Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources. (English) Zbl 0978.90059

Summary: This paper presents a general methodology for numerical evaluation of complex qualitative criteria based on the theory of fuzzy sets. A special emphasis is given to the criteria frequently used in water resources decision making. Water resources’ qualitative criteria are exhibiting a high level of complexity that does not allow for an easy and reliable straightforward evaluation. Due to this complexity, a satisfying evaluation is possible neither on numerical scale nor through a direct construction of suitable fuzzy membership function. The theoretical contribution of presented research consists of the analysis and development of appropriate mathematical techniques for modeling human reasoning. Analyzed techniques include flexible decomposition methodology, construction of fuzzy sets and selection of aggregation operators that can perform justifiable aggregation of fuzzy sets. Methodology presented in this paper provides precise and consistent evaluation tool for many qualitative criteria and therefore enables a successful inclusion of these criteria into qualitative decision making model. A special attention in this paper is given to the aggregation methods. An original aggregation method named polynomial composition under pseudomeasures is developed and presented along with the four well-known aggregation methods that seem to be appropriate for the implementation in water resources decision making. The new method has been developed as a suitable aggregation operator for the case study domain: qualitative evaluation of flood control.


90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
03E72 Theory of fuzzy sets, etc.
49M27 Decomposition methods
Full Text: DOI


