×

A note on small composite designs for sequential experimentation. (English) Zbl 05902639

Summary: The recommended approach to experiments using the response surface methodology is sequential, i.e., experiments should be conducted iteratively. At the first stage, a first-order design, usually an orthogonal two-level design (with a few center points) is used to find out whether the current region is appropriate and to allow the estimation of main effects (and possibly some interactions). The design at the first stage is then augmented with more runs in the second stage. The combined design allows the estimation of the remaining interaction and quadratic effects. Some well-known classes of designs which allow such a sequential experimentation are the central composite designs, the small composite designs and the augmented-pair designs. This paper reviews these designs and introduces a new algorithm which is able to augment any first order design with additional design points to form a good design for a second-order model.

MSC:

62-XX Statistics
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Angelopoulos, P.; Evangelaras, H.; Koukouvinos, C., Small, balanced, efficient and near-rotatable central composite designs, J. of Statist. Planning and Inference, 139, 2010-2013 (2009) · Zbl 1159.62052 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.09.001
[2] Box, GEP; Behnken, DW, Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables, Technometrics, 2, 455-477 (1960) · Zbl 0097.34406 · doi:10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912
[3] Box, GEP; Wilson, KB, On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 13, 1-45 (1951) · Zbl 0043.34402
[4] Draper, NR; Lin, DKJ, Small response surface designs, Technometrics, 32, 187-194 (1990) · doi:10.1080/00401706.1990.10484634
[5] Draper, NR; Lin, DKJ; Ghosh, S. (ed.); Rao, CR (ed.), Response Surface Designs, 343-375 (1996) · Zbl 0911.62068
[6] Draper, NR; Pukelsheim, F., Another look at rotatability, Technometrics, 32, 195-202 (1990) · Zbl 0709.62071 · doi:10.1080/00401706.1990.10484635
[7] John, P.M.W., 1971. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. McMillan. · Zbl 0231.62089
[8] Morris, MD, A class of three-level experimental designs for response surface, Technometrics, 42, 111-121 (2000) · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10485990
[9] Myers, R.H., Montgomery D.C., Anderson-Cook C.M., 2009. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed. Wiley. · Zbl 1269.62066
[10] Nguyen, N-K; Borkowski, JJ, New three-level response surface designs constructed from incomplete block designs, J. of Statist. Planning and Inference, 138, 294-305 (2008) · Zbl 1130.62082 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2007.05.002
[11] Park, SH, A class of multifactor designs for estimating the slope of response surfaces, Technometrics, 29, 449-453 (1987) · Zbl 0632.62075 · doi:10.1080/00401706.1987.10488273
[12] Parker, AP; Kowalski, SM; Vining, GG, Classes of split-plot response surface designs for equivalent estimation, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 291-305 (2006) · doi:10.1002/qre.771
[13] Plackett, RL; Burman, JP, The designs of optimum multi-factorial experiments, Biometrika, 33, 305-325 (1946) · Zbl 0063.06274 · doi:10.1093/biomet/33.4.305
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.