×

Stepwise investment and capacity sizing under uncertainty. (English) Zbl 1368.90084

Summary: The relationship between uncertainty and managerial flexibility is particularly crucial in addressing capital projects. We consider a firm that can invest in a project in either a single (lumpy investment) or multiple stages (stepwise investment) under price uncertainty and has discretion over not only the time of investment but also the size of the project. We confirm that if the capacity of a project is fixed and the investment premium associated with stepwise investment is positive, then lumpy investment becomes more valuable than a stepwise investment strategy under high price uncertainty. By contrast, if a firm has discretion over capacity, then we show that the stepwise investment strategy always dominates that of lumpy investment. In addition, we show that the total amount of installed capacity under a stepwise investment strategy is always greater than that under lumpy investment.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI Link

References:

[1] Abel AB, Eberly JC (1996) Optimal investment with costly reversibility. Rev Econ Stud 63(4):581-593 · Zbl 0864.90011 · doi:10.2307/2297794
[2] Adkins R, Paxson D (2015) Stepwise Investment Value under Stage Specific Parameters, working paper. Bradford University School of Management, Bradford
[3] Alvarez L, Stenbacka R (2004) Optimal risk adoption: a real options approach. Econ Theory 23:123-147 · Zbl 1175.91082 · doi:10.1007/s00199-002-0349-9
[4] Anand KS, Girotra K (2007) The strategic perils of delayed differentiation. Manag Sci 53(5):697-712 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0655
[5] Arrow K, Fisher AC (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility quarterly. J Econ 88:312-319
[6] Baldursson F, Karatzas I (1997) Irreversible investment and industry equilibrium. Financ Stoch 1:69-89 · Zbl 0883.90009 · doi:10.1007/s007800050017
[7] Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge
[8] Bøckman T, Fleten SE, Juliussen E, Langhammer HJ, Revdal I (2008) Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects. Eur J Oper Res 109(1):255-267 · Zbl 1147.91024 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.044
[9] Boomsma TK, Meade N, Fleten SE (2012) Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: a real options approach. Eur J Oper Res 220(1):225-237 · Zbl 1253.91134 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.017
[10] Chod J, Rudi N (2005) Resource flexibility with responsive pricing. Oper Res 53(3):532-548 · Zbl 1165.90433 · doi:10.1287/opre.1040.0191
[11] Chronopoulos M, De Reyck B, Siddiqui AS (2012) The value of capacity sizing under risk aversion and operational flexibility. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 60(2):272-288 · doi:10.1109/TEM.2012.2211363
[12] Dangl T (1999) Investment and capacity choice under uncertain demand. Eur J Oper Res 117:415-428 · Zbl 0939.91060 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00274-4
[13] Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
[14] Doege J, Schiltknecht P, Lüthi HJ (2006) Risk management of power portfolios and valuation of flexibility. OR Spectrum 28(2):267-287 · Zbl 1122.91039 · doi:10.1007/s00291-005-0005-4
[15] Gahungu J, Smeers Y (2012) A real options model for electricity capacity expansion. Université Catholique de Louvain, CORE, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve
[16] Gamba A, Fusari N (2009) Valuing modularity as a real option. Manag Sci 55(11):1877-1896 · Zbl 1232.91705 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1070
[17] Gollier C, Proult D, Thais F, Walgenwitz G (2005) Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: valuing modularity. Energy Econ 27:667-685 · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2005.04.003
[18] Goyal M, Netessine S (2007) Strategic technology choice and capacity investment under demand uncertainty. Manag Sci 53(2):192-207 · Zbl 1232.91363 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0611
[19] Hagspiel V, Huisman KJM, Kort PM (2016) Volume Flexibility and Capacity Investment under Demand Uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 178:95-108 · Zbl 1122.91039
[20] Henry C (1974) Investment decisions under uncertainty: the irreversibility effect. Am Econ Rev 64:89-104
[21] He H, Pindyck RS (1992) Investments in flexible production capacity. J Econ Dyn Control 16:575-599 · Zbl 0825.90096 · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(92)90050-O
[22] Huisman KJM, Kort PM (2015) Strategic capacity investment under uncertainty. RAND J Econ 46(2):376-408 · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12089
[23] Jørgensen S, Kort PM (1993) Optimal dynamic investment policies under concave-convex adjustment costs. J Econ Dyn Control 17:153-180 · Zbl 0775.90065 · doi:10.1016/S0165-1889(06)80008-4
[24] Kort PM, Murto P, Pawlina G (2010) Uncertainty and stepwise investment. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):196-203 · Zbl 1195.91171 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.027
[25] Leahy JV (1993) Investment in competitive equilibrium: the optimality of myopic behavior. Q J Econ 108(4):1105-1133 · doi:10.2307/2118461
[26] Löffler C, Pfeiffer T, Schneider G (2013) The irreversibility effect and agency conflicts. Theory Decis 74:219-239 · Zbl 1282.91087 · doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9331-6
[27] Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev Financ Stud 14(1):113-147 · Zbl 1386.91144 · doi:10.1093/rfs/14.1.113
[28] Lund D (2005) How to analyse the investment-uncertainty relationship in real option models. Rev Financ Econ 14:311-322 · doi:10.1016/j.rfe.2004.10.001
[29] Mackintosh J (2003) Ford learns to bend with the wind. Financial Times, 14 February
[30] Majd S, Pindyck RS (1987) Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. J Financ Econ 18:7-27 · doi:10.1016/0304-405X(87)90059-6
[31] Malchow-Møller N, Thorsen BJ (2005) Repeated real options: optimal investment behavior and a good rule of thumb. J Econ Dyna Control 29:1025-1041 · Zbl 1200.91300 · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2004.08.002
[32] Pawlina G, Kort PM (2003) Strategic capital budgeting: asset replacement under market uncertainty. OR Spectrum 25(4):443-479 · Zbl 1031.91062 · doi:10.1007/s00291-003-0137-3
[33] Pindyck RS (1988) Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm. Am Econ Rev 79:969-985
[34] Rodrigues A, Armada MJ (2007) The valuation of modular projects: a real options approach to the value of splitting. Global Financ J 18:205-227 · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2006.10.002
[35] Siddiqui AS, Maribu KM (2009) Investment and upgrade in distributed generation under uncertainty. Energy Econ 31(1):25-37 · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2008.08.007
[36] Siddiqui AS, Takashima R (2012) Capacity switching options under rivalry and uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 222(3):583-595 · Zbl 1253.91037 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.034
[37] Takashima R, Siddiqui AS, Nakada S (2012) Investment timing, capacity sizing, and technology choice of power plants. Handbook of networks in power systems I energy systems, pp 303-321 · Zbl 0939.91060
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.