zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. (English) Zbl 0970.90038
Summary: Simultaneous consideration of multiple financial ratios is required to adequately evaluate and rank the relative performance of competing companies. This paper formulates the inter-company comparison process as a multi-criteria analysis model, and presents an effective approach by modifying TOPSIS for solving the problem. The modified TOPSIS approach can identify the relevance of the financial ratios to the evaluation result, and indicate the performance difference between companies on each financial ratio. To ensure that the evaluation result is not affected by the inter-dependence of the financial ratios, objective weights are used. As a result, the comparison process is conducted on a commonly accepted basis and is independent of subjective preferences of various stakeholders. An empirical study of a real case in China is conducted to illustrate how the approach is used for the inter-company comparison problem. The result shows that the approach can reflect the decision information emitted by the financial ratios used. The comparison of objective weighting methods suggests that, with the modified TOPSIS approach, the entropy measure compares favourably with other methods for the case study conducted.

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
Full Text: DOI
[1] Barnes, A., The analysis and use of financial ratios: a review article, Journal of business and finance accounting, 14, 449-461, (1987)
[2] Davis E, Kay J. Assessing corporate performance. Business Strategy Review 1990; Summer: 1-16.
[3] van der Wijst, D., Modelling interfirm comparisons in small business, Omega, 18, 123-129, (1990)
[4] Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L., A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms, Omega, 20, 467-474, (1992)
[5] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European journal operational research, 2, 429-444, (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[6] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W.; Sun, D.B.; Huang, Z.M., Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial bank, Journal of econometrics, 46, 73-91, (1990) · Zbl 0712.90015
[7] Doyle, J.R.; Green, R.H., Comparing products using data envelopment analysis, Omega, 19, 631-638, (1991)
[8] Smith, P., Data envelopment analysis applied to financial statements, Omega, 18, 131-138, (1990)
[9] Stewart, T.J., Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis, Journal of operational research society, 47, 654-665, (1996) · Zbl 0863.90006
[10] Boussofiane, A.; Dyson, R.G.; Thanassoulis, E., Applied data envelopment analysis, European journal of operational research, 52, 1-15, (1991)
[11] Hwang CL, Yoon KS. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer, 1981.
[12] Olson DL. Decision aids for selection problems. New York: Springer, 1996.
[13] Zeleny M. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982. · Zbl 0588.90019
[14] Saaty TL. Decision making for leaders. 3rd ed. New York: RWS Publications, 1995.
[15] Barron, F.H.; Barrett, B.E., Decision quality using ranked attribute weights, Management science, 42, 1515-1523, (1996) · Zbl 0879.90002
[16] Hobbs, B.F., A comparison of weighting methods in power plant citing, Decision sciences, 11, 725-737, (1978)
[17] Schoemaker, P.J.H.; Waid, C.D., An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models, Management science, 28, 182-196, (1982)
[18] Fischer, G.W., Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multiattribute value model, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 62, 252-266, (1995)
[19] Mareschal, B., Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid, European journal of operational research, 33, 54-64, (1988) · Zbl 0634.90074
[20] Triantaphyllou, E.; Sanchez, A., A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods, Decision sciences, 28/1, 151-194, (1997)
[21] Ribeiro, R.A., Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques, Fuzzy sets and systems, 78, 155-181, (1996) · Zbl 0869.90083
[22] Yeh CH, Willis RJ, Deng H, Pan H. Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1999;119/1:in press. · Zbl 0934.91013
[23] Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L., Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method, Computers and operations research, 22, 763-770, (1995) · Zbl 0830.90079
[24] Shannon CE, Weaver, W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinios Press, 1947.
[25] Shipley, M.F.; de Korvin, A.; Obid, R., A decision making model for multi-attribute problems incorporating uncertainty and bias measures, Computers and operations research, 18, 335-342, (1991)
[26] Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC, McGee VE. Forecasting: methods and applications. New York: Wiley, 1983.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.