# zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Dynamic economic analysis on invasive species management: some policy implications of catchability. (English) Zbl 1169.92046
Summary: The problem of controlling invasive species has emerged as a global issue. In response to invasive species threats, governments often propose eradication. This article challenges the eradication view by studying optimal strategies for controlling invasive species in a simple dynamic model. The analysis mainly focuses on deriving policy implications of catchability in a situation where a series of controlling actions incurs operational costs that derive from the fact that catchability depends on the current stock size of invasive species.
We analytically demonstrate that the optimal policy changes drastically, depending on the sensitivity of catchability in response to a change in the stock size, as well as on the initial stock. If the sensitivity of catchability is sufficiently high, the constant escapement policy with some interior target level is optimal. In contrast, if the sensitivity of catchability is sufficiently low, there could exist a threshold of the initial stock which differentiates the optimal action between immediate eradication and giving-up without any control. In the intermediate range, immediate eradication, giving-up without any control, or more complex policies may be optimal. Numerical analysis is employed to present economic intuitions and insights in both analytically tractable and intractable cases.

##### MSC:
 92D40 Ecology 49N90 Applications of optimal control and differential games 91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) 65C20 Probabilistic models, generic numerical methods in probability and statistics 93C95 Application models in control theory
Full Text:
##### References:
 [1] Bomford, M.; O’Brien, P., Eradication or control for vertebrate pests, Wildl. soc. bull., 23, 249, (1995) [2] Caputo, M.R.; Wilen, J.E., Optimal cleanup of hazardous wastes, Int. econ. rev., 36, 1, 217, (1995) · Zbl 0827.90038 [3] Clark, C.W., Profit maximization and the extinctions of animal species, J. political econ., 81, 4, 950, (1973) [4] Clark, C.W., Mathematical bioeconomics, (1990), John Wiley and Sons, Inc. · Zbl 0712.90018 [5] Clark, C.W.; Kirkwood, G.P., On uncertain renewable resource stocks: optimal harvest policies and the value of stock surveys, J. environ. econ. manag., 13, 235, (1986) · Zbl 0601.90030 [6] M.N. Clout, C.R. Veitch, Turning the tilde of biological invasion: the potential for eradicating invasive species, in: M.N. Clout, C.R., Veitch (Eds.), Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species, 2002, pp. 1-3. [7] Conrad, J.M., Resource economics, (1999), Cambridge University [8] Dasgupta, P.; Maler, K., The economics of non-convex ecosystems: introduction, Environ. resource econ., 26, 499, (2003) [9] () [10] Eisewerth, M.E.; Johnson, W.S., Managing nonindigenous invasive species: insights from dynamic analysis, Environ. resource econ., 23, 3, 319, (2002) [11] Elaydi, S., An introduction to difference equations, (2005), Springer · Zbl 1071.39001 [12] Fresard, M.; Boncoeur, J., Controlling the biological invasion of a commercial fishery by a space competitor: a bioeconomic model with reference the bay of st-breuc scallop fishery, Agric. resource econ. rev., 35, 1, 78, (2006) [13] Hokkaido-Government, A Report on Plan: Racoon Controls in Hokkaido, Hokkaido Government, Japan, 2006. [14] Ito, Y.; Kakihana, H., Noyaku-nashi de gaityuu-to-tatakau, (1999), Iwanami-shoten Berlin, (in Japanese) [15] Judd, K.L., Numerical methods in economics, (1998), MIT · Zbl 0941.00048 [16] B. Kaiser, J. Roumasset, Optimal public control of exotic species: preventing the brown tree snake from invading Hawaii, Working paper, 2002. [17] Kim, C.S.; Lubowski, R.N.; Lewandrowski, J.; Eisewerth, M.E., Prevention or control: optimal government policies for invasive species management, Agric. resource econ. rev., 35, 1, 29, (2006) [18] Majumdar, M.; Mitra, T., Dynamic optimization with non-convex technology: the case of a linear objective function, Rev. econ. studies, 50, 143, (1983) · Zbl 0501.90016 [19] Maler, K.; Xepapadeas, A.; de Zeeuw, A., The economics of shallow lakes, Environ. resource econ., 26, 603, (2003) [20] May, R.M., Biological populations with non-overlapping generations: stable points, stable cycles, and chaos, Science, 186, 645, (1974) [21] Moxnes, E., Uncertain measurements of renewable resources: approximations, harvesting policies and value of accuracy, J. environ. econ. manag., 45, 85, (2003) · Zbl 1026.90064 [22] Myers, J.H.; Savoie, A.; van Randen, E., Eradication and pest management, Ann. rev. entomol., 43, 471, (1998) [23] Nyarko, Y.; Olson, L.J., Stochastic dynamic models with stock-dependent rewards, J. econ. theory, 55, 161, (1991) · Zbl 0743.90032 [24] Olson, L.J.; Roy, S., The economics of controlling a stochastic biological invasion, Am. J. agric. econ., 84, 5, 1311, (2002) [25] Olson, L.J.; Roy, S., On prevention and control of an uncertain biological invasion, Rev. agric. econ., 27, 3, 491, (2005) [26] Olson, L.J.; Roy, S., Controlling a biological invasion: a non-classical dynamic economic model, Econ. theory, 36, 453, (2008) · Zbl 1148.91032 [27] Potapov, A.B.; Lewis, M.A., Allee effect and control of lake system invasion, Bull. math. biol., 70, 5, 1371, (2008) · Zbl 1142.92046 [28] Potapov, A.B.; Lewis, M.A.; Finnoff, D.C., Optimal control of biological invasions in lake networks, Nat. resource model., 20, 3, 351, (2007) · Zbl 1157.92334 [29] Quinn, T.J.; Deriso, R.B., Quantitative fish dynamics, (1999), Oxford University [30] Reed, W.J., Optimal escapement levels in stochastic and deterministic harvesting models, J. environ. econ. manag., 6, 350, (1979) · Zbl 0439.90020 [31] Rondeau, D., Along the way back from the brink, J. environ. econ. manag., 42, 156, (2001) · Zbl 0999.91069 [32] Rondeau, D.; Conrad, J.M., Managing urban deer, Am. J. agric. econ., 85, 1, 266, (2003) [33] Roughgarden, J.; Smith, F., Why fisheries collapse and what to do about it?, Proc. natl. acad. sci. USA, 93, 10, 5078, (1996) [34] Saphores, J.M.; Shogren, J.F., Managing exotic pests under uncertainty: optimal control actions and bioeconomic investigations, Ecol. econ., 52, 327, (2005) [35] Sethi, G.; Costello, C.; Fisher, A.; Hanemann, M.; Karp, L., Fishery management under multiple uncertainty, J. environ. econ. manag., 50, 300, (2005) · Zbl 1090.91072 [36] Settle, C.; Crocker, T.D.; Shogren, J.F., On the joint determination of biological and economic systems, Ecol. econ., 42, 301, (2002) [37] D. Simberloff, Today tiritiri matangi, tomorrow the world! Are we aiming too low in invasion control?, in: M.N. Clout, C.R. Veitch (Eds.), Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species, 2002, pp. 4-12. [38] Skiba, A.K., Optimal growth with a convex – concave production function, Econometrica, 46, 527, (1978) · Zbl 0383.90020 [39] Spence, M.; Starrett, D., Most rapid approach paths in accumulation problems, Int. econ. rev., 16, 2, 388, (1975) · Zbl 0316.90009 [40] Tahvonen, O.; Salo, S., Nonconvexities in optimal pollution accumulation, J. environ. econ. manag., 31, 2, 160, (1996) · Zbl 0908.90078
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.