×

How stationarity contradicts intergenerational equity. (English) Zbl 1479.91116

Summary: We show how the condition of stationarity may contradict intergenerational equity. By formalizing the intuition that less sensitivity remains for the continuation of the stream if sensitivity for the interests of the present is combined with stationarity, we point out conflicts (a) between stationarity and the requirement of not letting the present be dictatorial, and (b) between stationarity and equal treatment of generations. We use the results to interpret the non-stationarity of the Chichilnisky and Rank-discounted utilitarian social welfare functions. Non-stationarity combined with time invariance leads to time inconsistency. We illustrate how such non-stationary social welfare functions can be applied in the Ramsey model if time invariance is imposed.

MSC:

91B15 Welfare economics
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Alcantud, JCR, Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto, J. Econ. Theory, 147, 353-363 (2012) · Zbl 1258.91054
[2] Asheim, GB, Individual and collective time-consistency, Rev. Econ. Stud., 64, 427-443 (1997) · Zbl 0891.90001
[3] Asheim, GB; Ekeland, I., Resource conservation across generations in a Ramsey-Chichilnisky model, Econ. Theory, 61, 611-639 (2016) · Zbl 1367.91123
[4] Asheim, GB; Mitra, T., Sustainability and discounted utilitarianism in models of economic growth, Math. Soc. Sci., 59, 148-169 (2010) · Zbl 1202.91194
[5] Banerjee, K.; Mitra, T., On Wold’s approach to representation of preferences, J. Math. Econ., 79, 65-74 (2018) · Zbl 1418.91190
[6] Basu, K.; Mitra, T., Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: the impossibility of being Paretian, Econometrica, 71, 1557-1563 (2003) · Zbl 1153.91648
[7] Basu, K.; Mitra, T., Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: A new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization, J. Econ. Theory, 133, 350-373 (2007) · Zbl 1280.91062
[8] Beals, R.; Koopmans, TC, Maximizing stationary utility in a constant technology, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 17, 1001-1015 (1969) · Zbl 0186.24804
[9] Blackorby, C.; Nissen, D.; Primont, D.; Russell, RR, Consistent intertemporal decision making, Rev. Econ. Stud., 40, 239-248 (1973) · Zbl 0259.90002
[10] Bossert, W.; Sprumont, Y.; Suzumura, K., Ordering infinite utility streams, J. Econ. Theory, 135, 579-589 (2007) · Zbl 1186.91086
[11] Chambers, C., Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf, Soc. Choice Welfare, 32, 243-252 (2009) · Zbl 1167.91344
[12] Chichilnisky, G., An axiomatic approach to sustainable development, Soc. Choice Welfare, 13, 231-257 (1996) · Zbl 0846.90005
[13] Crespo, JA; Nuñez, C.; Rincón-Zapatero, JP, On the impossibility of representing infinite utility streams, Econ. Theory, 40, 47-56 (2009) · Zbl 1159.91010
[14] Diamond, P., The evaluation of infinite utility streams, Econometrica, 33, 170-177 (1965) · Zbl 0127.36602
[15] Dockner, E.; Wagener, F., Markov perfect Nash equilibria in models with a single capital stock, Econ. Theory, 56, 585-625 (2014) · Zbl 1304.91036
[16] Dutta, B.; Basu, K.; Kanbur, R., Some remarks on the ranking of infinite utility streams, Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, Volume I: Ethics, Welfare and Measurement, 136-147 (2008), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford
[17] Fleurbaey, M.; Michel, P., Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion, J. Math. Econ., 39, 777-802 (2003) · Zbl 1046.91104
[18] Halevy, Y., Time consistency: stationarity and time invariance, Econometrica, 83, 335-352 (2015) · Zbl 1419.91190
[19] Jackson, M.O., Yariv, P.: Collective dynamic choice: The necessity of time inconsistency. AEJ: Microecon 7, 150-178 (2015)
[20] Jonsson, A.; Voorneveld, M., The limit of discounted utilitarianism (2015), Mimeo: Luleå University of Technology and Stockholm School of Economics, Mimeo · Zbl 1396.91147
[21] Jonsson, A.; Voorneveld, M., The limit of discounted utilitarianism, Theor. Econ., 13, 19-37 (2018) · Zbl 1396.91147
[22] Koopmans, TC, Stationary ordinal utility and impatience, Econometrica, 28, 287-309 (1960) · Zbl 0149.38401
[23] Lauwers, L., Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set, J. Math. Econ., 46, 32-37 (2010) · Zbl 1197.91085
[24] Millner, A.; Heal, G., Time consistency and time invariance in collective intertemporal choice, J. Econ. Theory, 176, 158-169 (2018) · Zbl 1419.91273
[25] Mitra, T.; Ozbek, MK, On representation of monotone preference orders in a sequence space, Soc. Choice Welfare, 41, 473-487 (2013) · Zbl 1288.91051
[26] Mitra, T.; Sorger, G., Extinction in common property resource models: an analytically tractable example, Econ. Theory, 57, 41-57 (2014) · Zbl 1297.91123
[27] Pollak, RA, Consistent planning, Rev. Econ. Stud., 35, 201-208 (1968)
[28] Ramsey, F., A mathematical theory of saving, Econ. J., 38, 543-59 (1928)
[29] Sakai, T., Limit representations of intergenerational equity, Soc. Choice Welfare, 47, 481-500 (2016) · Zbl 1392.91086
[30] Sorger, G., Markov-perfect Nash equilibria in a class of resource games, Econ. Theory, 11, 79-100 (1998) · Zbl 0891.90190
[31] Zame, WR, Can intergenerational equity be operationalized?, Theor. Econ., 2, 187-202 (2007)
[32] Zuber, S.; Asheim, GB, Justifying social discounting: the rank-discounted utilitarian approach, J. Econ. Theory, 147, 1572-1601 (2012) · Zbl 1245.91028
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.