×

The challenges and scope of theoretical biology. (English) Zbl 1405.92006

Summary: Scientific theories seek to provide simple explanations for significant empirical regularities based on fundamental physical and mechanistic constraints. Biological theories have rarely reached a level of generality and predictive power comparable to physical theories. This discrepancy is explained through a combination of frozen accidents, environmental heterogeneity, and widespread nonlinearities observed in adaptive processes. At the same time, model building has proven to be very successful when it comes to explaining and predicting the behavior of particular biological systems. In this respect biology resembles alternative model-rich frameworks, such as economics and engineering. In this paper we explore the prospects for general theories in biology, and suggest that these take inspiration not only from physics, but also from the information sciences. Future theoretical biology is likely to represent a hybrid of parsimonious reasoning and algorithmic or rule-based explanation. An open question is whether these new frameworks will remain transparent to human reason. In this context, we discuss the role of machine learning in the early stages of scientific discovery. We argue that evolutionary history is not only a source of uncertainty, but also provides the basis, through conserved traits, for very general explanations for biological regularities, and the prospect of unified theories of life.

MSC:

92B05 General biology and biomathematics
68T05 Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence
92-02 Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to biology

Software:

PRMLT
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abbott, D.; Keverne, E.; Bercovitch, F.; Shively, C.A.; Mendoza, S.P.; Saltzman, W.; Snowdon, C.T.; Ziegler, T.; Banjevic, M.; Garland, T.; Sapolsky, R.M., Are subordinates always stressed? a comparative analysis of rank differences in cortisol levels among primates, Hormones and behavior, 43, 67-82, (2003)
[2] Alon, U., 2007. An introduction to systems biology: design principles of biological circuits. An Introduction to Design Principles of Biological Circuits URI Alon. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor Francis Group Computational, CRC Press.; Alon, U., 2007. An introduction to systems biology: design principles of biological circuits. An Introduction to Design Principles of Biological Circuits URI Alon. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor Francis Group Computational, CRC Press.
[3] Anderson, P., More is different, Science, 177, 393-396, (1972)
[4] Arrow, K., Methodological individualism and social knowledge, The American economic review, 84, 1-9, (1994)
[5] Avise, J.; Ayala, F., In the light of evolution i: adaptation and complex design, Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences USA, 104, 8563-8566, (2007)
[6] Benko, G.; Flamm, C.; Stadler, P.F., A graph-based toy model of chemistry, Journal of chemical information and computer science, 43, 1085-1093, (2003)
[7] Benko, G., Flamm, C., Stadler, P., 2004. Multi-phase artificial chemistry. In: The Logic of Artificial Life: Abstracting and Synthesizing the Principles of Living Systems, vol. 1, pp. 10-20.; Benko, G., Flamm, C., Stadler, P., 2004. Multi-phase artificial chemistry. In: The Logic of Artificial Life: Abstracting and Synthesizing the Principles of Living Systems, vol. 1, pp. 10-20.
[8] Bennett, C., Logical depth and physical complexity. the universal Turing machine A half century survey, The universal Turing machine: A halfcentury survey, (1988), Springer
[9] Bishop, C.M., Pattern recognition and machine learning, (2006), Springer NY · Zbl 1107.68072
[10] Boehm, C.; Flack, J.C., The emergence of simple and complex power structures through social niche construction, ()
[11] Bonabeau, E., Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems, Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences USA, 99, 7280-7287, (2002)
[12] Britten, R.; Davidson, E., Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory, Science, 165, 349-357, (1969)
[13] Bulmer, M., 1994. Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology. Sinauer Associates.; Bulmer, M., 1994. Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology. Sinauer Associates.
[14] Carroll, S.B., Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity, Cell, 101, 577-580, (2000)
