zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

The optimal transit fare structure under different market regimes with uncertainty in the network. (English) Zbl 1170.90336
Summary: This paper proposes a network-based model for investigating the optimal transit fare structure under monopoly and oligopoly market regimes with uncertainty in the network. The proposed model treats the interaction between transit operators and transit passengers in the market as a two-level hierarchical problem with the transit operator sub-model at the upper-level and the transit passenger sub-model at the lower-level. The upper-level problem is to determine the fare structure so as to optimize the objective function of the transit operators, whereas the lower-level problem represents the path choice equilibrium of the transit passengers. In order to consider the uncertainty effects on transit network, the proposed model incorporates the unreliability component of transit services into the passenger disutility function, which is mainly due to variations of the in-vehicle travel time and the dwelling time of transit vehicles at stops. With the use of the proposed model, a numerical example is given to assess the impacts of the market regimes and the unreliability of the transit services on the optimal transit fare structure.

90B15 Stochastic network models in operations research
Full Text: DOI
[1] Allen WB, Mahmoud MM, McNeil D (1985) The importance of time in transit and reliability of transit time for shippers, receivers, and carriers. Transp Res 19B:447–456 · doi:10.1016/0191-2615(85)90057-8
[2] Bell MGH (2007) Mixed routing strategies for hazardous materials: decision-making under complete uncertainty. Int J Sustain Transp 1:133–142 · doi:10.1080/15568310601092013
[3] Bell MGH, Cassir C (2002) Risk-averse user equilibrium traffic assignment: an application of game theory. Transp Res 36B:671–681 · doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00022-4
[4] Bell MGH, Schmoecker JD, Iida Y, Lam WHK (2002) Transit network reliability: an application of absorbing Markov chains. In: Taylor MAP (ed) Transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 43–62
[5] Boyce DE (2007) Forecasting travel on congested urban transportation networks: review and prospects for network equilibrium models. Netw Spat Econ 7:99–128 · Zbl 1144.90320 · doi:10.1007/s11067-006-9009-0
[6] Carey M (1999) Ex ante heuristic measures of schedule reliability. Transp Res 33B:473–494 · doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00002-8
[7] Chien S, Schonfeld P (1998) Joint optimization of a rail transit line and its feeder bus system. J Adv Transp 32:253–284 · doi:10.1002/atr.5670320302
[8] Chien S, Daripally SK, Kim K (2007) Development of a probabilistic model to optimize disseminated real-time bus arrival information for pre-trip passengers. J Adv Transp 41:195–215 · doi:10.1002/atr.5670410205
[9] De Cea J, Fernandez E (1993) Transit assignment for congested public transport systems: an equilibrium model. Transp Sci 27:133–147 · Zbl 0788.90030 · doi:10.1287/trsc.27.2.133
[10] Fernandez E, Marcotte P (1992) Operators-users equilibrium model in a partially regulated transit system. Transp Sci 26:93–105 · Zbl 0825.90369 · doi:10.1287/trsc.26.2.93
[11] Frima M, Edvardsson B, Gaerling T (1998) Perceived service quality attributes in public transport: inference from complaints and negative critical incidents. J Public Transp 2:67–89
[12] Hall RW (1983) Travel outcome and performance: the effect of uncertainty on accessibility. Transp Res 17B:275–290 · doi:10.1016/0191-2615(83)90046-2
[13] Heydecker BG, Lam WHK, Zhang N (2007) Use of travel demand satisfaction to assess road network reliability. Transportmetrica 3:139–171 · doi:10.1080/18128600708685670
[14] Huang HJ, Li ZC (2007) A multiclass multicriteria logit-based traffic equilibrium assignment model under ATIS. Eur J Oper Res 176:1464–1477 · Zbl 1113.90020 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.035
[15] Jackson W, Jucker J (1981) An empirical study of travel time variability and travel choice behavior. Transp Sci 16:460–475 · doi:10.1287/trsc.16.4.460
[16] Kocur G, Hendrickson C (1982) Design of local bus service with demand equilibration. Transp Sci 16:149–170 · doi:10.1287/trsc.16.2.149
