##
**Economic implications of using a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection: a comparison with mean-variance analysis.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1131.91325

Summary: We relate value at risk (VaR) to mean-variance analysis and examine the economic implications of using a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection. When comparing two mean-variance efficient portfolios, the higher variance portfolio might have less VaR. Consequently, an efficient portfolio that globally minimizes VaR may not exist. Surprisingly, we show that it is plausible for certain risk-averse agents to end up selecting portfolios with larger standard deviations if they switch from using variance to VaR as a measure of risk. Therefore, regulators should be aware that VaR is not an unqualified improvement over variance as a measure of risk.

### MSC:

91G10 | Portfolio theory |

91B30 | Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010) |

91G70 | Statistical methods; risk measures |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{G. J. Alexander} and \textit{A. M. Baptista}, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 26, No. 7--8, 1159--1193 (2002; Zbl 1131.91325)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Ahn, D.-H.; Boudoukh, J.; Richardson, M.; Whitelaw, R.F., Optimal risk management using options, Journal of finance, 54, 359-375, (1999) |

[2] | Artzner, P.; Delbaen, F.; Eber, J.-M.; Heath, D., Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical finance, 9, 203-228, (1999) · Zbl 0980.91042 |

[3] | Basak, S., Shapiro, A., 2001. Value-at-risk management: optimal policies and asset prices. Review of Financial Studies 14, 371-405. |

[4] | Baumol, W.J., An expected gain-confidence limit criterion for portfolio selection, Management science, 10, 174-182, (1963) |

[5] | Bawa, V.S.; Lindenberg, E.B., Capital market equilibrium in a Mean-lower partial moment framework, Journal of financial economics, 5, 189-200, (1977) |

[6] | Black, F., Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing, Journal of business, 45, 444-455, (1972) |

[7] | Black, F.; Litterman, R.B., Global portfolio optimization, Financial analysts journal, 48, 28-43, (1992) |

[8] | Blattberg, R.C.; Gonedes, N.J., A comparison of the stable and student distributions as statistical models for stock prices, Journal of business, 47, 244-280, (1974) |

[9] | Brennan, M.J., Capital market equilibrium with divergent borrowing and lending rates, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 6, 1197-1205, (1971) |

[10] | Dowd, K., Beyond value at risk: the new science of risk management, (1998), Wiley Chichester, England · Zbl 0924.90013 |

[11] | Duffie, D.; Pan, J., An overview of value at risk, Journal of derivatives, 4, 7-49, (1997) |

[12] | Durrett, R., Probability: theory and examples, (1991), Wadsworth New York · Zbl 0709.60002 |

[13] | Elton, E.J.; Gruber, M.J., Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis, (1995), Wiley New York |

[14] | Fishburn, P.C., Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns, American economic review, 67, 116-126, (1977) |

[15] | Friend, I.; Blume, M., Measurement of portfolio performance under uncertainty, American economic review, 60, 561-575, (1970) |

[16] | Hogan, W.W.; Warren, J.M., Computation of the efficient boundary in the E-S portfolio selection model, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 7, 1881-1896, (1972) |

[17] | Hogan, W.W.; Warren, J.M., Toward the development of an equilibrium capital-market model based on semivariance, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 9, 1-11, (1974) |

[18] | Huang, C.; Litzenberger, R.H., Foundations for financial economics, (1988), Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ · Zbl 0677.90001 |

[19] | Hull, J.C., Options, futures, & other derivatives, (2000), Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ · Zbl 1087.91025 |

[20] | Hull, J.C.; White, A., Value-at-risk when daily changes in market variables are not normally distributed, Journal of derivatives, 5, 9-19, (1998) |

[21] | Jackson, P.; Maude, D.J.; Perraudin, W., Bank capital and value at risk, Journal of derivatives, 4, 73-89, (1997) |

[22] | Jorion, P., Risk^{2}: measuring the risk in value at risk, Financial analysts journal, 52, 47-56, (1996) |

[23] | Jorion, P., Value at risk: the new benchmark for controlling market risk, (1997), McGraw-Hill New York |

[24] | Levy, H.; Markowitz, H.M., Approximating expected utility by a function of Mean and variance, American economic review, 47, 308-317, (1979) |

[25] | Linsmeier, T.J.; Pearson, N.D., Value at risk, Financial analysts journal, 56, 47-67, (2000) |

[26] | Lintner, J., The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, Review of economics and statistics, 47, 13-37, (1965) |

[27] | Merton, R.C., An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 7, 1851-1872, (1972) |

[28] | Michaud, R.O., Efficient asset allocation: A practical guide to stock portfolio optimization and asset allocation, (1998), Harvard Business School Press Boston |

[29] | Mossin, J., Equilibrium in a capital asset market, Econometrica, 34, 768-783, (1966) |

[30] | Roll, R., A critique of the asset pricing Theory’s tests: part I. on past and potential testability of the theory, Journal of financial economics, 4, 129-176, (1977) |

[31] | Roy, A.D., Safety first and the holding of assets, Econometrica, 20, 431-449, (1952) · Zbl 0047.38805 |

[32] | Sharpe, W.F., Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of finance, 29, 425-442, (1964) |

[33] | Sharpe, W.F., Asset allocation tools, (1987), The Scientific Press Redwood City, California |

[34] | Sharpe, W.F.; Alexander, G.J.; Bailey, J.V., Investments, (1999), Prentice-Hall New York |

[35] | Solnik, B.H., International investments, (1991), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, MA |

[36] | Telser, L.G., Safety first and hedging, Review of economic studies, 23, 1-16, (1955) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.