Optimal investment choices post-retirement in a defined contribution pension scheme.

*(English)*Zbl 1093.91027Summary: In defined contribution pension schemes, the financial risk is borne by the member. Financial risk occurs both during the accumulation phase (investment risk) and at retirement, when the annuity is bought (annuity risk). The annuity risk faced by the member can be reduced through the “income drawdown option”: the retiree is allowed to choose when to convert the final capital into pension within a certain period of time after retirement. In some countries, there is a limiting age when annuitization becomes compulsory (in UK this age is 75). In the interim, the member can withdraw periodic amounts of money to provide for daily life, within certain limits imposed by the scheme’s rules (or by law).

In this paper, we investigate the income drawdown option and define a stochastic optimal control problem, looking for optimal investment strategies to be adopted after retirement, when allowing for periodic fixed withdrawals from the fund. The risk attitude of the member is also considered, by changing a parameter in the disutility function chosen. We find that there is a natural target level of the fund, interpretable as a safety level, which can never be exceeded when optimal control is used.

Numerical examples are presented in order to analyse various indices - relevant to the pensioner - when the optimal investment allocation is adopted. These indices include, for example, the risk of outliving the assets before annuitization occurs (risk of ruin), the average time of ruin, the probability of reaching a certain pension target (that is greater than or equal to the pension that the member could buy immediately on retirement), the final outcome that can be reached (distribution of annuity that can be bought at limit age), and how the risk attitude of the member affects the key performance measures mentioned above.

In this paper, we investigate the income drawdown option and define a stochastic optimal control problem, looking for optimal investment strategies to be adopted after retirement, when allowing for periodic fixed withdrawals from the fund. The risk attitude of the member is also considered, by changing a parameter in the disutility function chosen. We find that there is a natural target level of the fund, interpretable as a safety level, which can never be exceeded when optimal control is used.

Numerical examples are presented in order to analyse various indices - relevant to the pensioner - when the optimal investment allocation is adopted. These indices include, for example, the risk of outliving the assets before annuitization occurs (risk of ruin), the average time of ruin, the probability of reaching a certain pension target (that is greater than or equal to the pension that the member could buy immediately on retirement), the final outcome that can be reached (distribution of annuity that can be bought at limit age), and how the risk attitude of the member affects the key performance measures mentioned above.

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{R. Gerrard} et al., Insur. Math. Econ. 35, No. 2, 321--342 (2004; Zbl 1093.91027)

Full Text:
DOI

##### References:

[1] | Albrecht, P.; Maurer, R., Self-annuitization, consumption shortfall in retirement and asset allocation: the annuity benchmark, Journal of pension economics and finance, 1, 269-288, (2002) |

[2] | Björk, T., 1998. Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time. Oxford University Press. |

[3] | Blake, D.; Cairns, A.J.G.; Dowd, K., Pensionmetrics 2: stochastic pension plan design during the distribution phase, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 33, 29-47, (2003) · Zbl 1043.62086 |

[4] | Bordley, R.; Li Calzi, M., Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions, Decisions in economics and finance, 23, 53-74, (2000) · Zbl 1051.91503 |

[5] | Boulier, J.-F., Trussant, E., Florens, D., 1995. A dynamic model for pension funds management. In: Proceedings of the 5th AFIR International Colloquium 1, pp. 361-384. |

[6] | Boulier, J.-F., Michel, S., Wisnia, V., 1996. Optimising investment and contribution policies of a defined benefit pension fund. In: Proceedings of the 6th AFIR International Colloquium 1, pp. 593-607. |

[7] | Boulier, J.-F.; Huang, S.J.; Taillard, G., Optimal management under stochastic interest rates: the case of a protected defined contribution pension fund, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 28, 173-189, (2001) · Zbl 0976.91034 |

[8] | Browne, S., Optimal investment policies for a firm with a random risk process: exponential utility and minimizing the probability of ruin, Mathematics of operations research, 20, 937-958, (1995) · Zbl 0846.90012 |

[9] | Browne, S., Survival and growth with a liability: optimal portfolio strategies in continuous time, Mathematics of operations research, 22, 468-493, (1997) · Zbl 0883.90011 |

[10] | Cairns, A.J.G., Some notes on the dynamics and optimal control of stochastic pension fund models in continuous time, ASTIN bulletin, 30, 19-55, (2000) · Zbl 1018.91028 |

[11] | Charupat, N.; Milevsky, M.A., Optimal asset allocation in life annuities: a note, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 30, 199-209, (2002) · Zbl 1074.91548 |

[12] | Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., 1987. Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York. |

[13] | Findlater, A., 1999. The annuity – a proposal. The Actuary. |

[14] | Gerrard, R., Haberman, S., Højgaard, B., Vigna, E., 2004. The income drawdown option: quadratic loss. Actuarial Research Paper No. 155. Cass Business School, City University, London. |

[15] | Haberman, S.; Vigna, E., Optimal investment strategies and risk measures in defined contribution pension schemes, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 31, 35-69, (2002) · Zbl 1039.91025 |

[16] | Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A., Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263-291, (1979) · Zbl 0411.90012 |

[17] | Kapur, S., Orszag, J.M., 1999. A portfolio approach to investment and annuitization during retirement. In: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, London. |

[18] | Khorasanee, M.Z., Annuity choices for pensioners, Journal of actuarial practice, 4, 229-235, (1996) · Zbl 1098.91541 |

[19] | Lunnon, M., 2002. Annuitization and alternatives. In: Proceedings of the Transactions of the 27th International Congress of Actuaries, Cancun. |

[20] | Merton, R., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous time case, Review of economics and statistics, 51, 247-257, (1969) |

[21] | Milevsky, M.A., Optimal asset allocation towards the end of the life cycle: to annuitize or not to annuitize?, Journal of risk and insurance, 65, 401-426, (1998) |

[22] | Milevsky, M.A.; Robinson, C., Self-annuitization and ruin in retirement, North American actuarial journal, 4, 112-129, (2000) · Zbl 1083.60515 |

[23] | Mitchell, O.S.; Poterba, J.M.; Warshawsky, M.J.; Brown, J.R., New evidence on the money’s worth of individual annuities, American economic review, 89, 1299-1318, (1999) |

[24] | Øksendal, B., 1998. Stochastic Differential Equations, 5th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. · Zbl 0897.60056 |

[25] | Orszag, J.M., 2000. The annuities: the problem. In: Presented at the NAPF Annual Conference, May 11-12, 2000. |

[26] | Wadsworth, M., Findlater, A., Boardman, T., 2001. Reinventing annuities. Staple Inn Actuarial Society, London. |

[27] | Yaari, M.E., Uncertain lifetime, life insurance and the theory of the consumer, Review of economic studies, 32, 137-150, (1965) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.