Facies modeling using a Markov mesh model specification.

*(English)*Zbl 1219.86018Summary: The spatial continuity of facies is one of the key factors controlling flow in reservoir models. Traditional pixel-based methods such as truncated Gaussian random fields and indicator simulation are based on only two-point statistics, which is insufficient to capture complex facies structures. Current methods for multi-point statistics either lack a consistent statistical model specification or are too computer intensive to be applicable. We propose a Markov mesh model based on generalized linear models for geological facies modeling. The approach defines a consistent statistical model that is facilitated by efficient estimation of model parameters and generation of realizations. Our presentation includes a formulation of the general framework, model specifications in two and three dimensions, and details on how the parameters can be estimated from a training image. We illustrate the method using multiple training images, including binary and trinary images and simulations in two and three dimensions. We also do a thorough comparison to the snesim approach. We find that the current model formulation is applicable for multiple training images and compares favorably to the snesim approach in our test examples. The method is highly memory efficient.

##### Software:

SGeMS
PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{M. Stien} and \textit{O. Kolbjørnsen}, Math. Geosci. 43, No. 6, 611--624 (2011; Zbl 1219.86018)

Full Text:
DOI

##### References:

[1] | Abend K, Harley T, Kanal L (1965) Classification of binary random patterns. IEEE Trans Inf Theory IT-11:538–544 · Zbl 0129.11801 |

[2] | Cressie N, Davidson J (1998) Image analysis with partially ordered Markov models. Comput Stat Data Anal 29(1):1–26 · Zbl 1042.62611 |

[3] | Daly C (2005) Higher order models using entropy, Markov random fields and sequential simulation, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–224 · Zbl 1366.62159 |

[4] | Damsleth E, Tjølsen C, Omre H, Haldorsen H (1992) A two-stage stochastic model applied to a north sea reservoir. SPE JPT 44(4):402–408 |

[5] | Guardiano, Srivastava (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–144 |

[6] | Kjønsberg H, Kolbjørnsen O (2008) Markov mesh simulations with data conditioning through indicator kriging, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 257–266 |

[7] | Liu Y (2006) Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Comput Geosci 32:1544–1563 |

[8] | McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2 edn. Chapman and Hall, London · Zbl 0744.62098 |

[9] | Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |

[10] | Skorstad A, Kolbjørnsen O, Fjellvoll B, Howell J (2005) Sensitivity of oil production to petrophysical heterogeneities. Springer, Dordrecht |

[11] | Soleng H, Syversveen A, Kolbjørnsen O (2006) Comparing facies realizations: Defining metrices on realization space. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference in Mathematics of Oil Recovery, p A014 |

[12] | Strebelle S (2000) In: Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments, vol 1 |

[13] | Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34 · Zbl 1036.86013 |

[14] | Tjelmeland H, Besag J (1998) Markov random fields with higher-order interactions. Scand J Stat 25:415–433 · Zbl 0928.60049 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.