##
**Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1140.91417

Summary: Let \(X\) denote the loss initially assumed by an insurer. In a reinsurance design, the insurer cedes part of its loss, say \(f(X)\), to a reinsurer, and thus the insurer retains a loss \(I_f(X)=X - f(X)\). In return, the insurer is obligated to compensate the reinsurer for undertaking the risk by paying the reinsurance premium. Hence, the sum of the retained loss and the reinsurance premium can be interpreted as the total cost of managing the risk in the presence of reinsurance. Based on a technique used by A. Müller and D. Stoyan [Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (2002; Zbl 0999.60002)] and motivated by J. Cai and K.S. Tan, Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measure. Astin Bull. 37 (1), 93–112 (2007)] on using the value-at-risk (VaR) and the conditional tail expectation (CTE) of an insurer’s total cost as the criteria for determining the optimal reinsurance, this paper derives the optimal ceded loss functions in a class of increasing convex ceded loss functions. The results indicate that depending on the risk measure’s level of confidence and the safety loading for the reinsurance premium, the optimal reinsurance can be in the forms of stop-loss, quota-share, or change-loss.

### MSC:

91B30 | Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010) |

### Keywords:

value-at-risk (VaR); conditional tail expectation (CTE); ceded loss; retained loss; increasing convex function; expectation premium principle; stop-loss reinsurance; quota-share reinsurance; change-loss reinsurance### Citations:

Zbl 0999.60002### Software:

QRM
PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{J. Cai} et al., Insur. Math. Econ. 43, No. 1, 185--196 (2008; Zbl 1140.91417)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Artzner, P.; Delbaen, F.; Eber, J.M.; Heath, D., Coherent measures of risks, Mathematical finance, 9, 203-228, (1999) · Zbl 0980.91042 |

[2] | Basak, S.; Shapiro, A., Value-at-risk-based risk management: optimal policies and asset prices, The review of financial studies, 14, 2, 371-405, (2001) |

[3] | Bowers, N.J.; Gerber, H.U.; Hickman, J.C.; Jones, D.A.; Nesbitt, C.J., Actuarial mathematics. second edition, (1997), The Society of Actuaries Schaumburg |

[4] | Cai, J.; Li, H., Conditional tail expectations for multivariate phase type distributions, Journal of applied probability, 42, 810-825, (2005) · Zbl 1079.62022 |

[5] | Cai, J.; Tan, K.S., Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the var and CTE risk measure, Astin bulletin, 37, 1, 93-112, (2007) · Zbl 1162.91402 |

[6] | Gajek, L.; Zagrodny, D., Optimal reinsurance under general risk measures, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 34, 227-240, (2004) · Zbl 1136.91478 |

[7] | Gerber, H.U., 1979, An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |

[8] | Inui, K.; Kijima, M., On the significance of expected shortfall as a coherent risk measure, Journal of banking and finance, 29, 853-864, (2005) |

[9] | Kaluszka, M., Optimal reinsurance under Mean-variance premium principles, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 28, 61-67, (2001) · Zbl 1009.62096 |

[10] | Kaluszka, M., An extension of arrow’s result on optimality of a stop loss contract, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 35, 527-536, (2004) · Zbl 1122.91343 |

[11] | Kaluszka, M., Mean-variance optimal reinsurance arrangements, Scandinavian actuarial journal, 1, 28-41, (2004) · Zbl 1117.62115 |

[12] | Kaluszka, M., Optimal reinsurance under convex principles of premium calculation, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 36, 375-398, (2005) · Zbl 1120.62092 |

[13] | Kaas, R.; Goovaerts, M.; Dhaene, J.; Denuit, M., Modern actuarial risk theory, (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston |

[14] | McNeil, A.J.; Frey, R.; Embrechts, P., Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools, (2005), Princeton University Press · Zbl 1089.91037 |

[15] | Müller, A., Stoyan, D., 2002. Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks. In: Willey Series in Probability and Statistics |

[16] | Yamai, Y.; Yoshiba, T., Value-at-risk versus expected shortfall: A practical perspective, Journal of banking and finance, 29, 997-1015, (2005) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.