Optimal consumption and portfolio choice for pooled annuity funds. (English) Zbl 1140.91411

Summary: This paper presents the optimal continuous time dynamic consumption and portfolio choice for pooled annuity funds. A pooled annuity fund constitutes an alternative way to protect against mortality risk compared to purchasing a life annuity. The crucial difference between the pooled annuity fund and purchase of a life annuity offered by an insurance company is that participants of a pooled annuity fund still have to bear some mortality risk while insured annuitants bear no mortality risk at all. The population of the pool is modelled by employing a Poisson process with time-dependent hazard-rate. It follows that the pool member’s optimization problem has to account for the stochastic investment horizon and for jumps in wealth which occur if another pool member dies. In case the number of pool members goes to infinity analytical solutions are provided. For finite pool sizes the solution of the optimization problem is reduced to the numerical solution of a set of ODEs. A simulation and welfare analysis show that pooled annuity funds insure very effectively against longevity risk even if their pool size is rather small. Only very risk averse investors or those without access to small pools are more inclined to pay a risk premium to access private life annuity markets in order to lay off mortality risk completely. As even families constitute such small pools the model provides theoretical justification for the low empirical annuity demand.


91B28 Finance etc. (MSC2000)
91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
Full Text: DOI


[1] Abel, A.; Warshawsky, M., Specification and the joy of giving: insights from altruism, The review of economics and statistics, 70, 145-149, (1988)
[2] Albrecht, P.; Maurer, R., Self-annuitization, consumption shortfall in retirement and asset allocation: the annuity benchmark, Journal of pension economics and finance, 1, 3, 269-288, (2002)
[3] Ameriks, J.; Veres, R.; Warshawsky, M., Making retirement income last a lifetime, Journal of financial planning, December, 60-76, (2001)
[4] Babbel, D., Merrill, C., 2006. Rational decumulation. Discussion paper, Wharton Financial Institutions Center No. 06-14
[5] Bengen, W., Determining withdrawal rates using historical data, Journal of financial planning, 7, 4, 171-180, (1994)
[6] Bengen, W., Conserving client portfolios during retirement, part 3, Journal of financial planning, 10, 6, 84-97, (1997)
[7] Bernheim, D.; Shleifer, A.; Summers, L., The strategic bequest motive, The journal of political economy, 93, 1045-1076, (1985)
[8] Brown, J.; Mitchell, O.; Poterba, J.; Warshawsky, M., The role of annuity markets in financing retirement, (2001), MIT Press Cambridge, MA
[9] Cairns, A.; Blake, D.; Dowd, K., Stochastic lifestyling: optimal dynamic asset allocation for defined-contribution pension plans, Journal of economic dynamics and control, 30, 843-877, (2006) · Zbl 1200.91297
[10] Cocco, J.; Gomes, F.; Maenhout, P., Consumption and portfolio choice over the life cycle, The review of financial studies, 18, 491-533, (2005)
[11] Davidoff, T.; Brown, J.; Diamond, P., Annuities and individual welfare, The American economic review, 95, 5, 1573-1590, (2005)
[12] Goldsticker, R, A mutual fund to yield annuity-like benefits, Financial analysts journal, 63, 1, 63-67, (2007)
[13] Gomes, F; Michaelides, A., Optimal life-cycle asset allocation: understanding the empirical evidence, Journal of finance, 60, 869-904, (2005)
[14] Ho, K.; Milevsky, M.; Robinson, C., Asset allocation, life expectancy and shortfall, Financial services review, 3, 2, 109-126, (1994)
[15] Horneff, W.; Maurer, R.; Mitchell, O.; Dus, I., Following the rules: integrating asset allocation and annuitization in retirement portfolios, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 42, 1, 396-408, (2008) · Zbl 1141.91448
[16] Horneff, W., Maurer, R., Mitchell, O., Stamos, M., 2007. Money in motion: Dynamic portfolio choice in retirement. Discussion paper, NBER No. 12942
