1, 101-120 (2010)
[13] Gabriel, S. A.; Conejo, A. J.; Fuller, J. D.; Hobbs, B. F.; Ruiz, C., Complementarity modeling in energy markets (2012), Springer: Springer Germany
[14] Hibiki, A.; Kurakawa, Y., Which is a better second best policy, the feed-in tariff scheme or the renewable portfolio standard scheme?, Rieti discussion paper series 13-j-070, research institute of economy, trade & industry, Tokyo, Japan (in japanese) (2013)
[15] Holt, E.; Wiser, R., The treatment of renewable energy certificates, emissions allowances, and green power programs in state renewable portfolio standards, Technical Report lbnl-62574 (2007), Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
[16] Kneifel, J. D., Essays in renewable energy and emissions trading (2008), Department of Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, Ph.d. dissertation
[17] Maurovich-Horvat, L.; Boomsma, T. K.; Siddiqui, A. S., Transmission and wind investment in a deregulated electricity industry, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30, 3, 1633-1643 (2015)
[18] Menz, F. C.; Vachon, S., The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: experience from the states, Energy Policy, 34, 1786-1796 (2006)
[19] Murphy, F.; Rosenthal, E., Allocating the added value of energy policies, The Energy Journal, 27, 2, 143-156 (2006)
[20] Murphy, F.; Smeers, Y., On the impact of forward markets on investments in oligopolistic markets with reference to electricity, Operations Research, 58, 3, 515-528 (2010) · Zbl 1232.91258
[21] Nasiri, F.; Zaccour, G., Renewable portfolio standard policy: a game-theoretic analysis, INFOR, 48, 4, 251-260 (2010) · Zbl 07683582
[22] Sauma, E. E.; Oren, S. S., Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 30, 261-290 (2006)
[23] Tanaka, M.; Chen, Y., Market power in renewable portfolio standards, Energy Economics, 39, 187-196 (2013)
[24] Wiser, R.; Barbose, G., Renewables portfolio standards in the United States: A status report with data through 2007, Technical Report (2008), Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
[25] Yin, H.; Powers, N., Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation?, Energy Policy, 38, 2, 1140-1149 (2010)
[26] Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; McCalley, J. D., Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generation expansion planning, Applied Energy, 88, 2201-2209 (2011)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.