×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Mixed bundling auctions. (English) Zbl 1156.91353
Summary: We study multi-object auctions where agents have private and additive valuations for heterogeneous objects. We focus on the revenue properties of a class of dominant strategy mechanisms where a weight is assigned to each partition of objects. The weights influence the probability with which partitions are chosen in the mechanism. This class contains efficient auctions, pure bundling auctions, mixed bundling auctions, auctions with reserve prices and auctions with pre-packaged bundles. For any number of objects and bidders, both the pure bundling auction and separate, efficient auctions for the single objects are revenue-inferior to an auction that involves mixed bundling.

MSC:
91B26 Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Adams, W.; Yellen, J., Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly, Quart. J. econ., 90, 475-498, (1976)
[2] Armstrong, M., Multiproduct nonlinear pricing, Econometrica, 64, 51-75, (1996) · Zbl 0861.90015
[3] Armstrong, M., Optimal multi-object auctions, Rev. econ. stud., 67, 455-481, (2000) · Zbl 1055.91520
[4] L. Ausubel, P. Milgrom, Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding, Frontiers of Theoretical Economics, vol. 1 (1) (Article 1), 2002, http://www.bepress.com/bejte/frontiers/vol1/iss1/art1
[5] Avery, C.; Hendershott, T., Bundling and optimal auctions of multiple products, Rev. econ. stud., 67, 483-497, (2000) · Zbl 1055.91521
[6] S. Bikchchandani, S. Chatterji, A. Sen, Incentive compatibility in multi-unit auctions UCLA, Discussion Paper, 2004.
[7] Bulow, J.; Roberts, J., The simple economics of optimal auctions, J. polit. economy, 97, 5, 1060-1090, (1989)
[8] Chakraborty, I., Bundling decisions for selling multiple objects, Econ. theory, 13, 723-733, (1999) · Zbl 0941.91034
[9] Clarke, E., Multipart pricing of public goods, Public choice, 8, 19-33, (1971)
[10] Green, J.; Laffont, J.J., Incentives in public decision making, (1979), North-Holland Amsterdam · Zbl 0417.90001
[11] Groves, T., Incentives in teams, Econometrica, 41, 617-631, (1973) · Zbl 0311.90002
[12] H. Gui, R. Mueller, R. Vohra, Dominant strategy mechanisms with multidimensional types, Northwestern University, Discussion Paper, 2004.
[13] Holmstrom, B., Groves schemes on restricted domains, Econometrica, 47, 1137-1144, (1979) · Zbl 0411.90004
[14] Jehiel, P.; Moldovanu, B.; Stacchetti, E., Multidimensional mechanism design for auctions with externalities, J. econ. theory, 85, 2, 258-294, (1999) · Zbl 1028.91539
[15] Jehiel, P.; Moldovanu, B., A note on revenue-maximization and efficiency in multi-object auctions, Econ. bull., 3, 1-5, (2001)
[16] R. Lavi, A. Mualem, N. Nisan, Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Discussion Paper, 2004.
[17] A. Manelli, D. Vincent, Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist, Arizona State University, Discussion Paper, 2001. · Zbl 1122.91032
[18] McAfee, R.; McMillan, J.; Whinston, M., Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values, Quart. J. econ., 29, 371-388, (1989)
[19] Mookherjee, D.; Reichelstein, S., Dominant strategy implementation of Bayesian incentive compatible allocation rules, J. econ. theory, 56, 378-399, (1992) · Zbl 0761.90025
[20] Myerson, R., Optimal auction design, Math. oper. res., 6, 58-73, (1981) · Zbl 0496.90099
[21] Palfrey, T., Bundling decisions by a multiproduct monopolist with incomplete information, Econometrica, 51, 463-484, (1983) · Zbl 0495.90014
[22] Riley, J.; Samuelson, W., Optimal auctions, Amer. econ. rev., 71, 381-392, (1981)
[23] Roberts, K., The characterization of implementable choice rules, () · Zbl 0429.90009
[24] Rochet, J.C.; Chone, P., Ironing, sweeping, and multidimensional screening, Econometrica, 66, 783-826, (1998) · Zbl 1015.91515
[25] Vickrey, W., Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders, J. finance, 16, 8-37, (1961)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.