Shi, Xueni; Da, Gaofeng The reliability of wireless sensor networks with random dependence: modelling and calculation. (Chinese. English summary) Zbl 07809953 Chin. J. Appl. Probab. Stat. 39, No. 5, 747-764 (2023). Summary: The probabilistic combination method is a very useful method to analyze the reliability of wireless sensor network (WSN), and it can effectively deal with the isolation effect and competition failure in the network. However, there are some shortcomings in the reliability modeling and calculation of WSN based on the probabilistic combination method in the existing literature, which leads to a limited application of the research results and even an incorrect evaluation for the reliability of WSN. This paper studies the reliability modeling and calculation of a typical WSN which has only one relay node and the probabilistic functional dependence mechanism. Under the general assumption that WSN faces local failures of components and global failures caused by external attacks, a reliability model that is more realistic and more rigorous is established for WSN. Based on rigorous probability combination analysis, it shows systematic method and compact formulas for the reliability of WSN. The current study enhances the research on such issues in the literature efficiently. Finally, as applications, we calculate the reliability of two special WSNs – body sensor network and air monitoring system. MSC: 90B25 Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research Keywords:propagated failure; random dependence; competing failure; isolation effect; system reliability × Cite Format Result Cite Review PDF Full Text: DOI References: [1] BHUVANESWARI V, PORKODI R. The Internet of Things (IoT) applications and communication enabling technology standards: an overview [C] // IEEE. 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Computing Applications. New York: IEEE, 2014: 324-329. [2] XING L D. Cascading failures in Internet of Things: review and perspectives on reliability and resilience [J]. IEEE Internet Things J, 2021, 8(1): 44-64. [3] KOCAKULAK M, BUTUN I. An overview of wireless sensor networks towards Internet of Things [C] // CHAKRABARTI S, SAHA H N. (eds) 2017 IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Commu-nication Workshop and Conference (CCWC). New York: IEEE, 2017: 6 pages. [4] MISHRA S, THAKKAR H. Features of WSN and data aggregation techniques in WSN: a survey [J]. IJEIT, 2012, 1(4): 264-273. [5] ALSHAHEEN H, TAKRURI-RIZK H. Energy saving and reliability for wireless body sensor networks (WBSN) [J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 16678-16695. [6] KIM D Y, JIN Z L, CHOI J W, et al. Transmission power control with the guaranteed communication reliability in WSN [J]. Int J Distrib Sens Netw, 2015, 2015: 632590 (12 pages). [7] WANG Y J, XING L D, WANG H G, et al. Combinatorial analysis of body sensor networks subject to probabilistic competing failures [J]. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2015, 142: 388-398. [8] ZHOU W, JIA Y, PENG A, et al. The effect of IoT new features on security and privacy: new threats, existing solutions, and challenges yet to be solved[J]. IEEE Internet Things J, 2019, 6(2): 1606-1616. [9] ABDUL-GHANI H A, KONSTANTAS D, MAHYOUB M. A comprehensive IoT attacks survey based on a building-blocked reference model [J]. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl, 2018, 9(3): 355-373. [10] SUN Y Q, WANG X D, ZHOU X M. Jamming attacks in wireless network [J]. J Softw, 2012, 23(5): 1207-1221. (in Chinese) [11] XING L D, LEVITIN G. Combinatorial analysis of systems with competing failures subject to failure isolation and propagation effects [J]. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2010, 95(11): 1210-1215. [12] XING L D, LEVITIN G, WANG C N, et al. Reliability of systems subject to failures with dependent propagation effect [J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern -Syst, 2013, 43(2): 277-290. [13] ZHAO G L, XING L D. Reliability analysis of body sensor networks subject to random isolation time [J]. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2021, 207: 107345 (12 pages). [14] XING L D. Reliability in Internet of Things: current status and future perspectives [J]. IEEE Internet Things J, 2020, 7(8): 6704-6721. [15] BARLOW R E, PROSCHAN F. Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Probability Mod-els [M]. Reprint with corrections. Silver Spring, MD: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1981. [16] ROSE K, ELDRIDGE S, CHAPIN L. The Internet of Things: an overview [OL]. 2015 [2015-10]. https://www.fsantos.utad.pt/bibliografia/20ISOC-IoT-Overview X.pdf. [17] YIN Y H, ZENG Y, CHEN X, et al. The Internet of Things in healthcare: an overview [J]. J Ind Inf Integr, 2016, 1: 3-13. [18] JONES V, SHASHAR N, SHAPHRUT O B, et al. Remote monitoring for healthcare and for safety in extreme environments [M] // ISTEPANIAN R S H, LAXMINARAYAN S, PATTICHIS C S. (eds) [19] M-Health: Emerging Mobile Health Systems. New York: Springer, 2006: 561-573. [20] WANG Y J, XING L D, MANDAVA L. Probabilistic competing failure analysis in multi-state wire-less sensor networks [C] // IEEE. 2018 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). Rolling Meadows, IL: IEST-Inst Environmental Science & Technology, 2018: 7 pages. This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.