×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Efficient and robust algorithms for solution of the adjoint compressible Navier-Stokes equations with applications. (English) Zbl 1161.76035
Summary: The complete discrete adjoint equations for an unstructured finite volume compressible Navier-Stokes solver are discussed with respect to the memory and time efficient evaluation of their residuals, and their solution. It is seen that application of existing iteration methods for the nonlinear equation – suitably adjointed – has a property of guaranteed convergence provided that the nonlinear iteration is well behaved. For situations where this is not the case, in particular for strongly separated flows, a stabilization technique based on the recursive projection method is developed. This method additionally provides the dominant eigenmodes of the problem, allowing identification of flow regions that are unstable under the basic iteration. These are found to be regions of separated flow. Finally, an adjoint-based optimization with 96 design variables is performed on a wing-body configuration. The initial flow has large regions of separation, which are significantly diminished in the optimized configuration.

MSC:
76M12 Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
76N15 Gas dynamics, general
76N25 Flow control and optimization for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
Software:
LAPACK
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Brezillon J, Brodersen O, Dwight R, Ronzheimer A, Wild J. Development and application of a flexible and efficient environment for aerodynamic shape optimisation. Proceedings of the ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium (ODAS), Toulouse, 2006.
[2] Griewank, Evaluating Derivatives, Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation (2000) · Zbl 0958.65028
[3] Pironneau, On optimum profiles in Stokes flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 59 (1) pp 117– (1973) · Zbl 0274.76022
[4] Pironneau, On optimum design in fluid mechanics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 64 (2) pp 97– (1974) · Zbl 0281.76020
[5] Jameson, Aerodynamic design via control theory, Journal of Scientific Computing 3 (3) pp 233– (1988) · Zbl 0676.76055
[6] Elbanna H, Carlson L. Determination of aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in the transonic and supersonic regimes. AIAA Paper Series, Paper 89-0532, 1989.
[7] Taylor III A, Korivi V, Hou G. Sensitivity analysis applied to the Euler equations: a feasibility study with emphasis on variation of geometric shape. AIAA Paper Series, Paper 91-0173, 1991.
[8] Baysal, Aerodynamic design sensitivity analysis methods for the compressible Euler equations, Journal of Fluids Engineering 113 (4) pp 681– (1991)
[9] Dulikravitch, Aerodynamic shape design optimization: status and trends, Journal of Aircraft 29 (6) pp 1020– (1992)
[10] Newman III, Overview of sensitivity analysis and shape optimization for complex aerodynamic configurations, Journal of Aircraft 36 (1) pp 97– (1999)
[11] UthupB, KoruthuS-P, SharmaR-K, PriyadarshiP (eds). Recent Trends in Aerospace Design and Optimization. Tata-McGraw Hill: New Delhi, 2005.
[12] Gerhold T, Galle M, Friedrich O, Evans J. Calculation of complex 3D configurations employing the DLR TAU-Code. AIAA Paper Series, AIAA-1997-0167, 1997.
[13] Dwight R. Efficiency improvements of RANS-based analysis and optimization using implicit and adjoint methods on unstructured grids. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, 2006.
[14] Kroll, The MEGAFLOW-Project-Numerical Flow Simulation for Aircraft (2006) · Zbl 1083.00007 · doi:10.1007/3-540-28073-1
[15] Gerhold, New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics pp 426– (1999)
[16] Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. AIAA Paper Series, AIAA-1981-1259, 1981.
[17] Edwards, Comparison of eddy-viscosity transport turbulence models for three-dimensional shock-separated flowfields, AIAA Journal 34 (4) pp 1– (1996)
[18] Dwight R, Brezillon J. Effect of various approximations of the discrete adjoint on gradient-based optimization. Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA-2006-0690, 2006.
[19] Mavriplis D. Personal Communication, 2004.
[20] Yoon, An LU-SSOR scheme for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA Journal 26 pp 1025– (1988)
[21] Giles, Automatic Differentiation: From Simulation to Optimization pp 145– (2001)
[22] Schroff, Stabilization of unstable procedures: the recursive projection method, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 30 (4) pp 1099– (1993)
[23] Keller H. RPM: a remedy for instability. In Collected Lectures on the Preservation of Stability under Discretization, SIAM Proceedings in Applied Mathematics, vol. 109, Estep D, Tavener S (eds), 2002; 185-196.
[24] Möller J. Aspects of the recursive projection method applied to flow calculations. Ph.D. Thesis, NADA, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005. ISBN 91-7283-940-6, TRITA-NA-0444.
[25] Görtz S, Möller J. Evaluation of the recursive projection method for efficient unsteady turbulent CFD simulation. ICAS, Yokohama, Japan, 2004.
[26] Campobasso, Stabilization of a linear flow solver for turbomachinery aeroelasticity by means of the recursive projection method, AIAA Journal 42 (9) pp 1765– (2004)
[27] Anderson, LAPACK Users’ Guide (1999) · Zbl 0934.65030 · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719604
[28] Cook, Aerofoil RAE 2822-Pressure Distributions and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements 138 (1979)
[29] Pironneau, On optimum design in fluid mechanics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 64 pp 97– (1974) · Zbl 0281.76020
[30] Jameson, Aerodynamic design via control theory, Journal of Scientific Computing 3 pp 233– (1988) · Zbl 0676.76055
[31] Hicks, Wing design by numerical optimization, Journal of Aircraft 15 pp 407– (1978)
[32] Reuther, Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers, Journal of Aircraft 36 pp 51– (1999)
[33] Brezillon J, Dwight R. Discrete adjoint of the Navier-Stokes equations for aerodynamic shape optimization. Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, EUROGEN, Munich, Germany, 2005.
[34] Wild J. Acceleration of aerodynamic optimization based on RANS-equations by using semi-structured grids. Design Optimization International Conference, Athens, 2004.
[35] Ronzheimer A. Shape based on freeform deformation in aerodynamic design optimization. ERCOFTAC Design Optimization International Conference, Athens, 2004.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.