Enomoto, Hikoe; Jackson, Bill; Katerinis, P.; Saito, Akira Toughness and the existence of k-factors. (English) Zbl 0598.05054 J. Graph Theory 9, No. 1, 87-95 (1985). Finite undirected connected graphs G without loops and multiple edges are considered. If \(S\subset V(G)\), then by G-S denote the subgraph of G induced by the set V(G)-S and by w(G-S) the number of components of G-S. A graph G is t-tough if the implication \(w(G-S)>1\Rightarrow | S| \geq t.w(G-S)\) holds for any \(S\subset V(G)\). The toughness of a graph was introduced by V. Chvátal who made also the following conjecture [Tough graphs and Hamiltonian circuits, Discrete Math. 5, 215-228 (1973; Zbl 0256.05122)]: If G is k-tough, \(| G| \geq k+1\) and \(k| G|\) is even, then G has a k-factor. The main result of the present paper is the proof of this conjecture (Theorem 1). Further, the result is shown to be sharp: (Theorem 3): For \(k\geq 1\) and any positive \(\epsilon\), there exists a (k-\(\epsilon)\)-tough graph with \(k| G|\) even, \(| G| \geq k+1\) which has no k- factor. Reviewer: St.Znám Cited in 9 ReviewsCited in 47 Documents MSC: 05C70 Edge subsets with special properties (factorization, matching, partitioning, covering and packing, etc.) Keywords:toughness; k-factor Citations:Zbl 0256.05122 PDF BibTeX XML Cite \textit{H. Enomoto} et al., J. Graph Theory 9, No. 1, 87--95 (1985; Zbl 0598.05054) Full Text: DOI OpenURL References: [1] , and , Graphs & Digraphs. Prindle, Weber & Schmidt, Massachusetts (1979). [2] and , Graph Theory with Applications. Macmillan, London (1976). · Zbl 1226.05083 [3] Chvátal, Discrete Math. 5 pp 215– (1973) [4] Nearly k-tough graphs with no k-factor, unpublished. [5] Tutte, Canad. J. Math. 4 pp 314– (1952) · Zbl 0049.24202 This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.