×

The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks. (English) Zbl 1203.91242

Summary: When a disease breaks out in a human population, changes in behavior in response to the outbreak can alter the progression of the infectious agent. In particular, people aware of a disease in their proximity can take measures to reduce their susceptibility. Even if no centralized information is provided about the presence of a disease, such awareness can arise through first-hand observation and word of mouth. To understand the effects this can have on the spread of a disease, we formulate and analyze a mathematical model for the spread of awareness in a host population, and then link this to an epidemiological model by having more informed hosts reduce their susceptibility. We find that, in a well-mixed population, this can result in a lower size of the outbreak, but does not affect the epidemic threshold. If, however, the behavioral response is treated as a local effect arising in the proximity of an outbreak, it can completely stop a disease from spreading, although only if the infection rate is below a threshold. We show that the impact of locally spreading awareness is amplified if the social network of potential infection events and the network over which individuals communicate overlap, especially so if the networks have a high level of clustering. These findings suggest that care needs to be taken both in the interpretation of disease parameters, as well as in the prediction of the fate of future outbreaks.

MSC:

91D30 Social networks; opinion dynamics
92D30 Epidemiology
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI Link

References:

[1] Ferguson, Nature; Physical Science (London) 446 (7137) pp 733– (2007)
[2] J HUM RESOUR 31 pp 611– (1996)
[3] J HUM RESOUR 31 pp 896– (1996)
[4] Macintyre, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education 13 (2) pp 160– (2001)
[5] NEW MEDIA SOC 9 pp 987– (2007)
[6] 374 pp 457– (2007)
[7] J IDEAS 2 pp 3– (1991)
[8] Goffman, Nature; Physical Science (London) 204 pp 225– (1964)
[9] PHYS REV E 73 pp 046138– (2006)
[10] PNAS 104 (18) pp 7582– (2007)
[11] PNAS 104 (18) pp 7588– (2007)
[12] PNAS 100 (18) pp 10564– (2003) · Zbl 1065.92038
[13] Perisic 5 (2) pp e1000280– (2009)
[14] PNAS 104 (13) pp 5692– (2007)
[15] Salathe, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 5 (29) pp 1505– (2008)
[16] Gross, Physical Review Letters 96 (20) pp 208701– (2006)
[17] Del Valle, Mathematical biosciences 195 (2) pp 228– (2005) · Zbl 1065.92039
[18] Eubank, Nature; Physical Science (London) 429 (6988) pp 180– (2004)
[19] ANDERSON, Mathematical Medicine and Biology 3 (4) pp 229– (1986)
[20] Andersson, Mathematical biosciences 140 (2) pp 79– (1997) · Zbl 0881.92027
[21] BULL AM MATH SOC 44 pp 63– (2007)
[22] Keeling, Journal of Theoretical Biology 203 (1) pp 51– (2000)
[23] Barabasi, Science 286 (5439) pp 509– (1999) · Zbl 1226.05223
[24] Keeling, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266 (1421) pp 859– (1999)
[25] Science 300 (5627) pp 1961– (2003)
[26] Liljeros, Nature; Physical Science (London) 411 (6840) pp 907– (2001)
[27] 5 pp 381– (2008)
[28] Edmunds, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 264 (1384) pp 949– (1997)
[29] Canada communicable disease report = Relev   des maladies transmissibles au Canada 34 (11) pp 1– (2008)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.