zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Opportunistic timing and manipulation in Australian federal elections. (English) Zbl 1157.91331
Summary: In many parliamentary systems, election timing is an important decision made by governments in order to maximize their expected remaining life in power. Governments can also introduce policy or economic actions to enhance their popular standing and thus their chance of being re-elected. On the other hand, an oppositions’ natural objective is to gain power, and they will also apply controls through their own policies to reduce the governments’ chance of being re-elected. In this paper we employ a dynamic programming approach to determine the optimal timing for governments and oppositions to best utilize their limited resources. At each decision branch, the optimal control is interpreted as a Nash-Cournot equilibrium of a zero-sum political game which, in certain states, admits mixed strategy solutions. We perform a case study on the Australian Federal Election for House of Representatives.

91B12 Voting theory
90C39 Dynamic programming
Full Text: DOI
[1] Achen, C.H., Mass political attitudes and the survey response, American political science review, 69, 1218-1231, (1975)
[2] Balke, N.S., The rational timing of parliamentary elections, Public choice, 65, 201-216, (1990)
[3] Bellman, R.E., Dynamic programming, (1957), Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
[4] Brown, L.B.; Chappell, H.W., Forecasting presidential elections using history and polls, International journal of forecasting, 15, 127-135, (1999)
[5] Chowdhury, A.R., Political surfing over economic waves: parliamentary election timing in India, American journal of political science, 37, 1100-1118, (1993)
[6] Eisinga, R.; Frances, P.H.; Ooms, M., Forecasting long memory left-right political orientations, International journal of forecasting, 15, 185-199, (1999)
[7] Enelow, J.M.; Melvin, J.H., The spatial theory of voting: an introduction, (1984), Cambridge University Press New York
[8] Holbrook, T.M.; DeSart, J.A., Using state polls to forecast presidential election outcomes in the American states, International journal of forecasting, 15, 137-142, (1999)
[9] Ito, T., The timing of elections and political business cycles in Japan, Journal of Asian economics, 1, 135-156, (1990)
[10] Jones, A.J., Game theory, (1980), Wiley New York · Zbl 0419.90086
[11] Karlin, S.; Taylor, H.M., A second course in stochastic processes, (1981), Academic Press New York · Zbl 0469.60001
[12] Kayser, M.A., Who surfs, who manipulates? the determinant of opportunistic election timing and electorally motivated economic intervention, American political science review, 99, 1-11, (2005)
[13] Kloeden, P.E.; Platen, E., Numerical solutions of stochastic differential equations, (1999), Springer-Verlag Berlin · Zbl 0701.60054
[14] Kmietowicz, Z.M., Sampling errors in political polls, Teaching statistics, 16, 70-74, (1994)
[15] Krosnick, J.A.; Berent, M.K., Comparison of party identification and policy preferences: the impact of survey question format, American journal of political science, 37, 941-964, (1993)
[16] Lesmono, D.; Tonkes, E.J.; Burrage, K., An early political election problem, ANZIAM journal, 45E, C16-C33, (2003) · Zbl 1097.91070
[17] Osborne, M.J., An introduction to game theory, (2004), Oxford University Press New York
[18] Palmer, H.D.; Whitten, G.D., Government competence, economic performance and endogenous election dates, Electoral studies, 19, 413-426, (2000)
[19] Smith, A., Endogenous election timing in Majoritarian parliamentary systems, Economics and politics, 8, 85-110, (1996)
[20] Smith, A., Election timing in Majoritarian parliaments, British journal of political science, 33, 397-418, (2003)
[21] Smith, A., Election timing, (2004), Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[22] The Department of the Parliamentary Library. Electoral System Research Paper No. 1989-1990. Canberra, 1999.
[23] Zaller, J.; Feldman, S., A simple theory of survey response: answering questions versus revealing preferences, American journal of political science, 26, 579-616, (1992)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.