[15] Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Special Technical Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, vol. 11.; Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Special Technical Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, vol. 11.
[16] Chomsky, N., On formalization and formal linguistics, Natural language linguistic theory, 8, 143-147, (1990)
[17] Cohen, J., Mathematics is Biology’s next microscope, only better; biology is mathematics’ next physics, only better, Plos biology, 12, e439-e440, (2004)
[18] Cohen, J.E., Mathematics is Biology’s next microscope, only better; biology is mathematics’ next physics, only better, Plos biology, 2, 12, e439, (2004)
[19] Colander, D., The death of neoclassical economics, Journal of the history of economic thought, 22, 127-143, (2000)
[20] Courant, R., Hilbert, D., 1962. Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 11. Interscience; Courant, R., Hilbert, D., 1962. Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 11. Interscience · Zbl 0099.29504
[21] Cowan, J.D., Society, A.M., 1974. Some mathematical questions in biology. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, vols. 6, AMS Bookstore, p. 141.; Cowan, J.D., Society, A.M., 1974. Some mathematical questions in biology. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, vols. 6, AMS Bookstore, p. 141. · Zbl 0294.00012
[22] Crutchfield, J.P.; Shalizi, C.R., Thermodynamic depth of causal states: objective complexity via minimal representations, Physics review E, 59, 275-283, (1999)
[23] Danos, V.; Feret, J.; Fontana, W.; Harmer, R.; Krivine, J., The middle way, Transactions on computational systems biology, 11, 116-137, (2009)
[24] Davidson, E., The regulatory genome: gene regulatory networks in development and evolution, (2006), Associated Press
[25] Davidson, E.; Erwin, D., Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans, Science, 311, 796-800, (2006)
[26] Dayan, P.; Abbott, L., Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems, (2001), The MIT Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 1051.92010
[27] Einstein, A., Infeld, L., Infeld, L., 1966. The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. Simon and Schuster.; Einstein, A., Infeld, L., Infeld, L., 1966. The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. Simon and Schuster. · Zbl 0114.20104
[28] Epstein, J., Agent-based computational models and generative social science, Complexity, 4, 41-60, (1999)
[29] Farmer, J.D.; Geanakoplos, J., The virtues and vices of equilibrium and the future of financial economics, Complexity, 14, 11-38, (2009)
[30] Felsenstein, J., Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability, Annual review of genetics, 22, 521-565, (1988)
[31] Flack, J.C.; deWaal, F., Context modulates signal meaning in primate communication, Proceedings of natational Academy of science, 104, 1581-1586, (2007)
[32] Fontana, W.; Buss, L.W., What would be conserved if ‘the tape were played twice’?, Proceedings of natational Academic science USA, 91, 757-761, (1994)
[33] Frank, S., Foundations of social evolution, (1998), Princeton University Press Princeton
[34] Gillespie, J., The causes of molecular evolution, (1994), Oxford University Press USA
[35] Gillespie, J., Population genetics: A concise guide, (2004), JHU Press
[36] Glimcher, P.W.; Rustichini, A., Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision, Science, 5695, 447-452, (2004)
[37] Hamilton, W., Geometry for the selfish herd, Journal of theoretical biology, 31, 295-311, (1971)
[38] Hamilton, W., 1975. In: Fox, R. (Ed.), Biosocial Anthropology. Malaby Press, London.; Hamilton, W., 1975. In: Fox, R. (Ed.), Biosocial Anthropology. Malaby Press, London.
[39] Hamilton, W.; Ridley, M.; Dawkins, R.; Bunney, S., Narrow roads of gene land: the collected papers of wd Hamilton, (2001), Oxford University Press
[40] Hennig, W., Phylogenetic systematics, Annual review of entomology, 10, 97-116, (1965)
[41] Hillis, D.; Moritz, C.; Mable, B.; Sperling, F., Molecular systematics, Annals of the entomological society of America, 85, 536-537, (1997)
[42] Hood, L., Systems biology: integrating technology, biology, and computation, Mechanisms of ageing and development, 124, 9-16, (2003)
[43] Hopfield, J., Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences USA, 79, 2554-2558, (1982) · Zbl 1369.92007
[44] Jacob, F., Evolution and tinkering, Science, 196, 1161-1166, (1977)
[45] Keller, E., Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors and machines, (2003), Harvard University Press Boston
[46] Kimura, M.; Takahata, N., Population genetics, molecular evolution, and the neutral theory: selected papers, (1994), University of Chicago Press
