×

Numerical simulation of detonation structures using a thermodynamically consistent and fully conservative reactive flow model for multi-component computations. (English) Zbl 1186.80022

Summary: This paper presents a simplified reactive multi-gas model for the numerical simulation of detonation waves. The mathematical model is formulated based on a thermodynamically consistent and fully conservative formulation, and is extended to model reactive flow by considering the reactant and product gases as two constituents of the system and modelling the conversion between these by a simple one-step reaction mechanism. This simplified model allows simulations using more appropriate chemico-thermodynamic properties of the combustible mixture and yields close Chapman-Jouguet detonation parameters from detailed chemistry. The governing equations are approximated using a high-resolution finite volume centred scheme in an adaptive mesh refinement code, permitting high-resolution simulations to be performed at flow regions of interest. The algorithm is tested and validated by comparing results to predictions of the one-dimensional linear stability analysis of the steady detonation and through the study of the evolution of two-dimensional cellular detonation waves in gaseous hydrogen-based mixtures.

MSC:

80M25 Other numerical methods (thermodynamics) (MSC2010)
80A25 Combustion
76L05 Shock waves and blast waves in fluid mechanics
76N15 Gas dynamics (general theory)
76V05 Reaction effects in flows
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI Link Link

References:

[1] J COMPUT PHYS 125 pp 150– (1996)
[2] SIAM SCI COMPUT 22 pp 1533– (2000)
[3] PHYS FLUIDS 19 pp 036101– (2007)
[4] Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 39 pp 263– (2007) · Zbl 1106.76006
[5] J COMPUT PHYS 82 pp 64– (1989)
[6] SIAM J APPL MATH 51 pp 303– (1991)
[7] COMBUSTION FLAME 90 pp 211– (1992)
[8] COMBUSTION FLAME 113 pp 106– (1998)
[9] PHYS FLUIDS 7 pp 684– (1964)
[10] PHYS FLUIDS 9 pp 903– (1966)
[11] SHOCK WAVES 9 pp 11– (1999)
[12] COMBUSTION FLAME 116 pp 154– (1999)
[13] PROC COMBUSTION INST 31 pp 2397– (2007)
[14] COMBUSTION THEORY MODEL 8 pp 339– (2004)
[15] MATH COMPUT 62 pp 497– (1994) · doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1994-1201068-0
[16] AIAA J 38 pp 1698– (2000)
[17] J COMPUT PHYS 112 pp 31– (1994)
[18] SIAM J SCI COMPUT 17 pp 1019– (1996)
[19] J FLUID MECHANICS 216 pp 103– (1990)
[20] COMBUSTION THEORY MODEL 9 pp 93– (2005)
[21] J FLUID MECHANICS 476 pp 179– (2003)
[22] J LOSS PREV PROCESS INDUST 21 pp 136– (2008)
[23] COMBUSTION THEORY MODEL 9 pp 159– (2005)
[24] COMBUSTION THEORY MODEL 9 pp 385– (2005)
[25] AIAA PROGR ASTRON AERONAUTICS 114 pp 155– (1988)
[26] COMBUSTION FLAME 113 pp 147– (1998)
[27] COMBUSTION FLAME 133 pp 211– (2003)
[28] J FLUID MECHANICS 447 pp 31– (2001) · Zbl 1032.76080 · doi:10.1017/S0022112001005535
[29] PROC R SOC LOND A 455 pp 1203– (1999)
[30] PROC R SOC LOND A 456 pp 2081– (2000)
[31] J FLUID MECHANICS 339 pp 89– (1997)
[32] COMBUSTION THEORY MODEL 7 pp 401– (2003)
[33] J FLUID MECHANICS 595 pp 45– (2008)
[34] PROC R SOC LOND A 458 pp 49– (2002)
[35] AIAA J 16 pp 73– (1978)
[36] Toro, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 20 (1) pp 47– (2000) · Zbl 0943.65100 · doi:10.1093/imanum/20.1.47
[37] PROC COMBUSTION INST 29 pp 2783– (2002)
[38] J COMPUT PHYS 195 pp 528– (2004)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.