[17] Horneff, W., Maurer, R., Stamos, M., 2006a. Life-cycle asset allocation with annuity markets: Is longevity insurance a good deal? Discussion paper, MRRC, 2006-126
[18] Horneff, W., Maurer, R., Stamos, M., 2006b. Optimal gradual annuitization: Quantifying the costs of switching to annuities. Discussion paper, Goethe University, Frankfurt
[19] Hughen, J; Laatsch, F.; Klein, D., Withdrawal patterns and rebalancing costs for taxable portfolios, Financial services review, 11, 4, 341-366, (2002)
[20] Hurd, M., Savings of the elderly and desired bequests, The American economic review, 77, 298-312, (1987)
[21] Hurd, M., Mortality risk and bequests, Econometrica, 57, 779-813, (1989)
[22] Koijen, R.S., Nijman, T., Werker, B.J.M., April, 2006. Dynamic asset allocation with annuity risk. Discussion paper, Tilburg University - Center for Economic Research · Zbl 1225.91061
[23] Kotlikoff, L.; Spivak, A., The family as an incomplete annuity market, Journal of political economy, 89, 2, 372-391, (1981)
[24] Kotlikoff, L.; Summers, L., The role of intergenerational transfers in aggregate capital accumulation, Journal of political economy, 89, 706-732, (1981)
[25] Merton, R, Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continous time case, Review of economics and statistics, 51, 3, 239-246, (1969)
[26] Merton, R., Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model, Journal of economic theory, 3, 4, 373-413, (1971) · Zbl 1011.91502
[27] Milevsky, M., Optimal asset allocation towards the end of the life cycle: to annuitize or not to annuitize?, Journal of risk and insurance, 65, 3, 401-426, (1998)
[28] Milevsky, M., Optimal annuitization policies: analysis of the options, North American actuarial journal, 5, 57-69, (2001) · Zbl 1083.91522
[29] Milevsky, M., The calculus of retirement income, financial models for pension annuities and life insurance, (2006), Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 1145.91036
[30] Milevsky, M.; Ho, K.; Robinson, C., Asset allocation via the conditional first exit time or how to avoid outliving your money, Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 9, 1, 53-70, (1997)
[31] Milevsky, M.; Moore, K.; Young, V., Asset allocation and annuity-purchase strategies to minimize the probability of financial ruin, Mathematical finance, 16, 647-671, (2006) · Zbl 1130.91031
[32] Milevsky, M.; Robinson, C., Self-annuitization and ruin in retirement, North American actuarial journal, 4, 112-129, (2000) · Zbl 1083.60515
[33] Milevsky, M.; Young, V., Annuitization and asset allocation, Journal of economic dynamics and control, (2006), forthcoming in 2007 · Zbl 1163.91440
[34] Mitchell, O.; Poterba, J.; Warshawsky, M.; Brown, J., New evidence on the moneys worth of individual annuities, The American economic review, 89, 1299-1318, (1999)
[35] Piggott, J; Valdez, E.; Detzel, B., The simple analytics of pooled annuity funds, The journal of risk and insurance, 72, 3, 497-520, (2005)
[36] Pye, G., Sustainable investment withdrawals, Journal of portfolio management, 26, 4, 73-83, (2000)
[37] Pye, G., Adjusting withdrawal rates for taxes and expenses, Journal of financial planning, 14, 4, 126-136, (2001)
[38] Richard, S., Optimal consumption, portfolio and life insurance rules for an uncertain lived individual in a continuous time model, Journal of financial economics, 2, 187-203, (1975)
[39] Schmeiser, H.; Post, T., Life annuity insurance versus self-annuitization: an analysis from the perspective of the family, Risk management & insurance review, 8, 2, 239-255, (2005)
[40] Siegel, J., Perspectives on the equity premium, Financial analysts journal, 61, 6, 61-73, (2005)
[41] Valdez, E.; Piggott, J.; Wang, L., Demand and adverse selection in a pooled annuity fund, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 39, 251-266, (2006) · Zbl 1098.91078
[42] Yaari, M., Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer, Review of economic studies, 32, 137-150, (1965)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.