Seo, Soogil Circular distributions and Euler systems. II. (English) Zbl 1023.11056 Compos. Math. 137, No. 1, 91-98 (2003). This short article presents complements and variations on the author’s results “Circular distributions and Euler systems” [J. Number Theory 88, 366-379 (2001; Zbl 0995.11060)]. The question is again how far the module \({\mathfrak E}\) of all circular distributions deviates from the Galois span \(R\Phi\) of the canonical cyclotomic distribution \(\Phi\). The naive equality \({\mathfrak E}=R\Phi\) is not true, but Coleman conjectures that \({\mathfrak F}=R\Phi\) where \({\mathfrak F}\) is a submodule of \({\mathfrak E}\) defined by quite natural congruence conditions. The author gives two theorems: (A) If \(p\) is coprime to \(\phi(n)\), then the indices \([{\mathfrak E}(np^r):C(np^r)]\) are all prime to \(p\) and bounded for \(1\leq r\to \infty\), where \(C(m)\) denotes the group of cyclotomic units in \(\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_m)\). (B) If \(p\) is an odd prime and if we restrict our distributions to \(p\)-power roots of unity, then every circular distribution can be made cyclotomic by raising it to a nontrivial natural power. The methods of proof are fairly standard and use the Main Conjecture again. Reviewer: Cornelius Greither (Neubiberg) Cited in 5 Documents MSC: 11R18 Cyclotomic extensions 11R23 Iwasawa theory Keywords:cyclotomic units; Euler systems; class numbers PDF BibTeX XML Cite \textit{S. Seo}, Compos. Math. 137, No. 1, 91--98 (2003; Zbl 1023.11056) Full Text: DOI