A parametric approach to correspondence analysis. (English) Zbl 1096.62061

Summary: We compare correspondence analysis (CA) and an alternative approach using the Hellinger distance (HD), for representing categorical data in a contingency table. As both methods may be appropriate, we introduce a parameter and define a generalized version of correspondence analysis (GCA) which contains CA and HD as particular cases. Comparison with alternative approaches are performed. We propose a coefficient which globally measures the similarity between CA and GCA, which can be decomposed into several components, one component for each principal dimension, indicating the contribution of the dimensions on the difference between both representations. Two criteria for choosing the best value of the parameter are proposed.


62H25 Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis
62H17 Contingency tables
Full Text: DOI


[1] Aitchison, J.; Greenacre, M.J., Biplots of compositional data, Appl. stat., 51, 375-392, (2000) · Zbl 1111.62300
[2] Arenas, C.; Cuadras, C.M., Comparing two methods for joint representation of multivariate data, Comm. statist. simulation comput., 33, 415-430, (2004) · Zbl 1100.62501
[3] Cox, T.F.; Cox, M.A., Multidimensional scaling, (2001), Chapman and Hall London · Zbl 1004.91067
[4] Cuadras, C.M., Correspondence analysis and diagonal expansions in terms of distribution functions, J. statist. plann. inference, 103, 137-150, (2002) · Zbl 0988.62035
[5] Cuadras, C.M.; Fortiana, J., Weighted continuous metric scaling, (), 27-40 · Zbl 0905.62067
[6] Cuadras, C.M.; Fortiana, J.; Oliva, F., The proximity of an individual to a population with applications in discriminant analysis, J. classification, 14, 117-136, (1997) · Zbl 0891.62043
[7] Cuadras, C.M.; Fortiana, J., Visualizing categorical data with related metric scaling, (), 365-376
[8] Cuadras, C.M.; Fortiana, J.; Greenacre, M.J., Continuous extensions of matrix formulations in correspondence analysis, with applications to the FGM family of distributions, (), 101-116
[9] C.M. Cuadras, M.J. Greenacre, Comparing three methods for representing categorical data, IMUB, Barcelona, Mathematics Preprint Series, 2003, no. 341. · Zbl 1093.62061
[10] Friendly, M., Extending mosaic displays: marginal, conditional, and partial views of categorical data, J. comput. graph. statist., 8, 373-395, (1999)
[11] Gower, J.C., Adding a point to vector diagrams in multivariate analysis, Psychometrika, 55, 582-585, (1968) · Zbl 0167.17802
[12] Gower, J.C.; Hand, D.J., Biplots, (1996), Chapman and Hall London · Zbl 0867.62053
[13] Greenacre, M.J., Theory and applications of correspondence analysis, (1984), Academic Press London · Zbl 0726.62087
[14] Khattree, R.; Naik, D.N., Association in contingency tables, correspondence analysis and (modified) Andrews plots, (), 311-326 · Zbl 1127.62366
[15] Rao, C.R., The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification (with discussion), J. roy. statist. soc. B, 10, 159-193, (1948) · Zbl 0034.07902
[16] Rao, C.R., A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondence analysis using Hellinger distance, Qüestiió, 19, 23-63, (1995) · Zbl 1167.62421
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.