Cryptanalysis of the TTM cryptosystem.

*(English)*Zbl 0980.94017
Okamoto, Tatsuaki (ed.), Advances in cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2000. 6th international conference on the Theory and application of cryptology and information security, Kyoto, Japan, December 3-7, 2000. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1976, 44-57 (2000).

Summary: H. Fell and W. Diffie proposed constructing trapdoor functions with multivariate equations [Proc. Crypto ‘85, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 218, 340-349 (1985)]. They used several sequentially solved stages that combine into a triangular system we call T. In the present paper, we study a more general family of TPM (for “Triangle Plus Minus”) schemes: a triangular construction mixed with some \(u\) random polynomials and with some \(r\) of the beginning equations removed. We go beyond all previous attacks proposed on such cryptosystems using a low degree component of the inverse function. The cryptanalysis of TPM is reduced to a simple linear algebra problem called \(\text{MinRank}(r)\): Find a linear combination of given matrices that has a small rank \(r\). We introduce a new attack for MinRank called ‘Kernel Attack’ that works for \(q^r\) small. We explain that TPM schemes can be used in encryption only if \(q^r\) is small and therefore they are not secure. As an application, we show that the TTM cryptosystem proposed by T. T. Moh at CrypTec’99 (*) [Communications in Algebra 27, 2207-2222 (1999; Zbl 0933.94022) and Proc. CrypTEC’99, Int. Workshop Cryptographic Techniques and E-commerce, Hong-Kong City University Press, 63-69 (1999), available at http://www.usdsi.com/cryptec.ps] reduces to MinRank(2). Thus, though the cleartext size is 512 bits, we break it in \({\mathcal O}(2^{52})\). The particular TTM of (*) can be broken in \({\mathcal O}(2^{28})\) due to additional weaknesses, and we needed only a few minutes to solve the challenge TTM 2.1. from the website of the TTM selling company, US Data Security. We also studied TPM in signature, possible only if \(q^u\) small. It is equally insecure: the ‘Degeneracy Attack’ we introduce runs in \(q^u\cdot\) polynomial.

For the entire collection see [Zbl 0952.00064].

For the entire collection see [Zbl 0952.00064].

##### MSC:

94A60 | Cryptography |