×

The dynamics of issue introduction: A model based on the politics of ideology. (English) Zbl 1187.91178

Summary: Many topics might be discussed in the course of any election, but problems that are in fact discussed, and which affect the electorate’s choice, are located in the issue space of a relatively small dimension. Two factors contribute to this phenomenon: (a) party platforms are usually presented to the electorate as packages of issues, and (b) candidates tend to emphasize only a few particular issues in the campaign. We model a dynamic process of changing the issue space by candidates as a matter of their campaign strategy and study factors causing changes in the dimensionality or/and in the structure of the set of issues shaping the political conflict in the election. We show how particular features of an added new issue can change voter perceptions of the candidates or the structure of the political conflict in the election when the new issue is such that (1) voters care about it, (2) a majority of voters are interested changing the status quo of anything associated with this issue, and (3) the existing ideological differences among the candidates have clear reflections in voters’ minds.

MSC:

91F10 History, political science
91B12 Voting theory
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Schofield, N., Instability of simple dynamic games, Review of Economic Studies, 45, 3, 575-594 (1978) · Zbl 0401.90005
[2] Enelow, J.; Hinich, Melvin, The Spatial Theory of Voting (1984), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York · Zbl 1156.91303
[3] McKelvey, R., Covering dominance, and institution-free properties of social choice, American Journal of Political Science, 30, 283-314 (1986)
[4] Hinich, M.; Munger, M., Analytical Politics (1997), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York
[5] Riker, W., Political science and rational choice, (Alt, J. E.; Shepsle, K., Perspectives on Positive Political Theory (1990), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York)
[6] Aldrich, J., A spatial model with party activists: Implications for electoral dynamics, Public Choice, 41, 63-100 (1983)
[7] Aldrich, J., A downsian spatial model with party activism, American Political Science Review, 77, 974-990 (1983)
[8] Burnham, W., Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics (1970), Norton: Norton New York
[9] Key, V. O., A theory of critical elections, Journal of Politics, 17, 3-18 (1955)
[10] Riker, W., The Art of Political Manipulation (1986), Yale UP: Yale UP New Haven
[11] Sundquist, W., Dynamics of the Party System (1973), Brookings: Brookings Washington, DC
[12] Riker, W., The Theory of Political Coalitions (1962), Yale UP: Yale UP New Haven
[13] MacRae, D., Issues and Parties in Legislative Voting; Methods of Statistical Analysis (1970), Harper and Row: Harper and Row New York
[14] Weisberg, H. F.; Rusk, J., Dimensions of candidate evaluation, American Political Science Review, 64, 1167-1185 (1970)
[15] Miller, G.; Schofield, N., Activists and partisan realignment in the United States, American Political Science Review, 97, 2, 245-260 (2003)
[16] Feld, S.; Grofman, B., A theorem connecting shapley-owen power scores and the radius of the yolk in two dimensions, Social Choice and Welfare, 7, 71-74 (1990) · Zbl 0712.90017
[17] Baumgartner, F. R.; Jones, B. D., Agendas and Instability in American Politics (1993), University of Chicago Press: University of Chicago Press Chicago
[18] Hinich, M.; Pollard, W., A new approach to the spatial theory of electoral competition, American Journal of Political Science, 25, 323-341 (1981)
[19] Enelow, J.; Hinich, M., The theory of predictive mappings, (Enelow; Hinich, Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting (1990), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York) · Zbl 1156.91303
[20] Poole, K.; Rosenthal, H., Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (1997), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York
[21] Hinich, M.; Munger, M., Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice (1994), University of Michigan Press: University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
[22] Dougan, William; Munger, Michael, The rationality of ideology, Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 119-142 (1989)
[23] Enelow, J.; Hinich, M., The location of American presidential candidates: An empirical test of a new spatial model of elections, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 12, 461-470 (1989) · Zbl 0709.90630
[24] Laver, Michael; Schofield, Norman, Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe (1990), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press Oxford
[25] Conover, Pamela; Stanley, Feldman, How people organized the political world: A schematic model, American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95-126 (1984)
[26] Converse, Phillip, The nature of belief systems in mass publics, (Apter, David, Ideology and Discontent (1964), Free Press: Free Press New York), 219-241
[27] Denzau, Arthur; North, Douglass, Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions, Kyklos, 47, 1, 3-31 (1994)
[28] Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957), Addison Wesley Publishing: Addison Wesley Publishing Chicago
[29] Macdonald, Stuart Elaine; Rabinowitz, George, The dynamics of structural realignment, American Political Science Review, 81, 779-796 (1987)
[30] Rabinowitz, George; Macdonald, Stuart E., A directional theory of issue voting, American Journal of Political Science Review, 83, 93-121 (1989)
[31] McKelvey, R., Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control, Journal of Economic Theory, 12, 472-482 (1976) · Zbl 0373.90003
[32] McKelvey, D. Richard; Schofield, Norman, Structural instability of the core, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 15, 179-198 (1986) · Zbl 0617.90099
[33] Schattschneider, E. E., Party Government (1942), Farrar and Rinehart: Farrar and Rinehart New York
[34] Patty, J., Incommensurability and Issue Voting, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19, 115-131 (2007)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.