×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Sequential all-pay auctions with noisy outputs. (English) Zbl 1284.91192
Summary: We study a sequential all-pay auction with two contestants who are privately informed about a parameter (ability) that affects their cost of effort. Contestant 1 (the first mover) exerts an effort in the first period which translates into an observable output, but with some noise, and contestant 2 (the second mover) observes this noisy output. Then, contestant 2 exerts an effort in the second period, and wins the contest if her output is larger than or equal to the observed noisy output of contestant 1; otherwise, contestant 1 wins. We study two variations of this model: one in which both contestants do not know the realization of the noise when they exert their effort (symmetric information), and another in which contestant 1 knows the realization of the noise when exerting her effort, while contestant 2 does not (asymmetric information). For both variations, we characterize the subgame perfect equilibrium and examine the effect of a random noise on the contestants’ equilibrium outputs. In particular we show that contestants’ equilibrium behavior in our model is robust to the existence of a small noise.
MSC:
91B26 Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Akerlof, R.; Holden, R., The nature of tournaments, Economic Theory, 51, 289-313, (2012) · Zbl 1262.91101
[2] Amman, E.; Leininger, W., Asymmetric all-pay auctions with incomplete information: the two-player case, Games and Economic Behavior, 14, 1-18, (1996) · Zbl 0860.90040
[3] Baye, M.; Kovenock, D.; de Vries, C., The all-pay auction with complete information, Economic Theory, 8, 291-305, (1996) · Zbl 0859.90058
[4] Baye, M.; Kovenock, D.; de Vries, C., Contests with rank-order spillovers, Economic Theory, (2008), (forthcoming) · Zbl 1262.91077
[5] Che, Y. K.; Gale, I., Caps on political lobbying, American Economic Review, 88, 3, 643-651, (1998)
[6] Che, Y. K.; Gale, I., Difference-form contests and the robustness of all-pay auctions, Games and Economic Behavior, 30, 22-43, (2000) · Zbl 0938.91003
[7] Ederer, F., Feedback and motivation in dynamic tournaments, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19, 733-769, (2010)
[8] Gavious, A.; Moldovanu, B.; Sela, A., Bid costs and endogenous bid caps, Rand Journal of Economics, 33, 4, 709-722, (2003)
[9] Hillman, A.; Riley, J., Politically contestable rents and transfers, Economics and Politics, 1, 17-39, (1989)
[10] Krishna, V.; Morgan, J., An analysis of the war of attrition and the all-pay auction, Journal of Economic Theory, 72, 2, 343-362, (1997) · Zbl 0883.90054
[11] Krishna, V.; Morgan, J., The winner-take-all principle in small tournaments, Advances in Applied Microeconomics, 7, 61-74, (1998)
[12] Lazear, E.; Rosen, S., Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864, (1981)
[13] Leininger, W., Patent competition, rent dissipation and the persistence of monopoly, Journal of Economic Theory, 53, 1, 146-172, (1991) · Zbl 0717.90021
[14] Moldovanu, B.; Sela, A., The optimal allocation of prizes in contests, American Economic Review, 91, 3, 542-558, (2001)
[15] Moldovanu, B.; Sela, A., Contest architecture, Journal of Economic Theory, 126, 1, 70-97, (2006) · Zbl 1108.91008
[16] Moldovanu, B.; Sela, A.; Shi, X., Carrots and sticks: prizes and punishments in contests, Economic Inquiry, 50, 2, 453-462, (2012)
[17] Nalebuff, B.; Stiglitz, J., Prizes and incentives: towards a general theory of compensation and competition, Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 21-43, (1983)
[18] Rosen, S., Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments, American Economic Review, 76, 701-715, (1986)
[19] Segev, E., Sela, A., (2011). Sequential all-pay auctions with head starts. Working Paper, Ben-Gurion University. · Zbl 1307.91091
[20] Siegel, R., All-pay contests, Econometrica, 77, 1, 71-92, (2009) · Zbl 1160.91315
[21] Yildirim, H., Contests with multiple rounds, Games and Economic Behavior, 51, 213-227, (2005) · Zbl 1112.91015
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.