[1] Baffaut, C.; Chameau, J.L., Estimation of pollutant loads with fuzzy sets, Civil eng. systems, 7, 1, 51-61, (1990)
[2] Bates, G.D., Learning how to ask questions, J. management eng., 8, 1, 1-2, (1992)
[3] M. Bender, S.P. Simonovic, Fuzzy compromise programming, Water Resources Research Report No. 034, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 1996.
[4] Bezdek, J.C., A physical interpretation of fuzzy ISODATA, IEEE trans. systems, man, cybernet., 6, 5, 387-389, (1976) · Zbl 0325.68050
[5] Bilgic, T.; Turksen, I.B., Measurement-theoretical framework for fuzzy set theory, (), 552-565
[6] Blishun, F., Comparative analysis of methods of measuring fuzziness, Sov. J. comput. system sci., 27, 1, 110-126, (1989) · Zbl 0728.68097
[7] Bremermann, H., Pattern recognition, (), 116-159
[8] Cannon, R.L.; Dave, J.V.; Bezdek, J.C., An approximate fuzzy C-means algorithm, (), 153-167
[9] O. Despic, S.P. Simonovic, Methods in evaluating qualitative criteria in water resources multi-criteria decision making, Water Resources Research Report No. 037, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 1997. · Zbl 0978.90059
[10] Dombi, J., Membership function as an evaluation, Fuzzy sets and systems, 35, 1-21, (1990) · Zbl 0701.04006
[11] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications, (1980), Academic Press New York · Zbl 0444.94049
[12] Elton, D.J.; Juang, C.H.; Russell, J.S., Contractor prequalification using fuzzy sets, Civil eng. systems, 11, 1, 1-17, (1994)
[13] Esogbue, O., Dynamic programming, fuzzy sets, and the modeling of R&D management control systems, IEEE trans. systems, man, cybernet., 13, 18-30, (1983) · Zbl 0501.90054
[14] Filev, D.; Yager, R.R., On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights, Fuzzy sets and systems, 94, 157-169, (1998)
[15] Grivas, D.A.; Shen, Y.-C., A fuzzy set approach for pavement damage assessments, Civil eng. systems, 8, 1, 37-47, (1991)
[16] Haimes, Y.Y., Hierarchical analyses of water resources systems, (1977), McGraw-Hill International Book Co New York
[17] Hersh, H.M.; Caramazza, A., A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language, J. exp. psychol.: general, 105, 3, 254-276, (1976)
[18] Homaifar, A.; McCormick, E., Simultaneous design of membership functions and rule sets for fuzzy controllers using genetic algorithms, IEEE trans. fuzzy systems, 3, 2, 129-139, (1995)
[19] Juang, C.H.; Huang, X.H.; Elton, D.J., Fuzzy information processing by the Monte Carlo simulation techniques, Civil eng. systems, 8, 1, 19-25, (1991)
[20] Juang, C.H.; Huang, X.H.; Schiff, S.D., Determination of weights of criteria for decision making by the fuzzy eigenvector method, Civil eng. systems, 9, 1, 1-16, (1992)
[21] Juang, C.H.; Lee, K.; Chen, J.W., A new approach for siting landfills using fuzzy sets, Civil eng. systems, 12, 2, 85-104, (1995)
[22] Kandel, A., Fuzzy techniques in pattern recognition, (1982), Wiley New York · Zbl 0552.68067
[23] Kaufmann, A.; Gupta, M.M., Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic, (1985), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc New York · Zbl 0588.94023
[24] Kaufmann, A.; Gupta, M.M., Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science, (1988), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V Amsterdam · Zbl 0683.90024
[25] Kochen, M.; Badre, A.N., On the precision of adjectives which denote fuzzy sets, J. cybernet., 4, 1, 49-59, (1974) · Zbl 0315.68070
[26] Lund, J.R.; Palmer, R.N., Subjective evaluation: linguistic scale in pairwise comparison methods, Civil eng. systems, 3, 4, 182-186, (1986)
[27] MacVicar-Whelan, P.J., Fuzzy sets, the concept of height, and the hedge VERY, IEEE trans. systems man cybernet, 8, 6, 507-511, (1978)
[28] Murthy, S.; Sinha, K.C., A fuzzy set approach for bridge traffic safety evaluation, Civil eng. systems, 7, 1, 36-43, (1990)
[29] Norwich, M.; Turksen, I.B., Measurement and scaling of membership functions, (), 2851-2858
[30] Orlovski, S.A., Calculus of decomposable properties, fuzzy sets and decisions, (1994), Academic Press New York · Zbl 0822.90003
[31] Pal, S.K.; Majumder, D.K.D., Fuzzy mathematical approach to pattern recognition, (1986), Wiley Eastern Limited New Delhi
[32] Pedrycz, W., Fuzzy sets engineering, (1995), CRC Press Boca Raton, FL · Zbl 0925.93507
[33] Saaty, T.L., Measuring the fuzziness of sets, J. cybernet., 4, 4, 53-62, (1974) · Zbl 0319.02060
[34] D.A. Savic, An intelligent decision-support system and use of fuzzy sets for reservoir analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 1990.
[35] S.P. Simonovic, Risk in sustainable water resources management, in: D. Rosbjerg et al. (Eds.), Sustainability of Water Resources Under Increasing Uncertainty, IAHS Publication No. 240, 1997, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, pp. 3-17.
[36] Smith, P.N., An application of fuzzy sets to transport project appraisal, Civil eng. systems, 11, 4, 263-286, (1995)
[37] Teodorovic, D.; Kikuchi, S., Application of fuzzy sets theory to the saving based vehicle algorithm, Civil eng. systems, 8, 2, 87-94, (1991)
[38] Triantaphyllou, E.; Pardalos, P.M.; Mann, S.H., Minimization approach to membership evaluation in fuzzy sets and error analysis, J. optim. theory appl., 66, 2, 275-287, (1990) · Zbl 0683.90005
[39] Trivedi, M.M., Analysis of aerial images using fuzzy clustering, (), 133-151
[40] Tucker, W.T., Counterexamples to the convergence theorem for the fuzzy C-means clustering, (), 109-121
[41] Yager, R.R., On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE trans. systems man cybernet., 18, 1, 183-190, (1988) · Zbl 0637.90057
[42] R.R. Yager, Including importances in OWA aggregations using fuzzy systems modeling, Technical Report # MII-1625, Machine Intelligence Institute, Iona College, 1996.
[43] Yager, R.R., On the inclusion of importances in OWA aggregation, ()
[44] Zadeh, L.A., A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts, (), 147-192 · Zbl 0332.68068
[45] Zimmermann, H.-J., Fuzzy sets, decision making and expert systems, (1987), Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston
[46] Zimmermann, H.-J., Fuzzy set theory and its application, (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston · Zbl 0845.04006
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.