##
**Relating the classical covariance adjustment techniques of multivariate growth curve models to modern univariate mixed effects models.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1059.62678

Summary: The relationship between the modern univariate mixed model for analyzing longitudinal data, popularized by N. M. Laird and J. H. Ware [Biometrics 38, 963–974 (1982; Zbl 0512.62107)], and its predecessor, the classical multivariate growth curve model, summarized by J.E. Grizzle and Allen [Biometrics 25, 357–381 (1969)], has never been clearly established. Here, the link between the two methodologies is derived, and balanced polynomial and cosinor examples cited in the literature are analyzed with both approaches. Relating the two models demonstrates that classical covariance adjustment for higher-order terms is analogous to including them as random effects in the mixed model. The polynomial example clearly illustrates the relationship between the methodologies and shows their equivalence when all matrices are properly defined. The cosinor example demonstrates how results from each method may differ when the total variance-covariance matrix is positive definite, but that the between-subjects component of that matrix is not so constrained by the growth curve approach. Additionally, advocates of each approach tend to consider different covariance structures. Modern mixed model analysts consider only those terms in a model’s expectation (or linear combinations), and preferably the most parsimonious subset, as candidates for random effects. Classical growth curve analysts automatically consider all terms in a model’s expectation as random effects and then investigate whether “covariance adjusting” for higher-order terms improves the model. We apply mixed model techniques to cosinor analyses of a large, unbalanced data set to demonstrate the relevance of classical covariance structures that were previously conceived for use only with completely balanced data.

### MSC:

62P10 | Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis |

### Citations:

Zbl 0512.62107
PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{S. K. Mikulich} et al., Biometrics 55, No. 3, 957--964 (1999; Zbl 1059.62678)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Crowley, Variability in simian motor and social behavior with alternating-day acetylmethadol, Psychopharmacology 85 pp 353– (1985) |

[2] | Crowley, Acetylmethadol versus methadone: Human mood and motility, Psychopharmacology 86 pp 458– (1985) |

[3] | Grizzle, Analysis of growth and dose response curves, Biometrics 25 pp 357– (1969) |

[4] | Harville, Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems, Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 pp 320– (1977) · Zbl 0373.62040 |

[5] | Jones, Serial correlation or random subject effect?, Communications in Statistics B, Simulation and Computation 19 pp 1105– (1990) · Zbl 0850.62654 |

[6] | Jones, Longitudinal Data with Serial Correlation: A State-Space Approach (1993) · Zbl 0851.62059 |

[7] | Khatri, A note on a MANOVA model applied to problems in growth curves, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 18 pp 75– (1966) · Zbl 0136.40704 |

[8] | Kshirsagar, Growth Curves (1995) |

[9] | Laird, Random effects models for longitudinal data, Biometrics 38 pp 963– (1982) · Zbl 0512.62107 |

[10] | Laird, Maximum likelihood computations with repeated measures: Application of the EM algorithm, Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (397) pp 97– (1987) · Zbl 0613.62063 |

[11] | Lange, The effect of covariance structure on variance estimation in balanced growth-curve models with random parameters, Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 (405) pp 241– (1989) · Zbl 0678.62070 |

[12] | Potthoff, A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems, Biometrika 51 pp 313– (1964) · Zbl 0138.14306 |

[13] | Rao, Some statistical methods for comparison of growth curves, Biometrics 14 pp 1– (1958) · Zbl 0079.35704 |

[14] | Rao, Some problems involving linear hypotheses in multivariate analysis, Biometrika 46 pp 49– (1959) · Zbl 0108.15405 |

[15] | Rao, The theory of least squares when the parameters are stochastic and its application to the analysis of growth curves, Biometrika 52 pp 447– (1965) · Zbl 0203.21501 |

[16] | Rao, Multivariate Analysis pp 87– (1966) |

[17] | Rao, Least squares theory using an estimated dispersion matrix and its application to measurement of signals, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1 pp 357– (1967) · Zbl 0189.18503 |

[18] | SAS Institute, SAS/STAT User’s Guide Release 6.03 pp 549– (1988) |

[19] | SAS Institute, SAS/STAT Software Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11 pp 531– (1986) |

[20] | Vonesh, Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements (1997) · Zbl 0893.62077 |

[21] | Ware, Circadian rhythm analysis when output is collected at intervals, Biometrics 33 pp 566– (1977) |

[22] | Zerbe, On application of growth curve techniques to time series data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (371) pp 507– (1980) · Zbl 0454.62080 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.