[17] Lam WHK, Morrall J (1982) Bus passenger walking distances and waiting times: a summer–winter comparison. Transp Quart 36:407–421
[18] Lam WHK, Zhou J (2000) Optimal fare structure for transit networks with elastic demand. Transp Res Rec 1733:8–14 · doi:10.3141/1733-02
[19] Lam WHK, Cheung CY, Poon YF (1998) A study of train dwelling time at the Hong Kong mass transit railway system. J Adv Transp 32:285–296 · doi:10.1002/atr.5670320303
[20] Lam WHK, Zhou J, Sheng Z (2002) A capacity restraint transit assignment with elastic line frequency. Transp Res 36B:919–938 · doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00042-X
[21] Lam WHK, Lee YS, Chan KS, Goh PK (2003) A generalized function for modeling bi-directional flow effects on indoor walkways in Hong Kong. Transp Res 37A:789–810
[22] Li ZC, Huang HJ, Lam WHK, Wong SC (2007) Time-differential pricing of road tolls and parking charges in a transport network with elastic demand. In: Allsop RE, Bell MGH, Heydecker BG (eds) Transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 55–85
[23] Lo HK, Yip CW, Wan KH (2003) Modeling transfer and non-linear fare structure in multi-modal network. Transp Res 37B:149–170 · doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00005-X
[24] Lo HK, Yip CW, Wan KH (2004) Modeling competitive multi-modal transit services: a nested logit approach. Transp Res 12C:251–272
[25] Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
[26] Nguyen S, Pallottino S (1988) Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. Eur J Oper Res 37:176–186 · Zbl 0649.90049 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(88)90327-X
[27] Noland RB, Small KA, Koskenoja PM, Chu X (1998) Simulating travel reliability. Reg Sci Urban Econ 28:535–564 · doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00009-X
[28] Oppenheim N (1995) Urban travel demand modeling: from individual choices to general equilibrium. Wiley, New York
[29] Patriksson M (1994) The traffic assignment problem–models and methods. VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands
[30] Richardson AJ, Taylor MAP (1978) Travel time variability on commuter journeys. High Speed Ground Transp J 12:77–99
[31] Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
[32] Spiess H, Florian M (1989) Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transp Res 23B:83–102 · doi:10.1016/0191-2615(89)90034-9
[33] Szeto WY, O’Brien L, O’Mahony M (2006) Risk-averse traffic assignment with elastic demands: NCP formulation and solution method for assessing performance reliability. Netw Spat Econ 6:313–332 · Zbl 1128.90016 · doi:10.1007/s11067-006-9286-7
[34] Taylor MAP (1982) Travel time variability-the case of two public modes. Transp Sci 16:517–521 · doi:10.1287/trsc.16.4.507
[35] Tisato P (1998) Service unreliability and bus subsidy. Transp Res 32B:423–436
[36] Transport Department (2003) Travel characteristics survey 2002–final report, Hong Kong. Transport Department of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
[37] Uchida K, Sumalee A, Watling D, Connors R (2005) Study on optimal frequency design problem for multimodal network using probit-based user equilibrium assignment. Transpn Res Rec 1923:236–245 · doi:10.3141/1923-25
[38] Wu JH, Florian M, Marcotte P (1994) Transit equilibrium assignment: a model and solution algorithms. Transp Sci 28:193–203 · Zbl 0814.90025 · doi:10.1287/trsc.28.3.193
[39] Yang H (1997) Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications. Transp Res 31B:55–70 · doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00015-X
[40] Yang H, Woo KK (2000) Modeling bus service under competition and regulation. ASCE J Transp Eng 126:419–425 · doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:5(419)
[41] Yang H, Kong HY, Meng Q (2001) Value-of-time distributions and competitive bus services. Transp Res 37E:411–424
[42] Yin Y, Lam WHK, Miller MA (2004) A simulation-based reliability assessment approach for congested transit network. J Adv Transp 38:27–44 · doi:10.1002/atr.5670380104
[43] Zhou J, Lam WHK, Heydecker BG (2005) The generalized Nash equilibrium model for oligopolistic transit market with elastic demand. Transp Res 39B:519–544 · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.003
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.