zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

On estimation in binary autologistic spatial models. (English) Zbl 1088.62069
Summary: There is a large and increasing literature on methods of estimation for spatial data with binary responses. The goal of this article is to describe some of these methods for the autologistic spatial model, and to discuss computational issues associated with them. The main way we do this is via illustration using a spatial epidemiology data set involving liver cancer. We first demonstrate why maximum likelihood is not currently feasible as a method of estimation in the spatial setting with binary data using the autologistic model. We then discuss alternative methods, including pseudo likelihood, generalized pseudo likelihood, and Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimators. We describe their asymptotic efficiencies and the computational effort required to compute them. These three methods are applied to the data set and compared in a simulation experiment.

62H11 Directional data; spatial statistics
62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
62M30 Inference from spatial processes
65C05 Monte Carlo methods
PDF BibTeX Cite
Full Text: DOI
[1] Snow J., On the Mode of Communication of Cholera, 2. ed. (1855)
[2] Riggan W. B., U.S. Cancer Mortality Rates and Trends, 1950–1979 (1987)
[3] Besag J., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 23 pp 192– (1974)
[4] Cressie N. A.C., Statistics for Spatial Data (1993) · Zbl 0799.62002
[5] DOI: 10.2307/2987782
[6] Geman, S. and Graffigne, C. Markov random field image models and their applications to computer vision. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Berkeley, CA. · Zbl 0665.68067
[7] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176348532 · Zbl 0787.62100
[8] Guyon X., Stochastic Models, Statistical Methods, and Algorithms in Image Analysis 74 pp 177– (1992)
[9] DOI: 10.2307/2531916 · Zbl 0707.62219
[10] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347265 · Zbl 0684.62035
[11] Liu R., Exploring the Limits of Bootstrap (1992)
[12] DOI: 10.1016/0167-7152(91)90045-S · Zbl 0722.62016
[13] DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176325770 · Zbl 0828.62044
[14] DOI: 10.2307/2290851 · Zbl 0798.62047
[15] DOI: 10.2307/2669538 · Zbl 1013.62077
[16] DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3758(98)00123-2 · Zbl 0941.62051
[17] DOI: 10.1023/A:1016170102988 · Zbl 1095.62514
[18] DOI: 10.2307/2289128 · Zbl 0621.62091
[19] DOI: 10.1214/lnms/1215460515
[20] Moyeed R. A., Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 18 pp 39– (1991)
[21] Geyer C. J., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 54 pp 657– (1992)
[22] DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(95)00071-2 · Zbl 0851.62067
[23] DOI: 10.2307/3109759 · Zbl 1058.62677
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.