zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Logik der Antinomien. (Logic of antinomies). (German) Zbl 0724.03003
Bern etc.: Peter Lang. 142 S. DM 36.00 (1990).
The author introduces his treatise as a logico-philosophical critique of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem and the Cantorian diagonal procedure used in proof of the theorem. The thesis is that if we properly understand the assumptions underlying Gödel’s and Cantor’s formulation of what they proved, we will find that there is nothing philosophically startling about these results. To establish this thesis he uses insights of Wittgenstein, Brouwer and Lorenzen to examine notions such as: The antinomies in general, the liar paradox, the set theoretic paradoxes, truth and self-reference. By themselves these examinations constitute a series of philosophical essays scrutinizing several mathematical procedures which, according to the author, have misled philosophers to think that something mysterious or wonderful was accomplished. For instance, the author argues at length that the true metalinguistic reading of a Gödelian formula is not a true, but unprovable formula, within an axiomatic arithmetic. The treatise warrants serious consideration by philosophers of mathematics. The argumentation is careful and non-technical. However, some familiarity with the technical details of the mathematics discussed is important. To a large extent, this treatise is a systematic development of Wittgenstein’s unsystematic remarks that a careful description of mathematical activity will eliminate philosophically misleading interpretations of what has been accomplished.
03A05Philosophical and critical
03-02Research monographs (mathematical logic)