zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Dynamic asymmetric leverage in stochastic volatility models. (English) Zbl 1075.62092
Summary: In the class of stochastic volatility (SV) models, leverage effects are typically specified through the direct correlation between the innovations in both returns and volatility, resulting in the dynamic leverage (DL) model. Recently, two asymmetric SV models based on threshold effects have been proposed in the literature. As such models consider only the sign of the previous return and neglect its magnitude, this paper proposes a dynamic asymmetric leverage (DAL) model that accommodates the direct correlation as well as the sign and magnitude of the threshold effects. A special case of the DAL model with zero direct correlation between the innovations is the asymmetric leverage (AL) model. The dynamic asymmetric leverage models are estimated by the Monte Carlo likelihood (MCL) method. Monte Carlo experiments are presented to examine the finite sample properties of the estimator. For a sample size of \(T=2000\) with 500 replications, the sample means, standard deviations, and root mean squared errors of the MCL estimators indicate only a small finite sample bias. The empirical estimates for S&P 500 and TOPIX financial returns, and USD/AUD and YEN/USD exchange rates, indicate that the DAL class, including the DL and AL models, is generally superior to threshold SV models with respect to AIC and BIC, with AL typically providing the best fit to the data.

62P05 Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics
65C05 Monte Carlo methods
91B28 Finance etc. (MSC2000)
Full Text: DOI
[1] DOI: 10.1023/A:1010093608857 · Zbl 1153.91754
[2] Asai , M. ( 2005 ). Autoregressive stochastic volatility models with heavy-tailed distribution: a comparison with multi-factor volatility models . Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Economics , Tokyo Metropolitan University .
[3] Asai , M. , McAleer , M. ( 2004 ). Dynamic leverage and threshold effects in stochastic volatility models . Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Economics , Tokyo Metropolitan University .
[4] Black F., 1976 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Business and Economic Statistics Section pp 177– (1976)
[5] DOI: 10.2307/2330812
[6] DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(82)90018-6
[7] DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90070-1 · Zbl 0825.62953
[8] Glosten L., Journal of Finance 46 pp 1779– (1992)
[9] DOI: 10.2307/1392251
[10] DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(94)00821-H
[11] DOI: 10.2307/1392199
[12] DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199605)11:3<253::AID-JAE393>3.0.CO;2-8
[13] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/65.2.297 · Zbl 0386.62079
[14] DOI: 10.1017/S0266466605050140 · Zbl 1072.62104
[15] DOI: 10.2307/2938260 · Zbl 0722.62069
[16] DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00016-5 · Zbl 0937.62110
[17] DOI: 10.1080/07474939808800402 · Zbl 0965.62075
[18] DOI: 10.1002/for.840 · Zbl 04578303
[19] DOI: 10.2307/1912934 · Zbl 0459.62051
[20] DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(87)90009-2
[21] DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90076-P · Zbl 0725.62064
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.