[47] Kingsland, S.E., Modeling nature: episodes in the history of population ecology, (1995), University of Chicago Press, p. 306
[48] Kirschner, M., The meaning of systems biology, Cell, 121, 503-504, (2005)
[49] Kragh, H.; Brush, S., Quantum generations: a history of physics in the twentieth century, American journal of physics, 69, 524-525, (2001)
[50] Krakauer, D., 2002. From physics to phenomenology. Levels of description and levels of selection. ‘In silico’ simulation of biological processes, Novartis Foundation symposium, vol. 247. John Wiley and Sons.; Krakauer, D., 2002. From physics to phenomenology. Levels of description and levels of selection. ‘In silico’ simulation of biological processes, Novartis Foundation symposium, vol. 247. John Wiley and Sons.
[51] Krakauer, D.C.; Zanotto, A.P., Transitions from non-living to living matter, (2008), MIT Press Boston
[52] Krakauer, D., Zanotto, P. 2006, Viral individuality and limitations of the life concept. In: Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter, vol. 1, pp. 513-536.; Krakauer, D., Zanotto, P. 2006, Viral individuality and limitations of the life concept. In: Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter, vol. 1, pp. 513-536.
[53] Laughlin, R.; Pines, P.; Schmalian, J.; Stojkovic, B.; Wolynes, P., The middle way, Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences USA, 97, 32-37, (2000)
[54] Lehmann, L.; Keller, L.; West, S.; Roze, D., Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process, Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences USA, 104, 6736-6739, (2007)
[55] Lehmann, L.; Keller, L.; West, S.; Roze, D., Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process, Proceedings of national Academy of science USA, 104, 6736-6739, (2007)
[56] Levin, S.A.; Grenfell, B.; Hastings, A.; Perelson, A.S., Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology and ecosystems science, Science, 275, 334-343, (1997) · Zbl 1225.92058
[57] Levins, R., The strategy of model building in population biology, American scientist, 54, 421-431, (1966)
[58] Levins, R.; Lewontin, R.C., The dialectical biologist, (1985), Harvard University Press, p. 303
[59] Machta, J., Complexity, parallel computation and statistical physics, Complexity (New York), 5, 46-64, (2006)
[60] Materna, S.C.; Davidson, E.H., Logic of gene regulatory networks, Current opinion in biotechnology, 18, 351-354, (2007)
[61] May, R., Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, (1973), Princeton University Press Princeton
[62] May, R., Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, (2001), Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ · Zbl 1044.92047
[63] McCullough, W.; Pitts, W., A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous tissue, Bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5, 115-133, (1943) · Zbl 0063.03860
[64] Nagel, E., The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation, (1979), Hacket Publishing Company Cambridge, USA
[65] Nowak, M., Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life, (2006), Harvard University Press Boston · Zbl 1115.92047
[66] Samuelson, P.A., Modes of thought in economics and biology, The American economic review, 75, 166-172, (1985)
[67] Suh, N.P., The principles of design, (1990), Oxford University Press USA
[68] Suzuki, H.; Dittrich, P., Artificial chemistry, Artificial life, 15, 1-3, (2009)
[69] Tesfatsion, L., Introduction to the special issue on agent-based computational economics, Journal of economic dynamics and control, 28, 281-293, (2001) · Zbl 0956.91055
[70] Traulsen, A.; Nowak, M., Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection, Proceedings of national Academy of science USA, 103, 10952-10955, (2006)
[71] West, G.; Brown, J.; Enquist, B., A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology, Science, 276, 122-126, (1997)
[72] Wigner, E., The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences, Communications in pure and applied mathematics, 13, I, (1960), February · Zbl 0102.00703
[73] Witten, I., Frank, E., 2005. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. \( \langle\) books.google.com \(\rangle \); Witten, I., Frank, E., 2005. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. \( \langle\) books.google.com \(\rangle \) · Zbl 1076.68555
[74] Young, L.J.; Hammock, E.A.D., On switches and knobs, microsatellites and monogamy, Trends in genetics, 23, 209-212, (2007)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.