zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows. (English) Zbl 1152.76025
Summary: Topology optimization of fluid dynamic systems is a comparatively young optimal design technique. Its central ingredient is the computation of topological sensitivity maps. Whereas, for finite element solvers, implementations of such sensitivity maps have been accomplished in the past, this study focuses on providing this functionality within a professional finite volume computational fluid dynamics solver. On the basis of a continuous adjoint formulation, we derive the adjoint equations and boundary conditions for typical cost functions of ducted flows and present first results for two- and three-dimensional geometries. Emphasis is placed on the versatility of our approach with respect to changes in the objective function. We further demonstrate that surface sensitivity maps can also be computed with the implemented functionality, and establish their connection with topological sensitivities.

76D55 Flow control and optimization for incompressible viscous fluids
76D05 Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids
76M12 Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
Full Text: DOI
[1] Jameson, Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method (2003)
[2] Giles, An introduction to the adjoint approach to design, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 65 pp 393– (2000)
[3] Mohammadi, Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids (2001) · Zbl 0970.76003
[4] Löhner R, Soto O, Yang C. An adjoint-based design methodology for CFD optimization problems. AIAA-03-0299, 2003.
[5] Soto O, Löhner R. On the computation of flow sensitivities from boundary integrals. AIAA-04-0112, 2004.
[6] Choi, Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization (2005)
[7] Borrvall, Topology optimization of fluids in Stokes flow, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 41 pp 77– (2003) · Zbl 1025.76007
[8] Sigmund, Proceedings of the Nordic MATLAB Conference 2003 pp 237– (2003)
[9] Olesen LH, Okkels F, Bruus H. Topology optimization of Navier-Stokes flow in microfluidics. ECCOMAS 2004, Jyväskylä, 2004.
[10] Gersborg-Hansen, Topology optimization of channel flow problems, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 30 (3) pp 181– (2005) · Zbl 1243.76034
[11] Guest, Topology optimization of creeping flows using a Darcy-Stokes finite element, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 66 (3) pp 461– (2006) · Zbl 1110.76310
[12] Olesen, A high-level programming-language implementation of topology optimization applied to steady-state Navier-Stokes flow, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 65 pp 975– (2006) · Zbl 1111.76017
[13] Srinath, A stabilized finite element method for shape optimization in low Reynolds number flows, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 54 (12) pp 1451– (2007) · Zbl 1205.76096
[14] Kaminski T, Giering R, Othmer C. Topological design based on highly efficient adjoints generated by automatic differentiation. ERCOFTAC Design Optimization Conference, Las Palmas, 2006.
[15] Othmer C, Kaminski T, Giering R. Computation of topological sensitivities in fluid dynamics: cost function versatility. ECCOMAS CFD 2006, Delft, 2006.
[16] Nadarajah S, Jameson A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. AIAA CP-00-0667, 2000.
[17] Cusdin, On the performance of discrete adjoint CFD codes using automatic differentiation, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 47 (6-7) pp 939– (2005) · Zbl 1134.76431
[18] Griewank, Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation (2000) · Zbl 0958.65028
[19] OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox. http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/index.html (2 August 2007).
[20] Othmer C, de Villiers E, Weller HG. Implementation of a continuous adjoint for topology optimization of ducted flows. AIAA-2007-3947, 2007.
[21] Dwight RP, Brezillon J. Effect of various approximations of the discrete adjoint on gradient-based optimization. AIAA-2006-0690, 2006.
[22] Svanberg, The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 24 pp 359– (1987) · Zbl 0602.73091
[23] Pironneau, Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems (1984) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-87722-3
[24] Mohammadi B, Bharadwaj R, Molho JI, Santiago JG. Incomplete sensitivities in design and control of fluidic channels. Annual Research Briefs 2001, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, 2001.
[25] Othmer C, Grahs T. Approaches to fluid dynamic optimization in the car development process. EUROGEN 2005, Munich, 2005.
[26] Samareh, A survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization, AIAA Journal 39 (5) pp 877– (2001)
[27] Soto, A stabilized pseudo-shell approach for surface parametrization in CFD design problems, Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 18 (4) pp 251– (2002) · Zbl 1063.76058
[28] Ronzheimer A. Shape parametrization in multidisciplinary design optimization based on freeform deformation. EUROGEN 2005, Munich, 2005. · Zbl 1273.76329
[29] Armstrong CG, Robinson TT, Ou H, Othmer C. Linking adjoint sensitivity maps with CAD parameters. EUROGEN 2007, Jyväskylä, 2007.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.