zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

A new nonparametric method for variance estimation and confidence interval construction for Spearman’s rank correlation. (English) Zbl 1043.62021
Spearman’s rank correlation, \(\rho_{s}\), has become one of the most widely used nonparametric statistical techniques. However, explicit formulas for the finite sample variance of its point estimate, \(\widehat\rho_{s}\), are generally not available, except under special conditions, and the estimation of this variance from observed data remains a challenging statistical problem. We show that \(\widehat\rho_{s}\) can be calculated from a two-way contingency table with categories defined by the bivariate ranks. We note that this table has the “empirical bivariate quantile-partitioned” (EBQP) distribution [the author et al., Biometrics 53, 1054–1069 (1997; Zbl 0896.62114)], and hence \(\widehat\rho_{s}\) belongs to the class of statistics with distributions derived from the EBQP distribution.
The study of \(\widehat\rho_{s}\) provides an opportunity to extend large sample EBQP methods to handle the special challenges posed by statistics calculated from EBQP tables defined by bivariate ranks. We present extensive simulations to study the estimation of the sample variance of \(\widehat\rho_{s}\) and the coverage of confidence intervals for this measure. We compare these results for the EBQP method with those for the bootstrap and jackknife algorithms. We illustrate the use of these nonparametric methods on two data sets, Spearman’s original data set and an example from nutritional epidemiology.
These results demonstrate that standard EBQP methods can be successfully adapted for the estimation of the sample variance of \(\widehat\rho_{s}\). They also suggest that EBQP methods should be used to estimate the sample variances of other nonparametric statistics calculated from bivariate ranks, such as Kendall’s tau.

62G05 Nonparametric estimation
62H17 Contingency tables
62G15 Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions
62H20 Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.)
bootstrap; GAUSS
Full Text: DOI
[1] Aptech Systems, Inc., 1992. The GAUSS System, Version 3.0. Aptech Systems, Maple Valley, Washington.
[2] Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., Holland, P.W., 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. · Zbl 0332.62039
[3] Borkowf, C. B.; Gail, M. H.; Carroll, R. J.; Gill, R. D.: Analyzing bivariate continuous data grouped into categories defined by empirical quantiles of the marginal distributions. Biometrics 53, 1054-1069 (1997) · Zbl 0896.62114
[4] David, F. N.; Mallows, C. L.: The variance of spearman’s rho in normal samples. Biometrika 48, 19-28 (1961) · Zbl 0133.12003
[5] Efron, B., Tibshirani, R., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York. · Zbl 0835.62038
[6] Fieller, E. C.; Hartley, H. O.; Pearson, E. S.: Tests for rank correlation coefficients. I. biometrika 44, 470-481 (1957) · Zbl 0082.35103
[7] Fisher, R. A.: On the probable error of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron 1, 1-32 (1921)
[8] Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., 1972. Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0248.62021
[9] Kraemer, H. C.: The non-null distribution of spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. J. amer. Statist. assoc. 69, 114-117 (1974) · Zbl 0283.62016
[10] Lee, A.J., 1990. U-Statistics: Theory and Practice. Marcel Dekker, New York. · Zbl 0771.62001
[11] Lehmann, E. L.: Some concepts of dependence. Ann. math. Statist. 37, 1137-1153 (1966) · Zbl 0146.40601
[12] Lehmann, E.L., 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA. · Zbl 0354.62038
[13] Muirhead, R.J., 1982. Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0556.62028
[14] Parzen, E.: Nonparametric statistical data modeling. J. amer. Statist. assoc. 74, 105-121 (1979) · Zbl 0407.62001
[15] Pearson, K., 1907. On Further Methods of Determining Correlation. Drapers’ Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series IV, Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution, XVI. Dulau, London. · JFM 38.0290.04
[16] Pietinen, P.; Hartman, A. M.; Haapa, E.; Rasanen, L.; Haapakoski, J.; Palmgren, J.; Albanes, D.; Virtamo, J.; Huttunen, J. K.: Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 128, 655-666 (1988)
[17] Plackett, R.L., 1981. The Analysis of Categorical Data, 2nd Edition. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York. · Zbl 0479.62046
[18] Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of association between two things. Amer. J. Psychol. 15, 72-101 (1904)
[19] Spearman, C.: ’Footrule’ for measuring correlation. British J. Psychol. 2, 89-108 (1906)
[20] Sundrum, R. M.: A method of systematic sampling based on order properties. Biometrika 40, 452-456 (1953) · Zbl 0051.10801
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.